Wild Motor dreams..

nick_n_ii · 2009-12-15 01:59:26

hoverjeep. 9225 "Obstacle? What obstacle?!?!"

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

12-15-2009, 11:36 AM

#16

nasonguy

Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2009

Posts: 775

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Year: 1998

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0 HO

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewXJaddict

hoverjeep.

Attachment 9225

"Obstacle? What obstacle?!?!"

Reply Like

12-15-2009, 12:51 PM

#17

Donnie_K

CF Veteran

Join Date: Jun 2009

Location: Columbus, Ohio

Posts: 2,173

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Year: 1997

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0, comp cam, 99 intake, apn header, neon injectors, Thunderbolt 2.5" High Flow Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by nick_n_ii

Remember this about motors, not would they would do to a XJ.

Anything is possible with enough time and talent.

I know... and IMO the 4.0 was one of the most reliable engines ever made... hell of a base to build on.

Reply Like

12-15-2009, 01:51 PM

#18

89Laredo

CF Veteran

Join Date: May 2009

Posts: 10,280

Likes: 0

Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Year: 1996

Engine: 4.0

Something thats actually possible:
4.6 Stroker w/ a supercharger or turbo. AW4 With lots of upgrades and a good shift kit, D60 full float rear, D44 front, NP242 Out of a Cummins, 35s/cut fenders, and 4.88s...

What I would LIKE to do:
Cummins 4bt or 6bt=More torque, better mileage..
383 stroker/454, 4spd manual, large cam, open headers=CRAPPY GAS MILEAGE, but more fun!

Reply Like

12-15-2009, 02:11 PM

#19

96xj4x4

CF Veteran

Join Date: Nov 2009

Location: Manahawkin New Jersey

Posts: 1,291

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Year: 96'

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0 160k banks header dumping after the cat

i'd have to agree with everybody voting on the 4bt the 3.9l cummins. with upgrades to the turbos and fuel systems this things will make 500ft lbs of torque. the 6 cylinder 5.9 or 6.7 is just to big of an engine IMO my family uses 3 in our tow fleet.