BFG All Terrains Vs. BFG Mud Terrains

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 6, 2014 | 07:26 PM

#16

Aljay

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2012

Posts: 999

Likes: 0

From: Tx

Year: 2001

Model: Cherokee

Engine: I-6

My Ats break loose to easy on wet surfaces not trying to spin them . My rig is my daily for now. Got my 31x10.50s for free so I'lljust pay attention to my driving alittle more on the slick stuff.

Feb 6, 2014 | 08:38 PM

#17

BlakeAnnexstad

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 193

Likes: 0

From: Alpharetta, Ga

Year: 2001

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 6 Cylinder 4.0

Thank all yall for the input. I went with the ATs. I ordered them before the duratracs were introduced to the topic

Feb 7, 2014 | 09:22 AM

#18

JeepMN

Seasoned Member

Joined: Aug 2013

Posts: 452

Likes: 3

From: Duluth, MN

Year: 1999

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0 I6

I'm running the AT's right now and hate them.

Getting KM2's with my tax returns.

Feb 7, 2014 | 09:36 AM

#19

Lowrange2

Junior Member

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 15,016

Likes: 11

From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"

Year: 1993

Engine: 4.0

Another vote for Duratracs.

Really liking mine so far.

Feb 7, 2014 | 10:32 AM

#20

ZINGGG

CF Veteran

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 4,440

Likes: 3

From: Seal Beach, CA

Year: 1996

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0 HO Straight Six

You'll be happy with all terrains. I've had KM2s and didnt like them for my DD that is on road far more often than off. Although Duratracs woulda been a better choice

Feb 7, 2014 | 10:42 AM

#21

BlakeAnnexstad

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 193

Likes: 0

From: Alpharetta, Ga

Year: 2001

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 6 Cylinder 4.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZINGGG

You'll be happy with all terrains. I've had KM2s and didnt like them for my DD that is on road far more often than off. Although Duratracs woulda been a better choice

Im a bfg guy. Thanks though.

Feb 7, 2014 | 10:59 AM

#22

95Cherokee

CF Veteran

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 2,203

Likes: 3

From: Houston Tx.

Year: 1995

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

Duratracs vs. BFG MT's

Name: Duratracs008.jpg
Views: 1521
Size: 81.8 KB

Duratracs have squiggly lines cut in them, you can't go wrong with squiggly lines.

Last edited by 95Cherokee; Feb 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM.

Feb 7, 2014 | 11:18 AM

#23

tmac

Member

Joined: Jul 2012

Posts: 167

Likes: 0

From: The corner of Grey St.

Year: 1996

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0L

Quote:

Originally Posted by 95Cherokee

Duratracs vs. BFG MT's

Duratracs have squiggly lines cut in them, you can't go wrong with squiggly lines.

I think it should be noted that these are KM1s, not KM2s.

Feb 7, 2014 | 11:31 AM

#24

BlakeAnnexstad

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 193

Likes: 0

From: Alpharetta, Ga

Year: 2001

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 6 Cylinder 4.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmac

I think it should be noted that these are KM1s, not KM2s.

I think it should be noted this is ATs vs MTs, not Duratracs

Feb 7, 2014 | 11:35 AM

#25

tssguy123

CF Veteran

Joined: Oct 2012

Posts: 2,314

Likes: 3

From: Canton, GA

Year: 1996

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlakeAnnexstad

I think it should be noted this is ATs vs MTs, not Duratracs

Duratracs are Ats though. Technically.

Edit: just read the thread title. oops. Why are you so pro-BFG? Isn't this your first car? Legit question, not hating. :P

Feb 7, 2014 | 11:45 AM

#26

BlakeAnnexstad

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 193

Likes: 0

From: Alpharetta, Ga

Year: 2001

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 6 Cylinder 4.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by tssguy123

Duratracs are Ats though. Technically. Edit: just read the thread title. oops. Why are you so pro-BFG? Isn't this your first car? Legit question, not hating. :P

They look clean to me, i think they look kinda vintage and I like that

Feb 7, 2014 | 11:50 AM

#27

tssguy123

CF Veteran

Joined: Oct 2012

Posts: 2,314

Likes: 3

From: Canton, GA

Year: 1996

Model: Cherokee

Engine: 4.0

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlakeAnnexstad

They look clean to me, i think they look kinda vintage and I like that

Ahh okay.

Feb 8, 2014 | 12:43 AM

#28

mrfajita

CF Veteran

Joined: May 2010

Posts: 3,405

Likes: 2

From: Fort Collins, CO

Year: 1996

Engine: 4.0L HO

If the Duratracs came with a MT/R-K sidewall I'd never run anything other than them. Seen too many of them and heard too many stories of the sidewalls failing when wheeling. I've never run them though.