Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

1989 cherokee whats the difference

Old Jul 17, 2011 | 05:26 PM
  #1  
clark0031's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: bend or.
Model: Cherokee
Default 1989 cherokee whats the difference

I've owned one 89 cherokee and it was great. Whats the difference in motors. 4.0 and say a 92 4.0. Looking to another cherokee and want to know if I should be looking at a 89 or am I just being weird. Want to use this one as a exploring the back woods kind of rig.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 06:35 PM
  #2  
5-90's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 23
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: AMC242
Default

Mechanically? Rather little.

In terms of engine management, search up "RENIX" here and pillage through the results.

For the 6-242:
1987-1990 = RENIX
1991-1995 = OBD-I
1996-2006 = OBD-II

The 6-242 ended regular production at the end of the 2006 model year.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 06:52 PM
  #3  
excess650's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 746
Likes: 3
From: here today gone tomorrow
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

The 91(?) and earlier were RENIX, so different electronically than the 92 and later. This means that the FI won't swap over, cooling systems are different (open vs closed), etc. The RENIX were rated 170hp while the 4.0L HO were rated 190hp or higher depending upon year.

The 92 no longer has Comfort/Power mode selector for the AW4 trans, and doesn't have the vacuum motor disconnect on the RH side of the front axle.

Last edited by excess650; Jul 17, 2011 at 06:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 08:00 PM
  #4  
clark0031's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: bend or.
Model: Cherokee
Default renix motor

The renix motor sounds better if Im reading info correctly. Less computer parts.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 11:49 PM
  #5  
Flash1034's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Liter
Default

No. Not really.

Flash
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 01:34 AM
  #6  
odgreen's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 15,581
Likes: 8
From: some small town oregon
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I'm swapping my renix setup for a 91 ho if that helps. The renix system sucks...

pieced together on my iPhone using my uber l337 hax skilz.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 02:14 AM
  #7  
Slick761's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 1
From: Nor-Cal
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: The venerable 4.0
Default

Why does everyone hate on renix!! It's a good system! What's your beef??
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 08:19 AM
  #8  
jomps's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
From: knoxville, tn
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 98 4.0 I6
Default

my first xj was renix and I liked it alot but then got an obd2 and I could really get on it
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 08:55 AM
  #9  
mike mike's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
Year: 94
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

RENIX- more vacuum lines, more complicated system, close cooling system, vac disco front diff, less horsepower
HO-less vacuum lines, simpler system, open cooling system. non disco front diff, more horsepower.

You can correct the cooling, diff and HP, but you put a lot of time and $$$$$$ into an Renix XJ when you can buy an HO model that already has those things for the same price. (at least in my market anyway) And that time and money could be spent on other upgrades
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 11:48 AM
  #10  
Slick761's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 1
From: Nor-Cal
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: The venerable 4.0
Default

I have put in time but not that much money. I've eliminated a lot of vacuum lines got a non disco axle and performance mods are not that hard.+ the computer will take anything I can throw at it.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 11:51 AM
  #11  
Firestorm500's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 12
Year: 2015, 2012
Model: Grand Cherokee (WK2)
Engine: 3.6L
Default

I'd leave a RENIX the way it came.

I'd also leave a '91 and later HO the way it came.

You will save yourself a lot of time, money, and frustration.

In other words, buy whichever one you want to; but leave the powertrains as they came.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 12:07 PM
  #12  
goneboating06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
From: St. George Utah
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Rebuilt Renix "Low Output" haha
Default

The renix is every bit as good as the H.O. as far as reliability is concerned. Yeah it has more vac lines then a h.o. However the vacuum system on the renix is simple and reliable. Yeah it has less hp, but if maintained and with a few simple mods you can keep up with the H.O's all day long. In fact after i got my renix rebuilt and slapped on some 703 neon injectors, i have left my friends 2003 wrangler, a 2001 and a 1996 cherokee with the h.o.'s, in the dust. Yeah the cooling system can be a pain, but with a good pressure bottle it's just fine, and if there is still a problem then it can be easily converted to a H.O. Cooling system. Is the H.O. System better, yeah, but in the renix's defense it's still a dang good motor. I have a renix and I love it, it has it's little quarks sometimes, but it has never left me stranded or given me any problems. I have also heard from several machine shops that the lower end on a renix is better. Plus with mine I am getting 19-20 mpgs so im not complaining haha. overall the H.O. Is better in some ways, but the renix is still a fantastic motor, and still just as reliable!
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 12:34 PM
  #13  
Slick761's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 1
From: Nor-Cal
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: The venerable 4.0
Default

X2 on the good mileage
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 12:45 PM
  #14  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

I like my Renix.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 12:55 PM
  #15  
Slick761's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 1
From: Nor-Cal
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: The venerable 4.0
Default

Yay everyone post in the chat area in my thread renix love!!!!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LiamLikeNeeson
Jeep Builds
18
Jan 1, 2024 02:25 AM
LiamLikeNeeson
Cherokee Chat
112
Jan 26, 2019 09:37 AM
studmuffin
Cherokee Chat
16
Sep 16, 2015 07:52 PM
Ashs1714
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
Sep 4, 2015 10:14 PM
d00med
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
3
Aug 26, 2015 12:33 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM.