Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: Wheels and Tires
- Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ 1993 to 1998 Tires General Information and Specs
Important information to help you understand your Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Browse all: Wheels and Tires
All Lift & Tire questions go here!!!
Beach Bum
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,123
Likes: 22
From: Cape Hatteras, North Carolina
Year: 2000 WJ
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Using the hole for stock height does not allow enough movement for full travel of a 3.5" lift leaf pack. It will work, just limits downward travel.
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,924
Likes: 203
From: Greenville, SC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Beach Bum
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,123
Likes: 22
From: Cape Hatteras, North Carolina
Year: 2000 WJ
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 1
From: Detroit, MI
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L
I have 31" BFG AT's too and they're alright on stock gears, but like SatiricalHen did, I went with alloy wheels. It was kinda crappy at first, but after upgraded injectors, a bored tb, and the SYE, I gained some of that loss back. I plan on going to 33's at some point, so I'll re-gear then.
Last edited by TFitzPat87; May 22, 2016 at 08:23 PM.
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,924
Likes: 203
From: Greenville, SC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
I have 31" BFG AT's too and they're alright on stock gears, but like SatiricalHen did, I went with alloy wheels. It was kinda crappy at first, but after upgraded injectors, a bored tb, and the SYE, I gained some of that loss back. I plan on going to 33's at some point, so I'll re-gear then.
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 1
From: Detroit, MI
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L
Bored TB is one of my favorite upgrades so far. I went 62mm. I can't speak for any other sizes, but it brought back some pep and made it harder to lay of the skinny pedal. Exhaust is next on the list but I'm not sure if I want to keep it at 2.25" or bump up to 2.5". Not looking for it to be super rumbly, just a good tone.
No, I don't lick fish.



Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 11,169
Likes: 26
From: Northern Kentucky
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
It's not so much "settling" as it is "doing what needs to be done for now and saving in the meantime for what I really want"
There are a couple of reasons:
A) Money. Sole-provider of a household with wife and 3 kids doesn't afford much extra. I do what works, and trust me... my current setup works MUCH better than the stock shackles. Are there setups out there that work better? Sure. There's always a bigger fish. I.E. your setup will never flex as well as a custom triangulated 4-link.... so why not go with that? Answer... 'cause you're happy with your setup and it works, right? OH! And you probably don't have a couple G's to drop on that setup... I'm assuming.
B) The amount of articulation in the rear of my Jeep is pretty well matched with the front. If I added the relo brackets, I'd have more in the back than in the front... and of that, I'm not a fan.
C) I absolutely HATE the look of that setup. No offense to you man, absolutely none, so please don't take it that way. Eventually, I'm going to get shackle relo brackets, but they're going to be no-lift brackets. I hate the way the ones look that just bolt into the current location of the shackle buckets. To me, it looks about as good as body lift. Not mild body lift either... we're talkin' 4" of body lift on a mid-90's chevy k1500... yeah... frame hangin' waaaay down below the body, and big gaps between the frame and bed in the wheel well.
In the meantime though, just going with a set of extended shackles offered a TREMENDOUS improvement over stock... and they were all of 25 bucks at the autoparts store.
So, while your setup is a valid option I'm simply offering readers here another one.
There are a couple of reasons:
A) Money. Sole-provider of a household with wife and 3 kids doesn't afford much extra. I do what works, and trust me... my current setup works MUCH better than the stock shackles. Are there setups out there that work better? Sure. There's always a bigger fish. I.E. your setup will never flex as well as a custom triangulated 4-link.... so why not go with that? Answer... 'cause you're happy with your setup and it works, right? OH! And you probably don't have a couple G's to drop on that setup... I'm assuming.
B) The amount of articulation in the rear of my Jeep is pretty well matched with the front. If I added the relo brackets, I'd have more in the back than in the front... and of that, I'm not a fan.
C) I absolutely HATE the look of that setup. No offense to you man, absolutely none, so please don't take it that way. Eventually, I'm going to get shackle relo brackets, but they're going to be no-lift brackets. I hate the way the ones look that just bolt into the current location of the shackle buckets. To me, it looks about as good as body lift. Not mild body lift either... we're talkin' 4" of body lift on a mid-90's chevy k1500... yeah... frame hangin' waaaay down below the body, and big gaps between the frame and bed in the wheel well.
In the meantime though, just going with a set of extended shackles offered a TREMENDOUS improvement over stock... and they were all of 25 bucks at the autoparts store.
So, while your setup is a valid option I'm simply offering readers here another one.
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,924
Likes: 203
From: Greenville, SC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0
It's not so much "settling" as it is "doing what needs to be done for now and saving in the meantime for what I really want" There are a couple of reasons: A) Money. Sole-provider of a household with wife and 3 kids doesn't afford much extra. I do what works, and trust me... my current setup works MUCH better than the stock shackles. Are there setups out there that work better? Sure. There's always a bigger fish. I.E. your setup will never flex as well as a custom triangulated 4-link.... so why not go with that? Answer... 'cause you're happy with your setup and it works, right? OH! And you probably don't have a couple G's to drop on that setup... I'm assuming. B) The amount of articulation in the rear of my Jeep is pretty well matched with the front. If I added the relo brackets, I'd have more in the back than in the front... and of that, I'm not a fan. C) I absolutely HATE the look of that setup. No offense to you man, absolutely none, so please don't take it that way. Eventually, I'm going to get shackle relo brackets, but they're going to be no-lift brackets. I hate the way the ones look that just bolt into the current location of the shackle buckets. To me, it looks about as good as body lift. Not mild body lift either... we're talkin' 4" of body lift on a mid-90's chevy k1500... yeah... frame hangin' waaaay down below the body, and big gaps between the frame and bed in the wheel well. In the meantime though, just going with a set of extended shackles offered a TREMENDOUS improvement over stock... and they were all of 25 bucks at the autoparts store. So, while your setup is a valid option I'm simply offering readers here another one.
No, I don't lick fish.



Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 11,169
Likes: 26
From: Northern Kentucky
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
well I'm very very offended. Just kidding I think it looks awful too. It would be awesome to have no lift relocation brackets, but at the time I was all about not doing anything I couldn't take off and go back to stock but now I'm at the point of screw it. My rear flexes way more than the front, but I can't afford to make the front flex more than it does now. Also the whole why settle thing was mostly a joke, there's a lot worse out there and I would know.
These are actually what I'm planning on going with once I finally do go that route. The bolt to the frame rail, through the floor, AND through the rear crossbrace. Just seems like a rock-solid setup to me. Check 'em out...
http://www.polyperformance.com/Syner...Hanger-Bracket
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 1
From: Detroit, MI
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L
lol... ah ok. My bad dude, I didn't catch the joking inflection in your tone.
These are actually what I'm planning on going with once I finally do go that route. The bolt to the frame rail, through the floor, AND through the rear crossbrace. Just seems like a rock-solid setup to me. Check 'em out...
http://www.polyperformance.com/Syner...Hanger-Bracket
These are actually what I'm planning on going with once I finally do go that route. The bolt to the frame rail, through the floor, AND through the rear crossbrace. Just seems like a rock-solid setup to me. Check 'em out...
http://www.polyperformance.com/Syner...Hanger-Bracket
Moderator of Jeeps
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 21,029
Likes: 3
From: Frederick, MD from Cleveland, OH
Year: 1993 YJ Wrangler
Engine: 4.0 I6




