Jeep Builds Make your own jeep build thread here, discuss and view jeeps here. All Jeep models are welcome here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My Kinda Jeep

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2011 | 02:51 AM
  #136  
mountaineerjeff's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 3
From: West By God Virginia
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 99 4.0
Default

well the manifold got finished up today. the previous owner did not fully weld the TB flanges. the were just tacked, then sealed with RTV. I ground the welds out and pulled the flanges off. cleaned up them both and then got them fully welded like they should be. also plugged up the extra holes that were there from the PO. this will get coated tomorrow, to match everything else then it will be done.

Anyone have any idea on the best manifold gasket? I dont want to spend this much time on everything just for the gasket to leak.
Attached Thumbnails My Kinda Jeep-image05032011001226.jpg   My Kinda Jeep-image05032011034131.jpg   My Kinda Jeep-image05032011034147.jpg   My Kinda Jeep-image05032011034159.jpg  
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 12:26 PM
  #137  
1ABrian's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 1
From: New Hampshire
Year: 1997
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

If I go with the dual TBs then I will STAY NA which will be cheaper in the long run and give better mpgs. if I need more power than what will most likely be the highest HP 4.0 ever, then I will just spray. that will let me maintain my daily drivability and MPGs while still making boosted numbers.

The intake is coming out awsome but according to your statement above, if you run 1 TB for MPG's, either the front or rear cylinders will run rich for lack of air flow right? Thats why the stock manifold had a "center TB air intake" opposed to offset. Did I misunderstand the quote above?

Seems like you would HAVE to make both TB's functional all the time.

BTW, AWSOME tig welding

Last edited by 96_xj; May 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM. Reason: fixed quote
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 01:06 PM
  #138  
mountaineerjeff's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 3
From: West By God Virginia
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 99 4.0
Default

close but no cigar.

I posted that when I had not decided if I was going to run a 99+ manifold or this one. my choices were

99+manifold with super charger.
or dual TBs with N20.

I decided that DTBs and spray would be cheaper simpler and better for DD use. along with netting higher MPGs.

As far as your question goes I def could run the dual manifold with a block off plate and one TB. think about every 4 cylinder (besides jeep) they have a manifold with a single offset TB. the idea is the entire plenum has the same internal pressure. No matter what it would still flow better then the stock thumb sized plenum.
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 01:29 PM
  #139  
96_xj's Avatar
Honorary Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 16
From: Gilbert AZ/Las Cruces NM
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 upgraded
Default

but all offset manifolds have a better flow design MEANT to be run offset..




the cherokee manifold is a T set up with very sharp angles, not a swoop set up which means you will not get the air needed if you only run 1 TB for whatever reason.

and you do mean turbo right? because this is a turbo not a super charger....



and considering that you can weld. it would be alot cheaper to make a log style manifold, make an inter cooler, and just get the proper piping for your intake/exhaust set up and use.



I have seen 2 builds so far use this style set up, and because they can fab, even tho it is a tight fit it was under the $600 range easy.

I guess what I am getting at is how is Spray more cost effective?

i can see being simpler. the engine bay is a little small for a T4 turbo:



but i am talk about over all use, one is more work a little more upfront cost the other is going to run you with problems and nickel and dime you to be more expensive.

plus the numbers ppl net from a turbo set up are fantastic!!! I highly doubt you will net the same numbers

Last edited by 96_xj; May 3, 2011 at 01:33 PM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 01:32 PM
  #140  
96_xj's Avatar
Honorary Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 16
From: Gilbert AZ/Las Cruces NM
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 upgraded
Default

Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 01:47 PM
  #141  
96_xj's Avatar
Honorary Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 16
From: Gilbert AZ/Las Cruces NM
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 upgraded
Default

Also With the Dual TB's I hope you have a plan for the Spray to distribute it evenly.

whether that be you Y pipe both TB's and you have your tip at the front of the Y pipe, of you make to injection plates, 1 for each TB. if not you will get a strong spray on either the top or the bottom 3 cylinders and the other will get a weak spray. That will result in a big enough heat variation cylinder to cylinder that you will basically destroy your motor
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 04:17 PM
  #142  
mountaineerjeff's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 3
From: West By God Virginia
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 99 4.0
Default

this is actually how most 4 cylinder manifolds are. but its irrelevant cause that was only an example of an emergency situation. I am obviously going to be running DTBs.

and no I meant supercharger. the option was to supercharge it, as I have long time ago decided against turbo on an offroad vehicle, especially that has huge underhood temp issues.

as far as N20 vs SC vs Turbo

the price is going to all be very similar but n20 will be by far the easiest. there will be much less wear on the engine and it doesnt get ran 99% of the time. It will only be used when I need to get out of the mud, make it up a hill, or set a record 1/4 time. that is what will save me a ton of money the cost in fuel/repairs/and maintenance make n20 much cheaper. this jeep is going to get a ton of street miles and the power I make will be more than enough 99.9% of the time, having the ability to only use it when I need it.

the spray will def be routed properly, most likely tapped into the bottom of the manifold.
Attached Thumbnails My Kinda Jeep-smim_002.jpg  

Last edited by mountaineerjeff; May 3, 2011 at 04:21 PM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 08:54 PM
  #143  
91armygreenXJ's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

turbo xj?? what?
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 09:05 PM
  #144  
96_xj's Avatar
Honorary Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 16
From: Gilbert AZ/Las Cruces NM
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 upgraded
Default

Originally Posted by 91armygreenXJ
turbo xj?? what?
http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1039377
http://www.505performance.com/
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 09:20 PM
  #145  
mountaineerjeff's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 3
From: West By God Virginia
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 99 4.0
Default

no, bolt-on xj with N20.

oh, unless you meant in general and yeah thats def nothing new
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 09:29 PM
  #146  
91armygreenXJ's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

ive just never seen one with that on it. its pretty neat in my opinion, i wouldnt do it, but thats because i dont have money to do it
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 09:34 AM
  #147  
1ABrian's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 1
From: New Hampshire
Year: 1997
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Spray or not, to run 1 TB at one end and expect the last 2 cylinders to be getting sufficient air/fuel mix will be tough. They'll be rich. Don't get me wrong, it'll run but I think boosted would be the way to go to force the air through that intake IMO.
Reply
Old May 5, 2011 | 11:06 PM
  #148  
mountaineerjeff's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 3
From: West By God Virginia
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 99 4.0
Default

well thats cool, but there is no plan to run one offset TB anyway. it was to run a boosted 99+ intake OR my dual TBs

I have obviously decided to run my DUAL THROTTLE BODY MANIFOLD WITH TWO THROTTLE BODIES.

I dont know why you guys like to just make up whatever you want because I had never said I would put all this time in on a DTB manifold to run a single TB. the only thing remotely similar that I had ever said to anyone, was that I could run it on one TB while working on the tuning IF I HAD to.


I am still waiting on my parts jeep, and I have been busy the past couple days so no real progress.
Reply
Old May 5, 2011 | 11:46 PM
  #149  
odgreen's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 15,581
Likes: 8
From: some small town oregon
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

All i know is your plan is effin crazy and sweet as hell at the same time! Lol! I cant wait to see it running.
Reply
Old May 6, 2011 | 12:02 AM
  #150  
mountaineerjeff's Avatar
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 3
From: West By God Virginia
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 99 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by odgreen89on35s
All i know is your plan is effin crazy and sweet as hell at the same time! Lol! I cant wait to see it running.

thanks a ton man, thats really all i can hope for. I start summer school in 2 weeks so it better be running by then.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.