KL Cherokee Tech KL (14+)
2014 Cherokee Forum for all new KL and Cherokee Trailhawk discussion and tech information.

2014 Trailhawk

Old Dec 21, 2013 | 09:01 PM
  #91  
xjheep92's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 3
From: mass
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 high output
Default

http://www.fourwheeler.com/vehicle-r...hits-the-dirt/
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 09:17 PM
  #92  
holycaveman's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,643
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Trailhawk84
How dare you! That's a straight up insult!!!

From what I have seen that Trailhawk could hang just fine with most cherokee owners off road.........just saying.

So have fun with it and don't look back.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 09:30 PM
  #93  
N20jeep's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,685
Likes: 6
From: Jacksonville, FL
Year: 92
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

So you don't like how it works. Ok. It still functions as intended.

And like I said, if you get in a situation where tires are coming off the ground . The locker in the kl will allow it to keep moving, unlike the LSD in the xj.... Which will do like a LSD does when a tire comes up... Fail to keep moving.


Don't get me wrong, I'm still not sold on a kl. But id still place it as more capable out of the box than a stock xj

Last edited by N20jeep; Dec 21, 2013 at 09:32 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 09:33 PM
  #94  
GreenClassic's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Year: 1995
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Not a big fan of the 2014s, it just has a really awkward design IMO. But I also don't really like most "SUVs" any manufacturer makes these days. But I won't be disrespectful towards the owners by calling it a POS or something stupid like that. If you don't like it, don't buy it.

The biggest problem I've seen so far is the MPG numbers people are claiming are not even close to what the sticker says. Seems they are getting only slightly better numbers than what our XJs are getting. It could just be a rocky launch. Just look how long it took for them to finally get to dealers to try and fix the issues with the 9-speed. I don't think Chrysler has fully fixed the issues, which is why people are getting such low MPG numbers. It could be something as simple as a software update to get the new Cherokee meeting their MPG goal.

It's just like any new model launch, the first ones are going to have bugs that need to be worked out.

And some of the problems it has are not exclusive to the new Cherokee. Somebody stated earlier radio issues. That is a common problem that I've seen on the Grand Cherokee as well as Ram trucks.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2013 | 09:58 PM
  #95  
Thekid320's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 416
Likes: 2
Model: Cherokee
Default

X2 on the radio issue the wife just got a new grand and the radio needs fixed
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 12:54 AM
  #96  
ohio95xj's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Dayton OH
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I help run an event called jeep jam in Wilmington Ohio every year, I really hope some KL's come out., I just really want to see some on the trail.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 05:03 AM
  #97  
Lowrange2's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
Default

lol, All this debate.

Common sense says that a brand new 2001 bone stock Upcountry XJ would be left in the dust by a 2014 bone stock Trailhawk.

The only difference being the XJ owner didn't pay quite as much so he might not be as scared to accomplish the obstacle with a little momentum.

Common sense.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 07:21 AM
  #98  
huntingman2706217's Avatar
MJ>XJ
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 17,836
Likes: 7
From: Griffin, G.A.
Year: 1990
Model: Comanche
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

We're not allowed to use common sense here... some kind of XJ pride thing that's not worth arguing lol... Most probly haven't even read on the KL other than what posted In forums on threads like this...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 07:21 AM
  #99  
cruiser54's Avatar
::CF Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,578
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Demonoid369
Speak like what? I said hell(I'm more accustomed to * things) I've seen worse on here and no one bats an eye lol are you mad because im being direct?!? You can google yourself and it'll show no one on one comparison of the two, only talk. motorweek, motortrend, etc.... Just talk and show only the kl, there has yet to be a true head to head of a fully working top shape xj(reason being is dumb to compare a broken down rig to a brand new rig) against a kl making your statement invalid and misinformation

Wrong!

There are some off-road videos featuring the Trailhawk which are quite impressive.

I'll see if I can dig them up. I agree the standard road tests are quite boring.

Here ya go:

https://www.google.com/search?q=jeep...m=122&ie=UTF-8

Last edited by cruiser54; Dec 22, 2013 at 07:23 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 08:12 AM
  #100  
speedballin's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
From: Pottstown/Boyertown, PA
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 6 cyl
Default

I think it's funny to think in the ten years since the xj has been put out. They put out a new "Cherokee" while it may not be appealing, you think it's not better than 10 years ago? Were that ****ty as a society to not be able to produce something better in ten years lol. My money is for sure on the kl

Not disagreeing with the bugs that need to be worked out as it's fresh on the market. This whole thread is full of a lot of butt hurt xj owners.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 10:04 AM
  #101  
Rogue4x4's Avatar
::CF Administrator::
Premium Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 805
From: Blunt, South Dakota
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.6 stroker
Default

Well after watching those videos, I'm not impressed. Those "trails" are so groomed, it hurt to watch. The rocky sections were as flat as possible, and they still needed a spotter? It had trouble going uphill, on a flat dirt road. Totally manufactured settings, real world trails are not going to be so forgiving. The one thing that they did get right however was calling it "the weasel"...because Jeep is trying to weasel this thing onto the market as a capable off road rig. In the other vid, with the guy from Jeep stating "it did Hell's Revenge in Moab, Utah, and it's a world famous trail", most cars can do that trail. Not very technical at all. I'll hold out to make a final judgement though, until we see some real world people on real world trails.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 10:56 AM
  #102  
95Cherokee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 3
From: Houston Tx.
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

This vid can prove the merit of traction control.

Wrangler without traction control has hell climbing hill, Range Rover with traction control goes up with no problem.

Really embarrasses the Wrangler.

Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 11:12 AM
  #103  
95Cherokee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 3
From: Houston Tx.
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I'm thinking an XJ wouldn't do much better on that hill than the Wrangler, a KL with traction control might make it up about as easy as the Rover did.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 11:45 AM
  #104  
speedballin's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
From: Pottstown/Boyertown, PA
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 6 cyl
Default

Originally Posted by 95Cherokee
This vid can prove the merit of traction control. Wrangler without traction control has hell climbing hill, Range Rover with traction control goes up with no problem. Really embarrasses the Wrangler. Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EFHu1PmHZY
Off topic but the land rovers are badass, when they uhh run lol
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 11:59 AM
  #105  
95Cherokee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 3
From: Houston Tx.
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Dear Range Rover:

Thanks for taking the skill factor out of off roading, now anyone can wheel like a pro!
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 PM.