Stock Grand Cherokee Tech. All ZJ/WJ/WK Non-modified/stock questions go here! ZJ (93-98), WJ (99-04), WK (05+)
All ZJ/WJ/WK specific tech questions asked here!

Purchasing help.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 09:59 AM
  #1  
01raptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Holly mi
Model: Cherokee
Default Purchasing help. (ZJ/WJ)

My wife and I have been looking for an XJ to be our new toy/project. We haven't had much luck finding one that isn't rotted to hell, here in Michigan. How ever we noticed that there are piles of GCs that are in nice shape here. I have been doing lots of reading on here to educate my self but I could still use some advise from the experts. What ever I will get will see a fair amount of time on the street as well as on trails, mud and sand dunes, probably 60/40 split street to off road. I don't want the 4.7 v8 but I haven't found much info comparing the 4.0 to the 5.2, performance, reliability, ease to maintain. I know the 5.2 models come with Dana 44s which seems like a bonus to me. I always liked the way the WJ look but I get the feeling that there not as good of a choice for a project vehicle as the ZJ, no 44, seems to be less aftermarket support etc, am I wrong with this assumption. Are there any years to stay away of? I would like to do a 3 to 4 inch lift with what ever tire I can fit with out trimming. We would like to spend around $4500 to purchase the jeep, I can handle mechanical issues but don't want to have to deal with rust, and would like to keep the miles at 150k or under. Any tips or advise would be great thanks fellas.

Last edited by 01raptor; Mar 2, 2013 at 10:40 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 10:13 AM
  #2  
Dan91's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
From: Williston, North Dakota
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

I had a 96 ZJ 5.2l. It was a great Jeep, lots of power, comfortable ride. The 5.2 is known for being pretty darn reliable, mine had 280k on it still runing fine. Also the D44 in them were aluminum housings, not as strong and not nearly as much aftermarket support.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2013 | 02:08 PM
  #3  
01raptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Holly mi
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Dan91
I had a 96 ZJ 5.2l. It was a great Jeep, lots of power, comfortable ride. The 5.2 is known for being pretty darn reliable, mine had 280k on it still runing fine. Also the D44 in them were aluminum housings, not as strong and not nearly as much aftermarket support.
So does that make the 44 not much of an upgrade over the 35?
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2013 | 11:29 AM
  #4  
01raptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Holly mi
Model: Cherokee
Default

TTT.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2013 | 05:13 PM
  #5  
Bustedback's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,367
Likes: 23
From: Oroville, CA
Year: 1995
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 with all of the noise and clatter
Default

The 44a used in the 96-98 V8 ZJs have little to no aftermarket support and nothing from a regular D44 will swap to a 44a. As you know, the 4.0 is a rock solid engine with outstanding reliability. The 5.2 is just as reliable as the 4.0, it's a great engine.

Last edited by Bustedback; Mar 3, 2013 at 06:43 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2013 | 06:41 PM
  #6  
dnuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 960
Likes: 3
From: Ahwatukee, Phoenix, AZ
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

id get a 5.2. i might be biased though

the d44a is a strong axle, alot stronger than most people give it credit for. the only downside is that if you ever want to add a locker, IIRC you only have 2 options. but the d35 doesnt stand up well to being locked (from what ive read anyway, mine is still open). the 44a only came in 96-98 ZJs with the 5.2 or in 98 the 5.9. 93-95 ZJs all had the 35. some guys claim at some point there were some ZJs that left the factory with chrysler 8.25 rear ends, but ive never seen one or seen any real proof.

the 5.2 is just as bulletproof as the 4.0 as long as its been maintained. its not unheard of for them to go over 300k miles.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2013 | 07:23 PM
  #7  
01raptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Holly mi
Model: Cherokee
Default

Thanks for the help fellas, I put a down payment on a 97 zj today. It has the 5.2, and is mostly very clean other than a small rust spot on the front left fender and a dent on the rear bumper and hatch. I'll get that stuff taken care of and start the modding.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2013 | 06:54 AM
  #8  
dave1123's Avatar
Old fart with a wrench
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,398
Likes: 741
From: Manlius, east of Syracuse, NY
Year: 2000 XJ Sport & WJ Laredo
Model: Grand Cherokee (WJ)
Engine: 4.0L
Default

I can't stress enough to check the rear lower trailing arms where they mount to the body. My 97 ZJ's broke out of the body mountings(frame). After I put 100 lbs of steel into it, the front mounts tore out. This from the "Salt City", Syracuse NY. Of course, it had 197K on it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pathfinder74
Jeep Builds
19
Nov 3, 2015 04:30 PM
Morris4x4Center
Vendor Showcase
0
Sep 22, 2015 10:41 AM
xjnoah
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
0
Sep 16, 2015 02:29 PM
Ibanezz
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
24
Sep 10, 2015 07:15 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 PM.