Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.
Old Sep 21, 2015, 03:49 PM
How-Tos on this Topic
Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:

Browse all: General Overview
Print Wikipost

XJ Ask the Question Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 02:27 PM
  #26881  
mitchlikesbikes's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 212
Likes: 1
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Eagle564
According to he tirerack website, 33x12.50 km2s are only a couple pounds lighter then the 35x12.50s. So would that mean it would be just as strenuous on the tranny to have the 33x12.50 as the 35s? With stock gearing that is.
a couple of pounds can make a lot of difference if it's further away from the axis of rotation (like it is in this case). plus the added weight isn't the only issue. the larger tires gear down the transmission and put more of a load on the engine
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 02:28 PM
  #26882  
Lowrange2's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Eagle564
According to he tirerack website, 33x12.50 km2s are only a couple pounds lighter then the 35x12.50s. So would that mean it would be just as strenuous on the tranny to have the 33x12.50 as the 35s? With stock gearing that is.
Weight isn't the only determining factor. The larger the tire the more leverage it takes to turn the tire. So, no. The 35 will still be way worse on stock gearing.
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 02:31 PM
  #26883  
Eagle564's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by mitchlikesbikes
a couple of pounds can make a lot of difference if it's further away from the axis of rotation (like it is in this case). plus the added weight isn't the only issue. the larger tires gear down the transmission and put more of a load on the engine
Originally Posted by lowrange2
Weight isn't the only determining factor. The larger the tire the more leverage it takes to turn the tire. So, no. The 35 will still be way worse on stock gearing.
Oh ok. I figured there was more to it but weight seemed more a factor in my mind. Well ill go ahead and get the 33x12.50s. Thanks guys.
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 02:41 PM
  #26884  
brdavis9's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
From: Spokane WA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: ERH 4.0L Power Tech I-6 (HO)
Default

Originally Posted by Eagle564
According to he tirerack website, 33x12.50 km2s are only a couple pounds lighter then the 35x12.50s. So would that mean it would be just as strenuous on the tranny to have the 33x12.50 as the 35s? With stock gearing that is.
Its not all about the weight when it comes to "strenuous": it can be more about the forces that are exerted on the end of what engineers call "moment arms".

Think of a moment arm like you would a lever (and fulcrum).

If I need to lift something straight off the ground, I may be a weak-armed couch potato weenie, but I can get a long bar, put a fulcrum between me and that thing I want to lift, and "lever it" up: the longer the lever, the less force I have to exert. My weak arms and a suitable lever are going to trump your body-builder physique every time lol. (A lever is a force multiplier.)

So when something is wider, the forces that are exerted are somewhat akin to this (well, conceptually). Your wider wheels, even at the same weight, are going be "moment arms" - and force multipliers - like a lever would be.

ALL other things being equal, weight matters (ask any pro bicyclist: humans can only put out about a third horsepower continuous, so any reduction you can do to the wheel weight is a VERY good thing). Given two vehicles with the same suspension geometry, the same horsepower, and same rotational diameters, the lighter tire is going to allow faster acceleration (and in essence, at least, due to frictional losses, we're either accelerating - well, to some degree - or slowing down: there's nothing in between). Lighter tires and wheels "win".

But stresses that result in typical wear-and-tear, are more dependent upon forces (like moment arms). Given the stresses exerted by wheeling, narrower is better for stuff hanging out on the end of a moment arm, that exerts lever-like forces on suspension components.

Of course, being able to float through an obstacle with an aired-down big-butt tires can be very handy in some wheeling situations lol. So it's up to you to decide where you come down on that side of the "stresses" equation.

For looks-wise, who cares: utterly personal decision (I'm a "meh" type lol). For mpg on a dd, I dunno: for rotating weight, lighter is better, and you don't have to worry about wheeling type stresses so much though.

YMMV (pun very much intended, woot).
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 03:01 PM
  #26885  
Eagle564's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by brdavis9
Its not all about the weight when it comes to "strenuous": it can be more about the forces that are exerted on the end of what engineers call "moment arms".

Think of a moment arm like you would a lever (and fulcrum).

If I need to lift something straight off the ground, I may be a weak-armed couch potato weenie, but I can get a long bar, put a fulcrum between me and that thing I want to lift, and "lever it" up: the longer the lever, the less force I have to exert. My weak arms and a suitable lever are going to trump your body-builder physique every time lol. (A lever is a force multiplier.)

So when something is wider, the forces that are exerted are somewhat akin to this (well, conceptually). Your wider wheels, even at the same weight, are going be "moment arms" - and force multipliers - like a lever would be.

ALL other things being equal, weight matters (ask any pro bicyclist: humans can only put out about a third horsepower continuous, so any reduction you can do to the wheel weight is a VERY good thing). Given two vehicles with the same suspension geometry, the same horsepower, and same rotational diameters, the lighter tire is going to allow faster acceleration (and in essence, at least, due to frictional losses, we're either accelerating - well, to some degree - or slowing down: there's nothing in between). Lighter tires and wheels "win".

But stresses that result in typical wear-and-tear, are more dependent upon forces (like moment arms). Given the stresses exerted by wheeling, narrower is better for stuff hanging out on the end of a moment arm, that exerts lever-like forces on suspension components.

Of course, being able to float through an obstacle with an aired-down big-butt tires can be very handy in some wheeling situations lol. So it's up to you to decide where you come down on that side of the "stresses" equation.

For looks-wise, who cares: utterly personal decision (I'm a "meh" type lol). For mpg on a dd, I dunno: for rotating weight, lighter is better, and you don't have to worry about wheeling type stresses so much though.

YMMV (pun very much intended, woot).
Well that is very informational lol. Im gonna save that info for future reference actually. I dunno what size im going to get, 10.50s or 12.50s is a tough choice.
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 03:02 PM
  #26886  
Lowrange2's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
Default

10.50's look better on a DD, IMO.
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 03:15 PM
  #26887  
brdavis9's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
From: Spokane WA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: ERH 4.0L Power Tech I-6 (HO)
Default

Originally Posted by lowrange2
10.50's look better on a DD, IMO.
x2
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 03:22 PM
  #26888  
Eagle564's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Ya 10.50s would be fine until i get a 8.8 and regear. Bad thing is im gonna be at like 5.5"s of lift thanks to RE being so tall
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 03:23 PM
  #26889  
Lowrange2's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Eagle564
Ya 10.50s would be fine until i get a 8.8 and regear. Bad thing is im gonna be at like 5.5"s of lift thanks to RE being so tall
What difference will the 8.8 and gearing make between 10.5 and 12.5? Stock gearing is going to suck either way.
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 03:25 PM
  #26890  
1976Mustang's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 2
From: Colorado
Year: 1992 Cherokee Sport
Engine: Bone-Stock 242
Default

Originally Posted by Eagle564
Ya 10.50s would be fine until i get a 8.8 and regear. Bad thing is im gonna be at like 5.5"s of lift thanks to RE being so tall
10.5 would be the tire width, you'll be fine with any width on any axle.
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 03:34 PM
  #26891  
Eagle564's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by 1976Mustang
10.5 would be the tire width, you'll be fine with any width on any axle.
I meant as in its fine with the stock gearing. And since its a dd.

And when i get an 8.8 it will be geared and all ill need is the front geared. I figure 10.50s will be nicer to the mpg and tranny then 12.50s
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 03:35 PM
  #26892  
brdavis9's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 242
Likes: 1
From: Spokane WA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: ERH 4.0L Power Tech I-6 (HO)
Default

Originally Posted by Eagle564
Well that is very informational lol. Im gonna save that info for future reference actually. I dunno what size im going to get, 10.50s or 12.50s is a tough choice.
Thanks.

It sometimes isn't obvious to people, the bit about longer levers needing less force to do "stuff" ...all weight is NOT equal LOL.

If you put weight way out on the end of an axle, for example, the force applied at the outside edge at that point (i.e., the tip of the moment arm if you will) puts entirely disproportionate stress for the given weight you're talking about (think: weak-armed me at the end of a long lever).

So two pounds at the extreme end of an axle puts way more stress on the axle assembly than two pounds at the center of the axle assembly. Like a long lever would.

...but it's mostly when additional angular forces are also put on that end-of-axle component, that crap happens (sometimes, quite spectacularly lol). It's not the fault of the original engineer (and engineering design) that someone later decides to switch to a component (wider wheel and tire), that puts, say, 50% or more (whatever) moment-arm type stress on what was previously a perfectly adequate component, and it breaks.

...which doesn't even add Murphy to the mix LOLOL.
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 07:51 PM
  #26893  
adarling's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Temecula CA
Year: 2005
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.7L Hemi
Default Jeep 2005 noise from front wheel area

I am getting a banging around noise coming out of the front wheel area. The strange thing is that it starts happening after I make a really long drive or the time when I towed something heavy. Then after a week of so, it just diappears again. Now, it will only make this noise when you are going 30-35 and you are going straight and you let off the gas. Sometimes it will cause the wheel to bounce around a bit and cause vibration up into the steering wheel. I theorized that it could be a bad wheel bearing and that a bad bearing would jam up in there until you really put it under load or took a long trip. Replaced it, but it still makes the noise. Kind of like a shaft being loose and bouncing around inside a hub. So... I am wondering if it could be a half shaft gone bad (4WD) or maybe the shock or some part of the suspension (but why wouldn't it do it all the time???) Maybe even something going on in the trans axle, but I don't think it would cause as radical a vibration in the wheel area. Any suggestions???
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 07:53 PM
  #26894  
pipeliner's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default help

hello. I have a 99 jeep grand cherokee with the full time 4x4 and there is a bad vibration in the front end almost like the front drive shaft is bent but only happens at 50mph or above. have checked the front axle cv joint and all the ujoints could it be the transfer case locking up.
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 07:59 PM
  #26895  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by adarling
I am getting a banging around noise coming out of the front wheel area. The strange thing is that it starts happening after I make a really long drive or the time when I towed something heavy. Then after a week of so, it just diappears again. Now, it will only make this noise when you are going 30-35 and you are going straight and you let off the gas. Sometimes it will cause the wheel to bounce around a bit and cause vibration up into the steering wheel. I theorized that it could be a bad wheel bearing and that a bad bearing would jam up in there until you really put it under load or took a long trip. Replaced it, but it still makes the noise. Kind of like a shaft being loose and bouncing around inside a hub. So... I am wondering if it could be a half shaft gone bad (4WD) or maybe the shock or some part of the suspension (but why wouldn't it do it all the time???) Maybe even something going on in the trans axle, but I don't think it would cause as radical a vibration in the wheel area. Any suggestions???
I would definitely crawl under there and start finding out what's loose or worn. Shocks, steering, and control arms are all suspect... at least I think WKs have those. This subforum is for the XJ Cherokee from 1984 - 2001, you will find people talking about your vehicle (WK Grand Cherokee) in this subforum: https://www.cherokeeforum.com/f5/



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.