Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4x4 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2012 | 05:54 PM
  #1  
Double_0_XJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default 4x4 question

hello every one

I have what I hope will be a simple question with a simple answer.

I have a 2000 xj 4dr with a 4.5" lift and i was just wondering if the front drive shaft should spin when the t car is in 2H
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2012 | 06:06 PM
  #2  
JeepingDan's Avatar
CF Veteran
Premium Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,786
Likes: 14
From: CT.
Year: 88
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

Yes it should.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2012 | 06:10 PM
  #3  
USMCgunrock's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 276
Likes: 7
From: NJ/NY
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
Default

Originally Posted by Double_0_XJ
hello every one

I have what I hope will be a simple question with a simple answer.

I have a 2000 xj 4dr with a 4.5" lift and i was just wondering if the front drive shaft should spin when the t car is in 2H
Welcome to the Forum!

Yes it does. That's y I took the front drive shaft off of my DD and only put it on when I know I will be using 4wd. One less mass for the drive train to move = a little bit of improvement on gas mileage.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2012 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
Hamster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: Rome, GA
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Yep, that's why the MPG of a stock/unmodified XJ sucks ***.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2012 | 07:24 PM
  #5  
TheJerm's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 4
From: Flint/Asheville
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

Originally Posted by Hamster
Yep, that's why the MPG of a stock/unmodified XJ sucks ***.
I disagree because Renault/AMC tried the whole vacuum disconnect axle as a way to improve mileage but didnt really work and way dropped for i'm sure cost reasons. Today no trucks or suv's come with lock out hubs and I'm gonna go out on a limb and say lock out hubs came about because it made engineering 4x4 back in the 60's easier to ride smoother at highways speeds.

And XJ's get pretty standard mileage for a SUV from the 80's/90's with reasonable power. Stock at ~200K miles mine was 20-24mpg, lifted on 33's is 17-20mpg (230K and hit 21.5 on one tank driving thru the mountains!!!!) unless I'm really romping on it but Ive never seen less than 15.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2012 | 08:17 PM
  #6  
xj9901's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: Lancaster, PA
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by TheJerm

I disagree because Renault/AMC tried the whole vacuum disconnect axle as a way to improve mileage but didnt really work and way dropped for i'm sure cost reasons. Today no trucks or suv's come with lock out hubs and I'm gonna go out on a limb and say lock out hubs came about because it made engineering 4x4 back in the 60's easier to ride smoother at highways speeds.

And XJ's get pretty standard mileage for a SUV from the 80's/90's with reasonable power. Stock at ~200K miles mine was 20-24mpg, lifted on 33's is 17-20mpg (230K and hit 21.5 on one tank driving thru the mountains!!!!) unless I'm really romping on it but Ive never seen less than 15.
It must be my motor but I have 31s and I do almost only in town driving back home and I'm lucky to get 13mpg haha
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 05:48 AM
  #7  
USMCgunrock's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 276
Likes: 7
From: NJ/NY
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
Default

Originally Posted by xj9901
It must be my motor but I have 31s and I do almost only in town driving back home and I'm lucky to get 13mpg haha
I have the same situation. City driving with 31's and stock gears I get around 12mpg but when I drove down to Florida and back with a fully loaded vehicle I was getting 22ish!

Anywho..i think this thread just got Name:  hijacked.gif
Views: 13
Size:  1.4 KB lol
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 06:19 AM
  #8  
kyledye25's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 517
Likes: 1
From: Apollo, PA
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Let's get back on track. Haha. So, yes the front drive shaft spins. And yes people remove it for better mpgs. Anything bad or can go wrong by removing it? I'm looking to get better mpgs. I'm only sitting at 2-2.5 inches of lift. With some 235's. Lucky to get 16 mpg around town. I average 13-15. Highway is better...usually 18-20. Better I'm sure if I tried. But that's 65-70 with some 75+ passing involved. But anyways....removing the front driveshaft is ok? No issues other then no 4 wheel drive? Like I said just looking to get a bit better mpgs. And please don't ram tune ups and stuff down my neck. It's all been done. Cooling system, ignition, almost everything is new. And most were replaced with mopar parts. Thanks.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 08:00 AM
  #9  
Double_0_XJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

thanks for all the info guys, i'm also getting around 14mpg and i'm running 33 12.50s with just an upgraded air filter. i'm looking to upgrade the cooling system, cause it runs steady at 217° with the AC on and gets a little sluggish.

Last edited by Double_0_XJ; Jun 15, 2012 at 09:36 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4doorXJ
Introductions
8
Sep 14, 2015 02:18 PM
Fred/N0AZZ
Cherokee Chat
1
Sep 14, 2015 08:19 AM
SpunksterXJ
Engines/Tranny/T-Case
0
Sep 13, 2015 09:31 AM
xjr10
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
7
Sep 12, 2015 04:16 PM
carson
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
1
Sep 2, 2015 08:26 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 AM.