KL Cherokee Tech KL (14+)
2014 Cherokee Forum for all new KL and Cherokee Trailhawk discussion and tech information.

2014 Trailhawk

Old Oct 20, 2014 | 01:09 PM
  #286  
metalwonzero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: TN
Year: 2014
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.4 Tiger Shark
Default

Originally Posted by JWheeler
Anyone have a stock xj and live near the op? Let's get it done.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 01:14 PM
  #287  
metalwonzero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: TN
Year: 2014
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.4 Tiger Shark
Default

Originally Posted by lighttoast
Over the life of mine (~10000 miles) I'm averaging 22.5. Driving to work and back and just typical driving (35-45 mph with stoplights every few miles) I get around 23. I average 25 on the highway (65-75 mph). With a kayak on top I average 24 highway. With a bass boat in tow I average 15 highway. The best I've seen is 30 and that was averaging 55 on flat flat flat roads with no traffic and no stopping.

That's in a v6 trailhawk. So yes, I do see a vast improvement over my XJ which saw 23 (averaged 17-18) at best when it was stock.
thats not bad at all. these things are heavy too.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 01:26 PM
  #288  
metalwonzero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: TN
Year: 2014
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.4 Tiger Shark
Default

Originally Posted by cruiser54
I couldn't agree more.......
now its boiling down to people wanting to disconnect the sways. do this and that.. .. lol
i have planned on just hitting an ING~NERT trail when i go.. and picking out a modded jeep to tail.. and let that tell the tale.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 06:04 AM
  #289  
south599's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0I
Default

Originally Posted by lighttoast
Over the life of mine (~10000 miles) I'm averaging 22.5. Driving to work and back and just typical driving (35-45 mph with stoplights every few miles) I get around 23. I average 25 on the highway (65-75 mph). With a kayak on top I average 24 highway. With a bass boat in tow I average 15 highway. The best I've seen is 30 and that was averaging 55 on flat flat flat roads with no traffic and no stopping.

That's in a v6 trailhawk. So yes, I do see a vast improvement over my XJ which saw 23 (averaged 17-18) at best when it was stock.

Now these are some cool numbers! Glad to here the epa numbers werent just pulled out of thin air. My grandparents owned my xj before me and took it to canada a few times they said they got 26 mpg a couple times. Im assuming thats at perfect flat roads, etc.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 06:46 AM
  #290  
SG Mason's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Iroquois Ontario Canada
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by south599
Now these are some cool numbers! Glad to here the epa numbers werent just pulled out of thin air. My grandparents owned my xj before me and took it to canada a few times they said they got 26 mpg a couple times. Im assuming thats at perfect flat roads, etc.
Could be that they were using imperial MPG and not US MPG, that works out to 26.42 MPG because the imperial gallon is slightly larger

I don't thing the KL/XJ compression will ever happen, mainly because the chances of finding a bone stock, like new Up Country would be darn near impossible, and if one was ever found there is no doubt that the owner would not take it wheeling
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 10:45 AM
  #291  
metalwonzero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: TN
Year: 2014
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.4 Tiger Shark
Default

Originally Posted by SG Mason
Could be that they were using imperial MPG and not US MPG, that works out to 26.42 MPG because the imperial gallon is slightly larger

I don't thing the KL/XJ compression will ever happen, mainly because the chances of finding a bone stock, like new Up Country would be darn near impossible, and if one was ever found there is no doubt that the owner would not take it wheeling
yer breaking my heart!
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 10:59 AM
  #292  
Watchful's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 127
Likes: 2
From: DuPage County, Illinois
Year: 2014
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 3.2-liter V-6
Default

Originally Posted by lighttoast
...I'm averaging 22.5. Driving to work and back and just typical driving (35-45 mph with stoplights every few miles) I get around 23. I average 25 on the highway (65-75 mph)...That's in a v6 trailhawk.
Same here: V6 Trailhawk, averaging 22.5-23 on the roads, and 25 on the highway.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 03:44 PM
  #293  
SG Mason's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Iroquois Ontario Canada
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by metalwonzero
yer breaking my heart!
Sorry the truth hurts

I would love to see a non bias side by side of the new and old Cherokees. I am on the old style side of the fence, but it is all because of the looks, not because I think XJs are better than the KLs. The KL should be the better machine just because of the 13 years of technology advances. Just think in 13+ years people will be saying the KL is better than the 2027 Cherokee and the old XJs will just be faded and rusted memories
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 04:39 PM
  #294  
metalwonzero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: TN
Year: 2014
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.4 Tiger Shark
Default

Originally Posted by SG Mason
Sorry the truth hurts

I would love to see a non bias side by side of the new and old Cherokees. I am on the old style side of the fence, but it is all because of the looks, not because I think XJs are better than the KLs. The KL should be the better machine just because of the 13 years of technology advances. Just think in 13+ years people will be saying the KL is better than the 2027 Cherokee and the old XJs will just be faded and rusted memories
before i purchased mine.. and tested it.. i thought the same thing.. "wonder if it will go? will it be as good as my xj was? i cant say for sure its better.. but so far its not falling short in any aspect.. (still have to test it in mud) and not everyone is willing to wheel a new ride to find out.. me, i think a shiny skid plate is sexy.. wurd..
yep... thats what i am seeking.. a non biased test.. in several terrains this is why the offroad park would be better suited than just an old trail somewhere.. plus their will be plenty to witness the event!

Last edited by metalwonzero; Oct 21, 2014 at 04:41 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 05:19 PM
  #295  
DieselD's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,825
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Year: '99 and '91
Model: Cherokee
Default

You might not be able to find someone with an Up Country in shape that's willing to test it. What about someone with a Cherokee that's modified similar to an Up Country? 1-2" max, no rear sway, 30x9.5s, posi or lunch box locker rear, skid plates. It'd be a pretty comparative test.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2014 | 04:44 AM
  #296  
metalwonzero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: TN
Year: 2014
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.4 Tiger Shark
Default

Originally Posted by DieselD
You might not be able to find someone with an Up Country in shape that's willing to test it. What about someone with a Cherokee that's modified similar to an Up Country? 1-2" max, no rear sway, 30x9.5s, posi or lunch box locker rear, skid plates. It'd be a pretty comparative test.
sure why not. . im starting to think i will find a unicorn and a yetti in my back yard before i will find the elusive UP Country..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
riparianbarbarian
Introductions
3
Oct 23, 2015 03:57 PM
sbc003
Introductions
2
Sep 27, 2015 11:13 AM
njfastlife
Cherokee Chat
5
Sep 19, 2015 09:14 PM
CudaDave
KL Cherokee Tech
2
Sep 7, 2015 07:57 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM.