which xj is bestt??? i need help!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 12, 2011 | 11:24 PM

#31

jeepguy93

Thread Starter

CF Veteran

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 2,550

Likes: 1

From: aurora colorado

Year: 1991

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

Still need opinions. The 94 is 3300 no long arms I found out and the 2000 is 3800 hard decision!

Jan 13, 2011 | 03:52 AM

#32

jcwclm

CF Veteran

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 2,844

Likes: 0

From: Warsaw, IN

Year: 2000,1990,1999

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeepguy93

Still need opinions. The 94 is 3300 no long arms I found out and the 2000 is 3800 hard decision!

In the end its all up to you man. I really like the 2000 though, haha.

Jan 13, 2011 | 09:57 AM

#33

nismo5

Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 553

Likes: 1

From: chico,ca

Year: 1989

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

i would def go for the 2000 IMO the 6" long arm lift will perform better and ride better and is plenty high enough for the 33's and i like the newer look

Jan 13, 2011 | 10:19 AM

#34

MVDCXJ

Seasoned Member

Joined: Nov 2009

Posts: 308

Likes: 0

From: Beltsville, MD

Year: 2000

Model: Cherokee

Engine: I6

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeepguy93

Still need opinions. The 94 is 3300 no long arms I found out and the 2000 is 3800 hard decision!

Ok I dont know why this is even a question anymore. Lets see; lower mileage, newer body and everything else, better lift kit, $400 more. . . . . . seems like a no brainer.

Since you didnt know the '94 had a short arm lift I assume you havent test driven either vehicle. Why not go test drive them both and see which you like better. Who knows maybe the 2000 knocks and shakes like crazy or the other way around