Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Why are Wranglers so hot?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2010 | 09:46 PM
  #31  
Irongrave's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 9
From: Florence SC
Year: 1996
Engine: 4.0
Default

I like wranglers, at the end of the day you can only take an XJ so far. beyond 35in tires your start running into limits of a unibody rig. I love mine but when I get to the point where i want a buggy its going to be either a pile of tubes or start with a wrangler frame. Also after wheeling with a new 4 door JK rubi with only a BB and 35 KM2s and watching it eat up trails that the long arm TJs in the group were having issues with total changed my opinion on them. they are BA rigs with only a few minor mods.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2010 | 11:27 AM
  #32  
Diesel's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 4
From: Wantage, NJ
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Originally Posted by Tankerblade
That why we wait about 10 years so theyre only a couple grand. and parts are super cheap

diesel. why is the hemi swap a waste of time? their little minivan engine is like the 2.7 v-6 that cherokees had (or whatever it is). swap that 2.7 into your jeep and then report back how you like it
But why a hemi. Also what size the 426?

Hemis are a waste of money, for half the price I could get a better performing and more reliable engine.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2010 | 11:53 AM
  #33  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

Originally Posted by dave1123
I live in a fashionable east-side suburb of Syracuse NY. There are enough doctors, lawyers, CEOs, and accountants in this town to make you gag! I live in a 100 year old farmhouse outside the village so you know where I stand.
I was talking to my local Jeep dealer the other day, and he tells me he sells more Wranglers than any other model! Why? I'm almost certain these will never go off-road! He says 'cause they're cheap, rugged, and cool! Can you stand it??? There is also a Mercedes dealership just down the street. I quess they are just Hummer types that want to be enviro correct! GAG!!!
I don't know if you've realized this, but there are just as many STOCK Cherokees as there are Wranglers. I'm willing to bet that there are more stock Cherokees than Wranglers as there were many more XJs produced than Wranglers IIRC.

I see at least half a dozen factory Cherokees every day that have never seen a gravel road, let alone off-road situations.

Originally Posted by Tural
to each their own. i don't hate wranglers, i just don't want one. they do look unique compared to a regular suv. I guess people think that wranglers look more trail-ready. whether they are, or not is for them to find out.
I can stuff 31x10.5s under my fiance's 98 TJ that is bone stock, nothing trimmed or modded whatsoever. Trail ready? I'd say so.

Originally Posted by Bustedknuckle
See them all over down here. It's good, even if they buy a 2wd 4 door with no intention of taking off pavement. Keeps our brand strong and relevant, and years down the line when you can pickup a JK for a few hundred bucks, they'll be loads of them for parts & projects. Everything comes full circle.
Weren't 2wd Cherokees produced before JK 2wd? Sure, mail trucks were only 2wd, but IIRC plenty of Cherokees are 2wd as well.

Originally Posted by BLACKSPORT
Yep i always got "i thought you were getting a "jeep jeep"". They look good and i would love one but they are way over priced and i see too many yuppies ill call them just buy them lift them on 35s chrome 20s and good to go. WHY? You know they will never see dirt even if its washed onto the pavement haha. It just drives me nuts. I mean i guess im jealous that I cant buy the new 4dr and do everything they can and actually use it but still it bugs me even if i know its only because im jealous haha. End rant.
Go ahead and see what you can stuff under your factory XJ or ZJ, though. I see plenty of "yuppies" in plenty of other cars. I guess yuppies don't have a serious vehicle preference, cuz I see them in lots of other cars/trucks/SUVs.

Originally Posted by OttawaXJ
Say what you wish about the new wranglers but they are capable. I wheeled with a guy who had a completely stock unlimited(09 i think) and that thing went places my Jeep couldnt dream of going yet. Ofcourse my XJ was stock but he was keeping up with another guy in an XJ that was on 33s.

I personally dont like wranglers all that much(they make very poor apocalypse vehicles. Zombies can climb right in. lol) but I dont doubt their capability to wipe the floor with a stock XJ right out of the box. They make great offroaders and they are actually pretty decent daily drivers.

My only complaint in the wrangler is the whimpy V6 engine. Jeep should have left the minivan engine in the minivans(patriot, commander, liberty, etc) and left the 4L in or went straight for the Hemi.
They are indeed. The Rubis come with front and rear elockers. And if you remove the fenders you can run some serious tire without lift. And that is just the "new" generation.

I've got a TJ and its beautiful. Coils all around, can fit 31s stock, and I can take off the top. In the event of a zombocalypse, I can toss the hard top right back on, no zombie issues.

And that V6 isn't much better than the I6. Its been around almost as long, and has proven itself. Not that its the best, I love the 4.0, but its not the worst choice (cough cough 2.8).

Originally Posted by Rock Toy
The JKs should have had a V8 option. You have trouble driving the 4dr with 4 people on the highway and maintaining speed, can just imagine trying to pull anything with them.
Even the 4.0 liter V6 would have been better.
A V8 would be sex.

Originally Posted by JeepingDan
In my town when the college is open the Wranglers are every wear you look from teachers to students and every single one is bone stock.
Gotta say they are hot selling vehicles and I do think they are pretty cool looking.
But it's not my taste because of they limited cargo room and bouncy ride.
The TJs aren't a bad ride, not choppy at all. And I am in an area with bad roads.

I see more modded/lifted Wranglers in my area than Cherokees. I guess area dictates what is more popular?

Originally Posted by Svrider
exactly to each his own. I used to think wranglers were sweet until i realized what would be practical! something that can tow a heavy load. something with more room for storing stuff, something that can fit a family in.

Something that doesnt look like barbie drives every day!

i dont hate wranglers i still think they are cool the classic wrangler look, but i just dont like the look of the new 4dr wranglers.
Cherokees aren't that great for towing, and I can stuff plenty of groceries in my fiance's TJ. We don't have a family yet, but if you've got a family, chances are you've got more than one car.

I've never seen "barbie" in a Wrangler. At least not while I was driving.

Originally Posted by dave1123
I just discovered something. Wranglers are available with an automatic trans! That explains a lot! DOH!! I'm still glad I bought my ZJ. That 4.0L AMC inline 6 is/was the most reliable engine jeep ever used. Long stroke = lots of torque.

Did you know Pres. Eisenhower started building the Interstate road system because He was impressed how quickly the ***** could move military equiptment on the Autobahn? Imagine that! Something else with a German origin! If I remember correctly Mercedes built a combat car with tracks!
You can get XJs, ZJs, YJs, and TJs all with the 4.0 and an automatic trans. Not sure what your point was there.

Originally Posted by N20jeep
The hemi swap makes more power than most jk's will ever need.
So why use such an expensive powerplant when you could get the same and more power out of a motor for less than half the cost?

Originally Posted by N20jeep
And as for the new jk's they are hands down the most capable production jeeps built. They offer far more interior space than previous wranglers, along with a much smoother and stable ride. Not to mention the comfort level is high for jeep.

Yes the jeep feels underpowered, but that is not the fault of the v6. It is because of frame weight, along with all the crash safety enforcements the jk has. The 4.0 would have not made a difference in this jeep. As long as you keep the gearing correct, then its really not that bad with bigger tires and lift. Besides, if you really need more power there's always a supercharger or a hemi swap

And, yes a lot of jk owners are first time jeep owners. And that's a good thing. Many are donating to charities like the blue ribbon coalition and that helps keep trails open and this hobby alive. And its people like that who help dismiss the stereotype that offroaders are just a bunch of careless rednecks
They are indeed.

In the end, to each his own.

That why I have both.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2010 | 02:04 PM
  #34  
Rock Toy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 3
From: Cove, OR
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Good post! I agree with most of your conclusions, a V8 option, or the V6 4 liter that was in the Chrysler Caliber ( spelling? ) would have made the JK great.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #35  
Tankerblade's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 3
From: Gilbert, AZ
Year: 2001
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel
But why a hemi. Also what size the 426?

Hemis are a waste of money, for half the price I could get a better performing and more reliable engine.
Why not a hemi? its personal preference. I prefer to keep things brand oriented. Sounds gay i know, but it keeps things cleaner in my opinion. A jeep with a ford engine isnt really a jeep IMHO.

If i was to build one, itd have a Cummings diesel in it.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #36  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

Originally Posted by Tankerblade
Why not a hemi? its personal preference. I prefer to keep things brand oriented. Sounds gay i know, but it keeps things cleaner in my opinion. A jeep with a ford engine isnt really a jeep IMHO.

If i was to build one, itd have a Cummings diesel in it.
If you wanted to keep brand oriented you'd realize the Hemi isn't even a "Jeep" motor.

The Jeep name has traded hands more times than a cheap hooker. [kidding]

But seriously, its been all over. The real "brand oriented" powerplant would be something different than a "Hemi," thats for sure.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 09:17 AM
  #37  
Diesel's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 4
From: Wantage, NJ
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Originally Posted by Tankerblade
Why not a hemi? its personal preference. I prefer to keep things brand oriented. Sounds gay i know, but it keeps things cleaner in my opinion. A jeep with a ford engine isnt really a jeep IMHO.

If i was to build one, itd have a Cummings diesel in it.
Cummins. And no lol

Originally Posted by Gee oh Dee
If you wanted to keep brand oriented you'd realize the Hemi isn't even a "Jeep" motor.

The Jeep name has traded hands more times than a cheap hooker. [kidding]

But seriously, its been all over. The real "brand oriented" powerplant would be something different than a "Hemi," thats for sure.
Thank you, you said it much nicer than I would have.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #38  
dave1123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old fart with a wrench
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,398
Likes: 741
From: Manlius, east of Syracuse, NY
Year: 2000 XJ Sport & WJ Laredo
Model: Grand Cherokee (WJ)
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Gentlemen, I just heard a rumor that all 2012's will be required to have traction control! Please, God, still my soul! Why does the NTSB have to stick their nose where it doesn't belong? ABS brakes, Air bags, Collision bumpers, traction control, what next, 5 point belts? Maybe a robot to drive it! Maybe I should buy 5 old vehicles and keep one driving!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 12:28 PM
  #39  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

Originally Posted by dave1123
Gentlemen, I just heard a rumor that all 2012's will be required to have traction control! Please, God, still my soul! Why does the NTSB have to stick their nose where it doesn't belong? ABS brakes, Air bags, Collision bumpers, traction control, what next, 5 point belts? Maybe a robot to drive it! Maybe I should buy 5 old vehicles and keep one driving!
There will always be a way around it, but money will be the key.

I'd like to have a 5 point belt system in my ride.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #40  
Tankerblade's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 3
From: Gilbert, AZ
Year: 2001
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Gee oh Dee
If you wanted to keep brand oriented you'd realize the Hemi isn't even a "Jeep" motor.

The Jeep name has traded hands more times than a cheap hooker. [kidding]

But seriously, its been all over. The real "brand oriented" powerplant would be something different than a "Hemi," thats for sure.
Im not a ford guy or a chevy. so that being said hemi, whether it be chrysler, dodge, hooker whatever you want to fin call it, so be it. I refuse to ever stick a chevy or ford under any hood of mine. yes it may be cheaper, but i'll be paying for it later in other costs.

Originally Posted by Diesel
Cummins. And no lol

Thank you, you said it much nicer than I would have.
Thank you my 5th grade analytical grammar correct English teacher.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #41  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

Originally Posted by Tankerblade
Im not a ford guy or a chevy. so that being said hemi, whether it be chrysler, dodge, hooker whatever you want to fin call it, so be it. I refuse to ever stick a chevy or ford under any hood of mine. yes it may be cheaper, but i'll be paying for it later in other costs.


You got a genuine laugh out of me from that one!

I try to stay away from being brand specific. I find several cars from several different mfgs attractive to limit myself to one brand.

And to be honest I really didn't have Ford or Chevy in mind. AMC made a 360 V8, which is really what I was thinking.

But then again, AMC wasn't the original owner, either. Wasn't it ******?
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 04:29 PM
  #42  
Tankerblade's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 3
From: Gilbert, AZ
Year: 2001
Engine: 4.0
Default

Im only being brand specific because of my experience. our hemi in our dodge ram has been unbelievably good to us. no major issues. biggest repair we've ever had to do (to the engine) is the radiator. At 126k its still kicking strong. The truck is literally falling apart around it from the abuse.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 04:45 PM
  #43  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

Originally Posted by Tankerblade
Im only being brand specific because of my experience. our hemi in our dodge ram has been unbelievably good to us. no major issues. biggest repair we've ever had to do (to the engine) is the radiator. At 126k its still kicking strong. The truck is literally falling apart around it from the abuse.


lolol

Sounds like my 1992 F150 with the 4.9L I6....only I've got an extra 125K on her.

Sometimes you find good vehicles that just don't die.

More things have rusted off that truck than were ever "maintained" or "fixed." Yet I know that if I need to, I can go outside, day or night, rain or snow, hell or high water, drop in a charged battery, and fire her right up.

Hell, if there isn't a battery, she'll get push started!!!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 06:22 PM
  #44  
jeff2285's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by no rdplz
I'm not a huge Wrangler fan, but I don't hate them. If I were to ever get one though, it'd be a TJ with the 4.0. The JK's are nice and all, whether it be 2 or 4 door, but I'm not a fan of the V-6.
the 3.8L v6 makes more power than the 4.0
and its wayy better on gas
the 4.0 is gone because it was horrible on fuel and it couldnt meet emissions the new 3.8 is fine and if you ever test drive one you wont be upset

Last edited by jeff2285; Nov 24, 2010 at 06:25 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #45  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

Originally Posted by Rock Toy
The JKs should have had a V8 option. You have trouble driving the 4dr with 4 people on the highway and maintaining speed, can just imagine trying to pull anything with them.
Even the 4.0 liter V6 would have been better.
Originally Posted by jeff2285
the 3.8L v6 makes more power than the 4.0
and its wayy better on gas
the 4.0 is gone because it was horrible on fuel and it couldnt meet emissions the new 3.8 is fine and if you ever test drive one you wont be upset
Some members have.

Some even own one at the moment.

And I know from personal experience the 4.0 isn't the most powerful motor out there. Loading up a 4 door Wrangler with people, gear, and larger tires will leave anyone wanting more power from either motor.

Bottom line, a V8 should have been offered.

Then we could steal them from for cheap from yuppies who don't know how to drive and stuff them in XJs.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 PM.