Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Thinking of buying a 1997 Cherokee

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 07:05 PM
  #1  
Crybicki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default Thinking of buying a 1997 Cherokee

Hey everybody! I used to have a 1998 Grand Cherokee a couple years ago with the 5.9 V8 and I sold it to get a Lexus. I love my Lexus, but, I want another SUV. A close friend of mine is selling her 1997 Cherokee. It's 4 door, 2WD. Shes looking for 1400 OBO. Its got around 175,XXX miles on it. I am going to look at it tomorrow afternoon. She says it drives fine, just needs some minor tweaking and maintenance done. I am posting because I wanted to know your thought on it. What do you guys think of the price? I have looked around to compare but there really aren't that many Cherokees for sale here in Orlando. Also, can you give me some heads up on what to look for on it? I can handle minor fixes and maintenance myself, I am mechanically inclined.
Thanks in advanced!

-Chris
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 07:36 PM
  #2  
Dire_Wolf's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0litre
Default

Don't buy it, it's 2WD. Doesn't deserve the Cherokee or Jeep name.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 07:46 PM
  #3  
Bluemister2's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: rock hill, sc
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Dire_Wolf
Don't buy it, it's 2WD. Doesn't deserve the Cherokee or Jeep name.

+1
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 09:14 PM
  #4  
Bob98Classic's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 200
Likes: 2
Model: Cherokee
Default

Buy it, it is 2wd, what would you need 4x4 for in Orlando.

I have a 98 2wd, drives great, better than my 97 4x4 XJ....
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 11:13 PM
  #5  
SoCalxJ4.0's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 5
From: Pahrump, NV
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by Bob98Classic
Buy it, it is 2wd, what would you need 4x4 for in Orlando.

I have a 98 2wd, drives great, better than my 97 4x4 XJ....
Lies! Nothing drives better than a 4x4!!!
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 11:15 PM
  #6  
Zack92MJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
Year: 1992
Model: Comanche
Engine: 4.0
Default

1997 and 2wd PASS. Ovoid the 97s like a plague.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 11:37 PM
  #7  
SoCalxJ4.0's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 5
From: Pahrump, NV
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by Zacks98
1997 and 2wd PASS. Ovoid the 97s like a plague.
Huh?

Edit:

Nevermind, reread, I understand.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 11:43 PM
  #8  
Demonoid369's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: salem, OR
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by Zacks98
1997 and 2wd PASS. Ovoid the 97s like a plague.
There is nothing wrong with a 97' don't be ignorant.
97' get a bad rep because as the new year/model came out. Jeep figured that people would buy them equipped with everything, so each jeep came with a full package wiring harness. That's why you can find SE(like mine) with connectors leading no where. Nothing wrong with that. Heck I think the 97' is a actually good year if you can find a early 97' one(jan-may) because you can get the late model looks and style but get the early model hinges(like mine) and right there your up one on the late model owners. I love my 97' it hasn't gave me anymore trouble than any other year jeep
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2013 | 01:37 AM
  #9  
andrewmp6's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 17
From: Louisville,KY
Model: Cherokee
Default

If its clean inside and out and drives fine buy it.2wd is a down side to most of us but if you just want a daily driver it will be fine where you live no snow lol.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2013 | 09:54 AM
  #10  
Zack92MJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio
Year: 1992
Model: Comanche
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Demonoid369

There is nothing wrong with a 97' don't be ignorant.
97' get a bad rep because as the new year/model came out. Jeep figured that people would buy them equipped with everything, so each jeep came with a full package wiring harness. That's why you can find SE(like mine) with connectors leading no where. Nothing wrong with that. Heck I think the 97' is a actually good year if you can find a early 97' one(jan-may) because you can get the late model looks and style but get the early model hinges(like mine) and right there your up one on the late model owners. I love my 97' it hasn't gave me anymore trouble than any other year jeep
No, that's how all of the newer wiring harnesses are. Jeep used up all of their extra parts in the 97s not just the hinges IMO I wouldn't want it. He could easy find a 4x4 model. That's the main reason to pass on it then add the fact that it's the bastard year and I would just pass in it completely. But the main this is that it's not a 4x4 model I mean he's going to spend close to 1000 all said and done to covert it to 4x4.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2013 | 11:00 AM
  #11  
Crybicki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Haha thanks for all the great replies guys. Heads up--I don't need 4x4. I just need an SUV. I'm in Orlando so it's a concrete forest here. Plus, if its 4x4 ill be paying more on insurance. I can live without it. It's just going to be a weekly driver. I'm mostly concerned with how the 97s hold up endurance-wise. I'm probably going to offer her 1100 or 1200 so I don't think I am going to find that much better of a deal.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2013 | 12:47 PM
  #12  
dave1123's Avatar
Old fart with a wrench
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,398
Likes: 741
From: Manlius, east of Syracuse, NY
Year: 2000 XJ Sport & WJ Laredo
Model: Grand Cherokee (WJ)
Engine: 4.0L
Default

The only places you might need 4WD is deep sand or mud. Just stay off the beaches and out of the swamps. Or in Orlando, maybe sinkholes.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2013 | 04:00 PM
  #13  
dmill89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 918
Likes: 6
From: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by Crybicki
I'm mostly concerned with how the 97s hold up endurance-wise.

97s are fine durability/reliability wise, but as others have said since it was a "transition year" finding replacement parts is a little more difficult (not that the parts themselves are hard to find but it can be difficult to get the right part for a particular vehicle unless you take the "old" part off and compare it to the "new" one). There are going to be some "older style" (91-96) parts and some "newer style" (98-01) parts, with an inconsistent mix that varies vehicle to vehicle (early 97s have more "old style" parts, late 97s have more "new style" parts but all will have some kind of mix.

Last edited by dmill89; Sep 7, 2013 at 09:54 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2013 | 05:39 PM
  #14  
dnuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 960
Likes: 3
From: Ahwatukee, Phoenix, AZ
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

if its in decent shape, i say go for it.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2013 | 10:16 PM
  #15  
andrewmp6's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 17
From: Louisville,KY
Model: Cherokee
Default

If its the 4.0 inline 6 that engine is one of the best jeep ones made,If its a auto or a stick both are good trans.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.