Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: General Overview
- Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ 1999 to 2004 Crash Test and Safety Ratings
Important Information to help you understand your Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Browse all: General Overview
XJ Ask the Question Thread
RE: Heater problem. I went to home depot and bought a 3/4" brass coupling http://www.homedepot.com/p/SharkBite...FA5/202270595# and a ball valve http://www.homedepot.com/p/SharkBite...2LF/202270560# to replace the stock diverter as a temporary fix. Took 10 minutes to install and works great. I don't do any troubleshooting that I don't have to in zero degree weather!
ha ha, Nah I avoid all that E10 stuff like the plague as it is. I was driving through Nebraska and they actually offer 87 in 10%E and no E which is pretty cool. Got way better mileage with the pure gas.
No, I don't lick fish.



Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 11,169
Likes: 26
From: Northern Kentucky
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
YUP!!! They know you do too. Go on www.fueleconomy.gov - when you compare gas mileage, look below the mileage and you'll see something about "original EPA estimate"... when you look up the info on why it changed - one of the reasons is the ethanol in the fuel.
It's hilarious that there's this big push for more fuel-efficient vehicles, but they're putting additives into the fuel that take AWAY fuel efficiency... STUPID!
It's hilarious that there's this big push for more fuel-efficient vehicles, but they're putting additives into the fuel that take AWAY fuel efficiency... STUPID!
YUP!!! They know you do too. Go on www.fueleconomy.gov - when you compare gas mileage, look below the mileage and you'll see something about "original EPA estimate"... when you look up the info on why it changed - one of the reasons is the ethanol in the fuel.
It's hilarious that there's this big push for more fuel-efficient vehicles, but they're putting additives into the fuel that take AWAY fuel efficiency... STUPID!
It's hilarious that there's this big push for more fuel-efficient vehicles, but they're putting additives into the fuel that take AWAY fuel efficiency... STUPID!

Last edited by kgm; Jan 5, 2014 at 03:13 PM.
No, I don't lick fish.



Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 11,169
Likes: 26
From: Northern Kentucky
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Before they started adding ethanol to fuel, lawn guys could run their 2 cycle motors for a year without needing to rebuild the carb - now, it's every few months. The fuel is HORRIBLE!
Herp Derp Jerp

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Ethanol in the US is a joke for a couple of reasons. Actually it's nearly criminal. Ethanol has a lower energy density than gasoline, so it's no surprise that most vehicles have worse fuel economy running on E10 blends. Certain engines, have actually been known to have economy worsened to the point that the overall rate that gasoline is burnt has actually increased! Go figure huh. The great "environmental" irony is that ethanol burns cleaner than gasoline - this is true - however in the US (and Canada, by extension) ethanol is derived from corn. As you've probably noticed after eating corn on the cob, corn is incredibly tough. To process the sugars into ethanol and break down the fibrous matter, the corn is made into a slurry and cooked in coal-fueled furnaces. So not only are engines using more gasoline, but we're also firing massive coal plants! Yeah that sounds green to me! In addition to this, the whole nightmare is actually driving up world food prices because we're using food for fuel... and world fuel prices because we're using more fuel because the food doesn't burn well enough! (Technically the corn used in ethanol isn't "food grade", but tell that to cows. As well the amount of arable land is very limited and this is a colossal waste of natural resources, and stuff like fertilizer) Literally the only parties that benefits from ethanol are corn farmers, who receive a nice government subsidy to waste gas instead of feeding people.
Brazil, on the other hand, is doing it right and using sugar cane, which is easier to process and much more efficient in terms of resource use to produce a certain amount of sugar (way sweeter than corn...). The US and Canada would be doing the same thing if not for some political bull****. In vehicles that can run it, sugar cane-derived E85 is much cheaper and has an overall lower environmental impact than running pure gasoline or E10.
Brazil, on the other hand, is doing it right and using sugar cane, which is easier to process and much more efficient in terms of resource use to produce a certain amount of sugar (way sweeter than corn...). The US and Canada would be doing the same thing if not for some political bull****. In vehicles that can run it, sugar cane-derived E85 is much cheaper and has an overall lower environmental impact than running pure gasoline or E10.
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO from a 91 Comanche.
Got a techie question for the oem, I know my lines, regulator, and injectors are set up for 40 psi or so, but how much can the pump generate? what are the flow/pressure numbers for an oem pump? '88 cherokee-stock in this regard. My master manual says pinching the return line could generate up to 95 psi, but that is of limited use.
::CF Moderator::
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,578
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Got a techie question for the oem, I know my lines, regulator, and injectors are set up for 40 psi or so, but how much can the pump generate? what are the flow/pressure numbers for an oem pump? '88 cherokee-stock in this regard. My master manual says pinching the return line could generate up to 95 psi, but that is of limited use.
Forced induction?
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO from a 91 Comanche.
I am going to run higher pressure, as my regulator will not work withe '99 manifold and rail, and yes, forced induction soon, but I dont want to get stranded (or a fireball) burning up my pump running 50 or 60 psi out of a corvette inline regulator, which, incidentally, costs half of what a renix rail regulator costs.
Moderator of Jeeps
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 21,029
Likes: 3
From: Frederick, MD from Cleveland, OH
Year: 1993 YJ Wrangler
Engine: 4.0 I6
I've heard good things about LII leaf sliders used in place of traditional shackles. Anybody have a long term review of them? I'm curious how long the plastic bushings last and how the product does over time as a whole.
Member
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO from a 91 Comanche.
AFPR? I know what it stands for, but why not a fixed 80 or 100 or something?
I'm not in the know, I just want to bump up the regulator pressure on my '88 XJ by 10-20 psi, I know to keep an eye on the lines and connections for bulging, leaks and other signs of possible failure, I will be using a wideband to tune for my cam and manifold swap anyway, but I am somewhat new on extensive mods, I don't know if fuel pump constant pressure ratings are typically much higher than their regulated pressures, or what the deal is, is would seem like the higher you could run the better off you'd be, better atomization, higher flow.... And if that's the case my extrapolation begs the question; Why don't manufacturer's run higher pressures?
I'm not in the know, I just want to bump up the regulator pressure on my '88 XJ by 10-20 psi, I know to keep an eye on the lines and connections for bulging, leaks and other signs of possible failure, I will be using a wideband to tune for my cam and manifold swap anyway, but I am somewhat new on extensive mods, I don't know if fuel pump constant pressure ratings are typically much higher than their regulated pressures, or what the deal is, is would seem like the higher you could run the better off you'd be, better atomization, higher flow.... And if that's the case my extrapolation begs the question; Why don't manufacturer's run higher pressures?




