Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

2014 cherokee goes off roading

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 09:23 PM
  #181  
Cherokeekid4x4's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,652
Likes: 2
From: Kansas
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 190-hp, 4.0-liter I-6
Default

Originally Posted by emptypockets
I thought I'd add something of interest to those saying the new cherokee is aimed towards a younger audience. My sister-in-laws niece, who is 19, mentioned she wanted a Jeep. She asked her what new one she wanted to get and her reply was that she wanted a REAL Jeep, not the junk they sell now. I think I like this girl.
Doesn't change My mind about them. Honestly you have to drive one. A "real jeep" to a girl is a wrangler. (In my experience) there are rare Cherokees with women owning one. ( compared to chicks with wranglers) and I didn't know they were making vehicles based off how old people were? I think it's more along the line off technology and the ever changing auto market place.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 09:42 PM
  #182  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

I actually hadn't notice you edited your comment, so now that I've seen it I might as well respond.

Originally Posted by beatricethexj
I understand you feel betrayed and I agree, we all should feel that way. This is no contemporay XJ. Imagine how full size Cherokee owners felt when their ladder frame full size was replaced by a coil sprung, unibody, compact stationwagon. Never talked to someone who had that experience, but I would think they felt betrayed. From Jeep's perspective they are "revolutionizing" the midsize market again (4L, locker, 9 speed). With that perspective, "Cherokee" is the perfect name. I fully realize that this Jeep will never be some extreme offroader, but the market Jeep is gearing this towards will use it fine and have no need for anything more. The people who need something more, won't buy it. An XJ type Cherokee in Jeep's current lineup is too similar to the 4dr Wrangler to justify. Who knows what advancements in technology will allow innovative people, like yourself, to modify a independent suspension vehicle like this. We don't see now because we don't know what we don't know. My grandmother never thought of an ipad when her brothers were making the first tv in their neighborhood from a kit either.
That's an interesting perspective and a good point to consider. I can find some similarities between the two re-imaginings of the Cherokee brand:

Driveline and suspension changed to more modern technology - In the first shift the brand went through suspension changes, like you said, as well as going for a more economical drive train. Lighter components and more fuel efficient engine were significant improvements. The same can be said about the XJ to the Whatever - the FWD/AWD system is technically interesting and the Pentastar engine is leaps and bounds ahead of the I6 for efficiency (longevity remains a question)

Styling changed to target current market - Large, bulky, rounded beast, that is essentially a full-size truck from the 70s, transformed into a small 80s boxy thing. Now the new version is some kind of alien bug like everything else out there.

However, this is where the re-imaginings differ:

Realizing competition with pickups from the big 3 wasn't working that well, moving to the smaller XJ platform was beneficial to Jeep. IMO it actually worked better with their brand as the lighter unibody XJ is more nimble. Something that's absolutely crucial is that it is still aiming at a very similar market as before. Advertising reflected this: Jeeps were for off road adventure.

With the new Cherokee, they are not targeting people who want to have an adventure; they're aiming for people who want to feel adventurous, without actually having to go on adventures. The new Cherokee's features and styling show this strongly. It's not more nimble. It doesn't have more cargo capacity. What it is is more comfortable and more efficient. And advertising reflects this lack of "Jeepness" as well: Driving over dirt roads. Wow. I can actually find more adverse conditions in this urban environment of 130k people.

So instead of people going backwoods camping, Jeep is targeting people that go to the mall with their lattes to buy more stuff from The North Face. This is a HUGE shift in the brand.

My problem is Chrysler rustling up a bunch of noise with "It's baaaaack!", and then dumping that. It's not back. It's nothing like it. It's something else!




Also, when I see this:



I think of this:

Except with 7 noses between his eyes and bright red pre-molars. But that's just personal taste.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 09:50 PM
  #183  
emptypockets's Avatar
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 6
From: Over here...
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
Default

Originally Posted by Cherokeekid4x4

Doesn't change My mind about them. Honestly you have to drive one. A "real jeep" to a girl is a wrangler. (In my experience) there are rare Cherokees with women owning one. ( compared to chicks with wranglers) and I didn't know they were making vehicles based off how old people were? I think it's more along the line off technology and the ever changing auto market place.
No, by real jeep she meant an older jeep.. I'd like to see you call her a chick to her face though...'

You continue to show your age kid. Cars are designed and advertised to appeal to different ages, genders, social status, and so on. Or did you think those cute little Kia hamsters were meant to draw in the baby boomers?
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 09:55 PM
  #184  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by emptypockets
Or did you think those cute little Kia hamsters were meant to draw in the baby boomers?
The 45+ women at my mother's office love the Kia Soul.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 09:58 PM
  #185  
emptypockets's Avatar
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 6
From: Over here...
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
Default

Originally Posted by salad

The 45+ women at my mother's office love the Kia Soul.
Still not the key demographic. It's a cheap econobox, built for people with a slimmer wallet. The price and warranty are the selling features.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 10:25 PM
  #186  
Cherokeekid4x4's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,652
Likes: 2
From: Kansas
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 190-hp, 4.0-liter I-6
Default

Originally Posted by emptypockets

No, by real jeep she meant an older jeep.. I'd like to see you call her a chick to her face though...'

You continue to show your age kid. Cars are designed and advertised to appeal to different ages, genders, social status, and so on. Or did you think those cute little Kia hamsters were meant to draw in the baby boomers?
So newer jeeps are not real jeeps? my bad And well I'm 17 and don't see the point in grown men complaining about a vehicle they have never seen or driven. To me that's like talking to a wall. Pointless. Not my age it's just having an open mind. Jeep has been working their butts off trying to appeal to the offroading community. Well guess what not every single model jeep makes is meant to climb mountains. The xj wasn't exactly meant for that either. (Although I did see someone post that it was the 4x4 of the year one year) which is cool don't get me wrong but it is also in the top 20 of SUVs for all uses. I don't see why they have to change the name. Tell me what it should look like then? I'd love to see. Please design a Cherokee every single person would love. And what does a Kia soul have to do with anything? Lol

Last edited by Cherokeekid4x4; Apr 3, 2013 at 10:32 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 11:13 PM
  #187  
XJ ONLY's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: Frazier Park, CA
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I'm 16 and I'm open to a lot of changes but I am for sure not open to the new "Cherokee". I've read reports about jeep talking about how different it is from the first generation of cherokee's. Jeep knows the new cherokee is different from our cherokees and they know that it won't appeal to anyone who wants a capable off-road vehicle. They named it a cherokee so that everyone would re-feel how it was to first drive in a real cherokee, so that fire would spark back up in everyone. But they didnt make it to be like the old cherokee, they made it so that city drivers would look at it and see the future of crossover suv's, but that's all the new jeep cherokee will ever be. Just another crossover. The new Jeep cherokee is not something that your dad brings home and lets you drive on a dirt road. It won't be a jeep that families pass down from generation to generation. Not something you wait all week just to get behind the wheel and take it on an old abandoned trail. Not something that is going to get people together to make memories. These things describe the "old" jeep cherokee. Change doesnt mean it is good.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 11:24 PM
  #188  
emptypockets's Avatar
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 6
From: Over here...
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
Default

Originally Posted by Cherokeekid4x4

So newer jeeps are not real jeeps? my bad And well I'm 17 and don't see the point in grown men complaining about a vehicle they have never seen or driven. To me that's like talking to a wall. Pointless. Not my age it's just having an open mind. Jeep has been working their butts off trying to appeal to the offroading community. Well guess what not every single model jeep makes is meant to climb mountains. The xj wasn't exactly meant for that either. (Although I did see someone post that it was the 4x4 of the year one year) which is cool don't get me wrong but it is also in the top 20 of SUVs for all uses. I don't see why they have to change the name. Tell me what it should look like then? I'd love to see. Please design a Cherokee every single person would love. And what does a Kia soul have to do with anything? Lol
Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall. If you can't figure out why I mentioned the Kia soul, read what you wrote above and then my reply.

To answer your question, no, it's not a real Jeep to me and countless others. It's a watered down product that needs the name Jeep and Cherokee on it to sell. Why not call it something else? Because there's name recognition and that's it. It's a Jeep in name only. You're 17 and I don't think you'll ever understand why people are pissed until you're older.

Jeep had meaning, it had soul, and it had character. You didn't drive a Jeep because it had the best mpg, the comfiest ride, whiz bang gadgets, or the best reliability. I don't think you get this part. It means something to those who understand it. This is the line between those who purchase cars like an appliance and those who are diehard enthusiasts.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 11:29 PM
  #189  
odgreen's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 15,581
Likes: 8
From: some small town oregon
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Jeep stopped producing decent vehicles in 06
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 11:31 PM
  #190  
emptypockets's Avatar
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 6
From: Over here...
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
Default

Originally Posted by XJ ONLY
I'm 16 and I'm open to a lot of changes but I am for sure not open to the new "Cherokee". I've read reports about jeep talking about how different it is from the first generation of cherokee's. Jeep knows the new cherokee is different from our cherokees and they know that it won't appeal to anyone who wants a capable off-road vehicle. They named it a cherokee so that everyone would re-feel how it was to first drive in a real cherokee, so that fire would spark back up in everyone. But they didnt make it to be like the old cherokee, they made it so that city drivers would look at it and see the future of crossover suv's, but that's all the new jeep cherokee will ever be. Just another crossover. The new Jeep cherokee is not something that your dad brings home and lets you drive on a dirt road. It won't be a jeep that families pass down from generation to generation. Not something you wait all week just to get behind the wheel and take it on an old abandoned trail. Not something that is going to get people together to make memories. These things describe the "old" jeep cherokee. Change doesnt mean it is good.
Bingo!
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 11:45 PM
  #191  
NewJerseyXJ609's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: l6 HO
Default

Originally Posted by XJ ONLY
I'm 16 and I'm open to a lot of changes but I am for sure not open to the new "Cherokee". I've read reports about jeep talking about how different it is from the first generation of cherokee's. Jeep knows the new cherokee is different from our cherokees and they know that it won't appeal to anyone who wants a capable off-road vehicle. They named it a cherokee so that everyone would re-feel how it was to first drive in a real cherokee, so that fire would spark back up in everyone. But they didnt make it to be like the old cherokee, they made it so that city drivers would look at it and see the future of crossover suv's, but that's all the new jeep cherokee will ever be. Just another crossover. The new Jeep cherokee is not something that your dad brings home and lets you drive on a dirt road. It won't be a jeep that families pass down from generation to generation. Not something you wait all week just to get behind the wheel and take it on an old abandoned trail. Not something that is going to get people together to make memories. These things describe the "old" jeep cherokee. Change doesnt mean it is good.
Don't make me cry
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 12:06 AM
  #192  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by Cherokeekid4x4
So newer jeeps are not real jeeps? my bad And well I'm 17 and don't see the point in grown men complaining about a vehicle they have never seen or driven.
vvv Sounds like you should hang out with this dude! lol vvv

Originally Posted by XJ ONLY
I'm 16 and I'm open to a lot of changes but I am for sure not open to the new "Cherokee" ... The new Jeep cherokee is not something that your dad brings home and lets you drive on a dirt road. It won't be a jeep that families pass down from generation to generation. Not something you wait all week just to get behind the wheel and take it on an old abandoned trail. Not something that is going to get people together to make memories. These things describe the "old" jeep cherokee. Change doesnt mean it is good.

Originally Posted by odgreen89on35s
Jeep stopped producing decent vehicles in 06
Yeah, man. KJ CRD fo lyfe

Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 12:33 AM
  #193  
odgreen's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 15,581
Likes: 8
From: some small town oregon
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by salad

Yeah, man. KJ CRD fo lyfe
I have no idea what that is. Lol
06 tj was the last decent thing that rolled off the factory floor.
Jk's are just that. A joke.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 12:36 AM
  #194  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by odgreen89on35s
I have no idea what that is. Lol
06 tj was the last decent thing that rolled off the factory floor.
Jk's are just that. A joke.
2006 Liberty with 2.8L VM Motori Common Rail Diesel lol

Yes the TJs were the last "real Jeeps", in multiple ways.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 01:40 AM
  #195  
thatXJguy's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Default

Just to note. This is an outright lie:



I don't see that Jeep conquering that terrain any time soon. Looks like the Jeep was backed into that location and poser-pictured.

Let's fix that:





At least we know the XJ would have been able to come down those rocks and into the shot.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.