Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

WK vs XJ

Old Dec 26, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #1  
DMcPher316's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: East central Illinois
Model: Cherokee
Default WK vs XJ

having no experience with jeeps of any kind, I have a question. I like the looks of a lifted XJ but there is something to be said for a lifted WJ to. In the opinion of the forum, what are the advantages of each, what year of each is best to lift? I know the XJ has leaf springs in the rear and the WJ has coils, which is better?
I want on or the other, and it will see off road use, but about 70% of the time it will be on road or winter driving. I like the 6" lift with the 33" tires, so I will go with that on both whatever "J"s
Comments welcome from all as I said, I've never owned a Jeep of any kind. Thanks, David
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 04:02 PM
  #2  
AoA's Avatar
AoA
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Brookfield, WI
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.2L bored out 4.0L I6
Default

WK = garbage, good for soccer moms
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 04:18 PM
  #3  
sj2000xj's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: South jersey
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Xj cheaper to build , easier to find parts. Wj if want leather seats and hello kitty sticker..
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 04:49 PM
  #4  
Lifted98's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Wny
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Straight 6
Default

only thing i like about the wj is the springs on all 4 corners but im 100% xj on this thread like the guy above said the grands are for moms and grammas IMHO
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 04:53 PM
  #5  
xjsnake's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Year: 1997, 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Your title and question don't match.

WK= 2005-2010 Grand Cherokee
WJ= 1999-2004 Grand Cherokee

Either way I'm an XJ person.

Last edited by xjsnake; Dec 26, 2011 at 06:57 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 05:18 PM
  #6  
Nemesissparadise's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
From: North Pole Alaska
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4 liter
Default

Originally Posted by xjsnake
Your title and question don't match.

WK= 2005-2010 Grand Cherokee
WJ= 199-2004 Grand Cherokee

Either way I'm an XJ person.
and you also failed at posting... in the year 199 they were no Grand Cherokees made
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 06:19 PM
  #7  
xjsnake's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Year: 1997, 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by Nemesissparadise
and you also failed at posting... in the year 199 they were no Grand Cherokees made

Haha, there might have been. I can envision a wagon called a cherokee going across the plains way back when...

Last edited by xjsnake; Dec 26, 2011 at 06:57 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 06:25 PM
  #8  
rideordie66's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 850
Likes: 4
From: Arcata California
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

For offroad use the xj is far better. In my opinion that is.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 07:40 PM
  #9  
digger21's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: parker, co
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

I have both and there's a reason I don't wheel my WJ and put all my money into the xj. The WJ is my smooth ride.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 03:17 AM
  #10  
99 Purple XJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,889
Likes: 2
From: Long Island N.Y.
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0
Default

Xj for off roading a wj for comfort but for me a wj would have to be a limited
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 05:14 AM
  #11  
jcwclm's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 0
From: Warsaw, IN
Year: 2000,1990,1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Wj's can be awesome offroad. Just costs a little more than the xj usually. The ride comfort is better than the xj. If you're not going hardcore, go with a wj.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 05:11 PM
  #12  
DMcPher316's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: East central Illinois
Model: Cherokee
Default WJ vs XJ

Thanks to all for posting and to the few commodians for their comments too. I figured I'd go with the XJ, I like the squared off look without so much plastic. Only reason I asked was the coils on the WJ. And in the year 199, it would have been a Cherokee wagon with 8 hoof power and not much of a suspension. Away, thanks for the help.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 08:09 AM
  #13  
Bustedknuckle's Avatar
Old Skewl CF like a Sir
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,355
Likes: 3
From: Fort Myers, FL
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L High Output OBDII
Default

WJ > XJ all day everyday. I say it all the time. Everything the XJ has, plus more, better suspension, still get yout 4.0, and leather.

WK - Meh.

WK2 - Starting to impress me.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 08:51 AM
  #14  
xjtrailrider's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke VA
Model: Cherokee
Default

The problem with the ZJ/WJ Grands is reliability! The trannys and rear axles are junk, the rest of those Jeeps are okay with the exception of some electrical/HVAC issues.

I love the XJ for the 4.0/AW4 combo and the simplicity of the rest of the Jeep. If you happen to have a XJ with the D-Turdyfive rear axle then that is a problem that is easily fixed with a Ford 8.8, Dana 44 or a 29 spline 8.25 depending on your budget.

A plus side for the ZJ/WJ is that Jeep kept the solid front axle in them.

I ventured out of my comfort zone of the XJ two years ago and bought a brand new 09 HEMI Commander (XK). I love it! Its been rock solid dependable. I WISH it had a solid front axle but that is the only thing I would change.

Last edited by xjtrailrider; Dec 28, 2011 at 08:56 AM.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 PM.