Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: General Overview
- Jeep Grand Cherokee WJ 1999 to 2004 Crash Test and Safety Ratings
Important Information to help you understand your Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Browse all: General Overview
XJ Ask the Question Thread
Is this why Wranglers get worse gas mileage as well? How Wranglers differ from XJ's..... Does the Wrangler drivetrain have a significant difference in the gearing ratios? It just seems like Wranglers are much more "torquey" than a Cherokee. They seem more like "truck trucks" than an XJ ?
Are Grand Cherokees as reliable as XJ's ? They seem to be a totally different grade of car for the SUV/soccer mom set. Are they worse? More bloated? Why don't more people mod the Grand Cherokee and ignore the extras? Heavier? More expensive? The forums seem to be hugely slanted towards XJ's where GC's seem to be disposable SUV's.
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,825
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Year: '99 and '91
Model: Cherokee
Originally Posted by BimmerJeeper
Is this why Wranglers get worse gas mileage as well? How Wranglers differ from XJ's..... Does the Wrangler drivetrain have a significant difference in the gearing ratios?
I don't think so. Most YJs around here are 4cyl Manuals, and I think they are heavier. So they may be underpowered and get worse mpgs.
It just seems like Wranglers are much more "torquey" than a Cherokee. They seem more like "truck trucks" than an XJ ?
Well they have a frame
I don't think so. Most YJs around here are 4cyl Manuals, and I think they are heavier. So they may be underpowered and get worse mpgs.
It just seems like Wranglers are much more "torquey" than a Cherokee. They seem more like "truck trucks" than an XJ ?
Well they have a frame
Originally Posted by BimmerJeeper
Are Grand Cherokees as reliable as XJ's ?
IMO no.
The V8 ZJs have a POS tranny
They seem to be a totally different grade of car for the SUV/soccer mom set. Are they worse?
Yes.
More bloated?
Yes.
Why don't more people mod the Grand Cherokee and ignore the extras?
They suck
Heavier?
Yes
More expensive?
Yes.
The forums seem to be hugely slanted towards XJ's where GC's seem to be disposable SUV's.
Yes. Kinda. But that's a statement.
IMO no.
The V8 ZJs have a POS tranny
They seem to be a totally different grade of car for the SUV/soccer mom set. Are they worse?
Yes.
More bloated?
Yes.
Why don't more people mod the Grand Cherokee and ignore the extras?
They suck
Heavier?
Yes
More expensive?
Yes.
The forums seem to be hugely slanted towards XJ's where GC's seem to be disposable SUV's.
Yes. Kinda. But that's a statement.
Moderator of Jeeps
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 21,029
Likes: 3
From: Frederick, MD from Cleveland, OH
Year: 1993 YJ Wrangler
Engine: 4.0 I6
Originally Posted by DieselD
Answers above
Moderator of Jeeps
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 21,029
Likes: 3
From: Frederick, MD from Cleveland, OH
Year: 1993 YJ Wrangler
Engine: 4.0 I6
Originally Posted by DieselD
You are right sir. It is biased. 
But I do think the v8 zj tranny is a heap of scrap metal.

But I do think the v8 zj tranny is a heap of scrap metal.
CF Veteran
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 10,447
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, MD
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Well I own both an xj and a wj. In my opinion wj is just to nice to offroad with. Now I have had mine through mud and snow, and it does perform well. But I would never take it were I take my xj.
Herp Derp Jerp

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Nope, old pads. I just yanked the calipers off to clean the rotors and fix the snapped bolt.
Gearing ratio is the same in Wranglers actually, but you'll see weight differences sometimes. The primary reason that Wranglers get worse mileage is their shape. The XJ is commonly called a "flying brick" but it's much better aerodynamically than a TJ. At least our windshields are slanted, and even curved!!!
IMO depends on the Grand Cherokee. I view ZJs as just a heavier XJ with rear coils... depending on options. Certain parts are notoriously bad, like their auto transmission, D44a, and I think one year came with CV front axles. A ZJ or WJ can be built but you can pretty much say that about any vehicle. An XJ is lighter and cheaper, and earns more "truck" cred for fewer luxury features. Manual windows, locks, transmission, and NP231 lend to that idea. Aftermarket support I believe is a reflection of this: All the guys who were concerned about price vs. breaking it while wheeling take the XJ path, and people buying "cars" like soccer moms just went to the Grands - not necessarily that one is inherently superior, as there are trade-offs.
Personally I think WJs look like bloated whales and the WK/WK2s are just an embarrassment to "SUVs". More like "SVs", there's no U left in a vehicle with 20" chrome wheels, electronic transfer case, and this SRT8 bullshyte
Is this why Wranglers get worse gas mileage as well? How Wranglers differ from XJ's..... Does the Wrangler drivetrain have a significant difference in the gearing ratios? It just seems like Wranglers are much more "torquey" than a Cherokee. They seem more like "truck trucks" than an XJ ?
Are Grand Cherokees as reliable as XJ's ? They seem to be a totally different grade of car for the SUV/soccer mom set. Are they worse? More bloated? Why don't more people mod the Grand Cherokee and ignore the extras? Heavier? More expensive? The forums seem to be hugely slanted towards XJ's where GC's seem to be disposable SUV's.
Personally I think WJs look like bloated whales and the WK/WK2s are just an embarrassment to "SUVs". More like "SVs", there's no U left in a vehicle with 20" chrome wheels, electronic transfer case, and this SRT8 bullshyte
Last edited by salad; Oct 27, 2012 at 02:25 PM.
Moderator of Jeeps
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 21,029
Likes: 3
From: Frederick, MD from Cleveland, OH
Year: 1993 YJ Wrangler
Engine: 4.0 I6
Originally Posted by my89xj
There's a guy on Craiglist selling an xj brush guard with poweder coat coming off and mounting tabs bent, he's asking $200. I was going to offer $100




