Stock Grand Cherokee Tech. All ZJ/WJ/WK Non-modified/stock questions go here! ZJ (93-98), WJ (99-04), WK (05+)
All ZJ/WJ/WK specific tech questions asked here!

Are all V8 ZJs created equal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 03:12 AM
  #1  
Cruisingram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 41
Likes: 5
Model: Cherokee
Default Are all V8 ZJs created equal

I have a parts V8 ZJ with good trans, and my friend wants to buy the trans off me, for his good ZJ with bad trans. They are of the same "generation" but a couple years apart. They both have the 5.2 V8.
Should the trans between the jeeps be straight swap?
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 03:57 AM
  #2  
dave1123's Avatar
Old fart with a wrench
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,398
Likes: 741
From: Manlius, east of Syracuse, NY
Year: 2000 XJ Sport & WJ Laredo
Model: Grand Cherokee (WJ)
Engine: 4.0L
Default

The ZJs used 2 different transmissions, the AW4 and the 46re. Any ZJs built after 93 had the 46re, the AW4 being discontinued with the 93 models.

The problem comes in the transfer case. There were 3 different cases used in ZJs, the 231, the 242, and the 249. IDK if the 242 came with the V8s or not, but you may need the driveshafts as well for the swap. And maybe the t/case shift linkage and TCM.

Of course, you can probably just unbolt and use the original t/case. I just gave you that info if you had the opportunity to change from the 249.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 09:17 AM
  #3  
blackjack12982's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Cunningham, TN
Year: 1994
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2L
Default

Originally Posted by dave1123
The ZJs used 2 different transmissions, the AW4 and the 46re. Any ZJs built after 93 had the 46re, the AW4 being discontinued with the 93 models.

The problem comes in the transfer case. There were 3 different cases used in ZJs, the 231, the 242, and the 249. IDK if the 242 came with the V8s or not, but you may need the driveshafts as well for the swap. And maybe the t/case shift linkage and TCM.

Of course, you can probably just unbolt and use the original t/case. I just gave you that info if you had the opportunity to change from the 249.
Stop spreading bad information. V8 ZJ's used three different transmissions, 93-95 V8's had 46RH's, 96-98 5.2's had the 44RE, and the 98 5.9 had the 46RE.


To do a transfer case swap you don't need a TCM.

Transfer cases in V8's were only offered with NP249, it was never even an option for V8's to come in 231 or 242.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 12:56 PM
  #4  
Cruisingram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 41
Likes: 5
Model: Cherokee
Default

Blackjack- I am a bit confused over your post- please forgive- if the trans is on a V8, it will bolt up, right? If it is electronic shift, then you just need to swap the trans case
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 01:05 PM
  #5  
blackjack12982's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Cunningham, TN
Year: 1994
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2L
Default

Originally Posted by Cruisingram
Blackjack- I am a bit confused over your post- please forgive- if the trans is on a V8, it will bolt up, right? If it is electronic shift, then you just need to swap the trans case
Well, it's kind of hard to tell, you don't bother to list the years of either one of the ZJ's...

You don't have to swap the transfer case for a trans swap.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 03:45 PM
  #6  
Cruisingram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 41
Likes: 5
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by blackjack12982
Well, it's kind of hard to tell, you don't bother to list the years of either one of the ZJ's...

You don't have to swap the transfer case for a trans swap.
I am pretty sure the parts jeep is a 94. Can you tell year by VIN? This thing has the door stuff removed.
Attached Thumbnails Are all V8 ZJs created equal-v8-jeep-2-.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 03:59 PM
  #7  
blackjack12982's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Cunningham, TN
Year: 1994
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2L
Default

Originally Posted by Cruisingram
I am pretty sure the parts jeep is a 94. Can you tell year by VIN? This thing has the door stuff removed.
In the engine bay, on the top of the radiator is a sticker with usually the serpentine belt routing picture, spark plug gap, EPA exhaust statement, and the year of the vehicle. It says something about being compliant with all rules/regs for a stated year. Check both of them, or the door stickers. You could check the VIN, I'm sure Google has the info somewhere, but I don't know a site offhand.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 04:26 PM
  #8  
dave1123's Avatar
Old fart with a wrench
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,398
Likes: 741
From: Manlius, east of Syracuse, NY
Year: 2000 XJ Sport & WJ Laredo
Model: Grand Cherokee (WJ)
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Okay, blackjack. You seem to know a lot more than I do about ZJs. Run with it. I gave him all the info I gathered from the website and I only have owned 1 ZJ, a '97 with a 4.0.

And the TCM wasn't for the t/case swap, it was for the trans swap, fool!
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 04:32 PM
  #9  
Cruisingram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 41
Likes: 5
Model: Cherokee
Default

Thanks- it is shaping up that they are both 94s, and in that case, should be easy-peasy, right?
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 05:06 PM
  #10  
blackjack12982's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Cunningham, TN
Year: 1994
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2L
Default

Originally Posted by dave1123
And the TCM wasn't for the t/case swap, it was for the trans swap, fool!
It would be much more labor intensive for a 44/46RE swap in an early 5.2 ZJ, it would require the whole vehicle to be swapped from OBD I to OBD II. It's been done most recently on Speedfreaks, considering stock transmission wise, the 46RH is generally considered to be superior, unless you spend alot of money fully building the 46RE with 48RE components. Supposedly they just swap right in with some machining, building pretty bulletproof transmissions.

Originally Posted by Cruisingram
Thanks- it is shaping up that they are both 94s, and in that case, should be easy-peasy, right?
Yeah, it will be a plug and play swap.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 06:09 PM
  #11  
Cruisingram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 41
Likes: 5
Model: Cherokee
Default

Are those trans based on a 904 or 727 torqueflight?
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 06:11 PM
  #12  
blackjack12982's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Cunningham, TN
Year: 1994
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 5.2L
Default

Originally Posted by Cruisingram
Are those trans based on a 904 or 727 torqueflight?
The early 5.2's, and the 1998 5.9 are an adaptation of the 727, the I6's and later model (96-98) 5.2's are a 904.

*edit* That's generally why if you swap a 5.9 in a ZJ, it's usually done with greater success on a 93-95. These trans seem to hold up better than the later model 44RE's.

Last edited by blackjack12982; Jul 9, 2014 at 06:14 PM. Reason: correction
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 06:18 PM
  #13  
Cruisingram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 41
Likes: 5
Model: Cherokee
Default

I am an old mopar racer, so that makes sense LOL
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 09:13 PM
  #14  
Cruisingram's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 41
Likes: 5
Model: Cherokee
Default

Okay- both trans cases are 242s. One Jeep is a 94, the other a 96. They look visually identical on the outside and inside- same trim package!
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2014 | 09:27 PM
  #15  
Bustedback's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,367
Likes: 23
From: Oroville, CA
Year: 1995
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 with all of the noise and clatter
Default

A 94 t-case and a 96 t-case may look the same, but the spline count my be different.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 AM.