Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

axle upgrade. HELP?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #31  
OttawaXJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, on
Default

He might be confused, all I've been able to find is 4.10s and 4.56s. Personally I'm going for 4.56s but I wheel almost every weekend when I have a Jeep. Sadly I'm going crazy right now not having one.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 01:48 PM
  #32  
SuperGlue's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 504
Likes: 3
From: Forest Grove, OR
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Inline 6, 4.ol
Default

I agree that the 44 is completely unnecessary for 33's, but ****, if you have the time and money then go for it is how I see it. I have heard from a few people that the 8.25 is comparable with a 44, and heard the same thing about the 8.8. But sense I have never ran any of those axles and am still running a turdy 5, i dont like to pass along hear say is all. just personal experience! =D
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 02:00 PM
  #33  
harley182's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Talking

thats kinda what Im thinkin. Im just going to keep my eye out for a good deal on a d44 or a good 8.25. Im not worried about fab work on the d44. I just want the strongest axle for what I need. I dont need to be rock krawling. Im going to be using my xj as a dd while adventuring out on the weekends. Im not worried about mpg's that much so when I gear it IM thinking 4.56's. But who knows. Thats all in the future. right now Im broke haha But thanks to everybody who helped shed some light on the subject. I know what Im going to be looking out for. I just need to wait until april when I finish college to start really spending money haha
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 02:36 PM
  #34  
Char92dj8's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by harley182
yea dude Im wanting to get arb's front and rear. Im just worried about my front axle being toast. Ive been told with 33's or larger that they cant take it. But thanks. Im pretty sure Im goin with the 8.8 in the rear
Im running 36s on my front 30... no problems what so ever.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #35  
07Negative's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Default

Read this fellas page. http://www.ericsxj.com/
Dana44 is hardly stronger then a 8.25 and a waste of money. If your going to go through all the fab work and sourcing a axle. You might as well go D60 or a ford 9". That's some strong stuff. But over kill.
Built 8.25 and D30 will take 33's with no problems. Even 35's.
I always hear these dudes (read as douche bags) crap talkin these axles. But Yet I see plenty of people running them. I have em and they work completely fine. I don't have a locker in the front yet. But I will once I start building mine. With manual lockouts and a Detroit locker. If your worried about the axle housing. Put a truss on it. You can build a killer D30 for about $2500 with top of the line products, locker, manual lockouts, truss, chromoly inner, gearing, and even a WJ brake upgrade.
All you need for the 8.25 is chromoly inners, locker, gearing and maybe disc brake upgrade. 8.25 can easily be found and you can build it while you drive on ur D35.
I run a Detroit locker in my 8.25. I wouldn't change it out for anything.
For gearing. I'd say 4.10's are ideal. Good gas mileage and power. Good for wheelin.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #36  
Rock Toy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 3
From: Cove, OR
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by SuperGlue
I agree that the 44 is completely unnecessary for 33's, but ****, if you have the time and money then go for it is how I see it. I have heard from a few people that the 8.25 is comparable with a 44, and heard the same thing about the 8.8. But sense I have never ran any of those axles and am still running a turdy 5, i dont like to pass along hear say is all. just personal experience! =D
The Chrysler 8.25 and the Dana 44 are comparable. The Explorer 8.8 axle is more closely comparable to a Dana 60 than the Dana 44. If someone plans on changing ratios to 4.10 just find a 31 spline, disc brake, 4.10 geared 8.8 axle. It will cost less to mount the axle in the Cherokee than it would to do a ring & pinion change.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #37  
jake149's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: chesterfield, michigan
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 6 cyl.
Default

Just a quick question. So you guys are saying that the Dana 30 up front will handle 33's?
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2010 | 11:39 AM
  #38  
Silver60th's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Lubbock, Tx.
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Yup, the Dana 30 up front will handle 33's. I would suggest a HP Dana 30 as opposed to a LP D30, but either one will help.

And there seems to be some misinformation regarding the Ford 8.8...



The 8.8 is stronger than the D44, especially the later models with higher spline counts.

Also, the 8.8 can be had from the factory with disc brakes and 4.10's, and there are a helluva lot more left than D44's to be had.




And the 6200+ is because the testing magazine couldn't break the axle. They stopped there.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2010 | 11:48 AM
  #39  
jake149's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: chesterfield, michigan
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 6 cyl.
Default

How come the HP more so the lp?

And thanks for the help on the other question
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #40  
RENIXBEAST's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: Effingham, N.H.
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Better ground clearance and more importantly better drive line angle.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2010 | 12:02 PM
  #41  
Silver60th's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Lubbock, Tx.
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

"A low pinion in the front drives on the coast or beveled side of the gear and under higher loads, the pinion teeth are forced out of the contact area into the higher thinner edges of the teeth and that's what tends to destroy the gear teeth.

A high pinion on the other hand drives on the flat side of the tooth and the contact pattern tends to remain static regardless of the loads placed on it.

High pinion= driven on the drive side of the ring gear teeth.

Low pinion= driven on the coast side of the ring gear teeth." (mrblaine, Jeepforum)

The HP30 also uses shims for pinion preload instead of a crush sleeve. It's more stable and easier to deal with as well.


Overall, because of the gear setup and the driveline angle change it is a little bit better. Would I spend more than 250-300 obtaining one if I had a LP? Probably not. It's not that big of a difference. Just something worth noting.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2010 | 12:07 PM
  #42  
OttawaXJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, on
Default

Originally Posted by jake149
Just a quick question. So you guys are saying that the Dana 30 up front will handle 33's?
Yes, It'll handle 35s comfortably, 37s are pushing it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlvdKreeper
Cherokee Chat
17
Sep 12, 2019 05:01 AM
1998CherokeeXJ
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
20
Nov 21, 2015 07:49 AM
64dodge
Stock Grand Cherokee Tech. All ZJ/WJ/WK Non-modified/stock questions go here!
3
Sep 30, 2015 05:50 PM
ATNC325
Axles/Tires/Wheels
0
Sep 28, 2015 10:01 AM
mkoutney12
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
3
Sep 13, 2015 12:22 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.