Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

New 2014 Cherokee

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2013 | 01:01 PM
  #16  
XJPat's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Year: 91
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6 H.O.
Default

^^^ That's a good point, I bought mine because it was like half the price of a wrangler. Not sure I would have paid new car prices and bought mine new in 91.
Old Nov 12, 2013 | 03:01 PM
  #17  
jmm0122_'s Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 368
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I drove one the other day and it's not all that bad. I wouldn't own one but overall it seems like a good little suv. 99% of the people that are gonna buy them will drive them on the streets. Jeep is not trying to appeal to the offroaders out there they are trying to appeal to people that want a comfortable ride on road with something that is 4wd if its needed. I don't get why people are giving it so much crap. It's not like giving it the Cherokee name badge is going to effect the XJ in any way.

Last edited by jmm0122_; Nov 12, 2013 at 03:37 PM.
Old Nov 12, 2013 | 03:10 PM
  #18  
SHELBYGT NSM's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 358
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

The front end is what throws it off so bad, especially the lights,
Old Nov 12, 2013 | 05:20 PM
  #19  
dmill89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 918
Likes: 6
From: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by SHELBYGT NSM
The front end is what throws it off so bad, especially the lights,
That and the price, even if you want a cross-over/DD SUV the KL "Cherokee" likely isn't the best option given its price point.

4-cyl KLs cost significantly more than many competitors, especially the Subaru Forester which offers more passenger space, more cargo space, more ground clearance (8.7"), better MPG, and better acceleration (compared to the 4-cyl KL), and is several thousand less than a 4WD/AWD equipped KL (AWD is standard on the Subaru).

On the other end a 6-cyl 4WD/AWD KL isn't that much cheaper (~$3-5k depending on options when similarly equipped) than a WK2 Grand Cherokee which offers more passenger space, more cargo space, a higher towing rating, more ground clearance (except the KL Trail Hawk), better off-road capability, a nicer interior, a smoother ride(at least according to the reviews), a better drivetrain, etc.

If the KL was $4-5k cheaper it would at least be competitive in it's segment but I simply can't see a good reason to buy one over competitors at it's current price point even if you are looking for that type of vehicle.

Last edited by dmill89; Nov 12, 2013 at 05:23 PM.
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 01:11 AM
  #20  
Cnwxj's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by muffinman
And, what did you think? I get a huge kick out of the XJ faithful saying the same crap about the KL and the Old Liberty KJ that was said about the XJ when it came out. I test drove new Xjs in 84 and 85 and they were ****. Nobody around here much cared for them until they became really cheap,lol
i just don't see the potential in it. I do see some in the liberty...some.
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 01:19 AM
  #21  
Cnwxj's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

New 2014 Cherokee-image-848920112.jpg



New 2014 Cherokee-image-1169732852.jpg

It is a cherocar! Just another jacked up econo cruiser without the econo price.
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 01:58 AM
  #22  
XJmike0122's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 1
From: Eaton Co
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Cnwxj
i just don't see the potential in it. I do see some in the liberty...some.
For an on road SUV I would take a newer Liberty over the new Cherokee any day. At least it looks some what like a Jeep. I'm not a fan of roundish SUVs
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 04:54 AM
  #23  
Morat's Avatar
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 74
From: North Riding of Yorkshire, UK
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by dmill89
That and the price, even if you want a cross-over/DD SUV the KL "Cherokee" likely isn't the best option given its price point.

4-cyl KLs cost significantly more than many competitors, especially the Subaru Forester which offers more passenger space, more cargo space, more ground clearance (8.7"), better MPG, and better acceleration (compared to the 4-cyl KL), and is several thousand less than a 4WD/AWD equipped KL (AWD is standard on the Subaru).

On the other end a 6-cyl 4WD/AWD KL isn't that much cheaper (~$3-5k depending on options when similarly equipped) than a WK2 Grand Cherokee which offers more passenger space, more cargo space, a higher towing rating, more ground clearance (except the KL Trail Hawk), better off-road capability, a nicer interior, a smoother ride(at least according to the reviews), a better drivetrain, etc.

If the KL was $4-5k cheaper it would at least be competitive in it's segment but I simply can't see a good reason to buy one over competitors at it's current price point even if you are looking for that type of vehicle.
A friend of mine has the turbocharged Forester - that thing can shift! It has a much nicer interior that I remember on the older models too, although zip off washable seat covers were pretty cool in their way
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 05:40 AM
  #24  
cruiser54's Avatar
::CF Moderator::
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,578
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Have you guys watched the promotional videos featuring the Trailhawk?
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 05:57 PM
  #25  
SHELBYGT NSM's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 358
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

It comes with a 9 speed automatic trans, No thank you.
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 07:44 PM
  #26  
jeepheep1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: FL
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L H.O Power Tech
Default

The 4cyl Tigershark... Come on guys that's cool hahahah
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 08:13 PM
  #27  
dmill89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 918
Likes: 6
From: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by jeepheep1
The 4cyl Tigershark... Come on guys that's cool hahahah
Nothing like a 4-cyl with absolutely no low-end torque in a 4,000lb+ vehicle for fun . Do we measure the 0-60 in months or years?
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 08:18 PM
  #28  
SHELBYGT NSM's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 358
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

But that MPG though.
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 08:19 PM
  #29  
95Cherokee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 3
From: Houston Tx.
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Why does it have to have 56,000 speeds........well OK 9, , what's all that good for, another 1 MPG? Wonder how much it will cost to replace a 9 speed tranny if it fails out of warranty?
Old Nov 13, 2013 | 08:25 PM
  #30  
SHELBYGT NSM's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 358
Likes: 1
From: Kentucky
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

If i had to guess i would say around $3500 to $7500. I just see alot of trouble with a 9 speed trans. does chrysler have anything else with a 9 speed trans? Or is this their first one?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.