Marijuana legalized in WA
Seasoned Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma,WA
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.o
I actually remember back in health class when they would tell us that the smoke from a "marijuana cigarette" is yadda yadda percent more likely to cause cancer than tobacco cigarettes. Now look at today, they give marijuana to cancer patients.. because the exact opposite is true
.
. It is given to cancer patients to help alleviate symptoms like pain and make you hungry while taking chemo. Anyone that has seen someone go through chemo knows that without it it is near impossible to eat food and keep it in you, weed helps with this. In the end it is still a carcinogen if smoked and that can still cause cancer of the lungs.
CF Veteran
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 6
From: Summerville, Ga
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5 4 cyl.
They don't give weed to cancer patients because it cures cancer nor does it help fight cancer
. It is given to cancer patients to help alleviate symptoms like pain and make you hungry while taking chemo. Anyone that has seen someone go through chemo knows that without it it is near impossible to eat food and keep it in you, weed helps with this. In the end it is still a carcinogen if smoked and that can still cause cancer of the lungs.
. It is given to cancer patients to help alleviate symptoms like pain and make you hungry while taking chemo. Anyone that has seen someone go through chemo knows that without it it is near impossible to eat food and keep it in you, weed helps with this. In the end it is still a carcinogen if smoked and that can still cause cancer of the lungs.And as far as smoking it causing cancer... Why would they give something to cancer patients that CAUSES cancer?
There's a small possibility it could lead to cancer yes, but as far as proven facts go... Theres never been a single case of cancer related to the smoking of Marijuana.
Not to be "that guy" but the opposite of causing cancer is...well...preventing or curing...
And thats the dbag thing to point out.
hopefully I'm not taken seriously with that.
Anyway...there are other ways of ingesting pot. Eating, vaporizing, rubbing it on your face....
And thats the dbag thing to point out.
hopefully I'm not taken seriously with that.Anyway...there are other ways of ingesting pot. Eating, vaporizing, rubbing it on your face....
CF Veteran

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 5
From: Pahrump, NV
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Anything smoked could cause cancer. I know people who smoked cigs all of their lives, and no cancer. Some people get hit by busses.
It has been proven that the active chemicals in marijuana inhibit the growth of cancer. Inhibits, not cures. Let's say ppl who smoke only cigarettes have a 75% chance of getting lung cancer, someone who smokes weed and cigarettes has a 50% chance, and only weed 25% chance. No my numbers aren't accurate, made them up to show a point.
When people are prescribed marijuana for cancer, smoking is never recommended, except for vaporizing. When you vaporize, all you are doing is baking the tuff that gets you high, not burning the carcinogens. Eat, and drink and vapor is what try tell you.
There is a receptor in your brain, that is only activated by one thing on this earth, the cannabinoid receptor, activated by cannabinol.
Why? Except for the appendix, we really don't have to many useless parts in our bodies.
It has been proven that the active chemicals in marijuana inhibit the growth of cancer. Inhibits, not cures. Let's say ppl who smoke only cigarettes have a 75% chance of getting lung cancer, someone who smokes weed and cigarettes has a 50% chance, and only weed 25% chance. No my numbers aren't accurate, made them up to show a point.
When people are prescribed marijuana for cancer, smoking is never recommended, except for vaporizing. When you vaporize, all you are doing is baking the tuff that gets you high, not burning the carcinogens. Eat, and drink and vapor is what try tell you.
There is a receptor in your brain, that is only activated by one thing on this earth, the cannabinoid receptor, activated by cannabinol.
Why? Except for the appendix, we really don't have to many useless parts in our bodies.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Mt. Vernon Washington
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Renix and tube header
Not to be "that guy" but the opposite of causing cancer is...well...preventing or curing...
And thats the dbag thing to point out.
hopefully I'm not taken seriously with that.
Anyway...there are other ways of ingesting pot. Eating, vaporizing, rubbing it on your face....
And thats the dbag thing to point out.
hopefully I'm not taken seriously with that.Anyway...there are other ways of ingesting pot. Eating, vaporizing, rubbing it on your face....

Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: str 6
I keep seein people say that whether its legal or illegal it's not gonna affect those who already smoke pot.
I think this can be used as an argument against gun control laws. People who want to get a gun to commit a crime arn't gonna care if there's a law saying you can't buy one. The only people who follow the laws are the ones who are now going to be victims to the guy who has the gun.
Kinda of topic, but I just thought of it while reading this.
I think this can be used as an argument against gun control laws. People who want to get a gun to commit a crime arn't gonna care if there's a law saying you can't buy one. The only people who follow the laws are the ones who are now going to be victims to the guy who has the gun.
Kinda of topic, but I just thought of it while reading this.
CF Veteran

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 5
From: Pahrump, NV
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Originally Posted by 01cherokeelimited
I keep seein people say that whether its legal or illegal it's not gonna affect those who already smoke pot.
I think this can be used as an argument against gun control laws. People who want to get a gun to commit a crime arn't gonna care if there's a law saying you can't buy one. The only people who follow the laws are the ones who are now going to be victims to the guy who has the gun.
Kinda of topic, but I just thought of it while reading this.
I think this can be used as an argument against gun control laws. People who want to get a gun to commit a crime arn't gonna care if there's a law saying you can't buy one. The only people who follow the laws are the ones who are now going to be victims to the guy who has the gun.
Kinda of topic, but I just thought of it while reading this.
Seasoned Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma,WA
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.o
there are 33 known carcinogens in weed, carcinogens cause cancer of the lungs. As to why they would they give something to someone who is dying of cancer that could cause cancer I already explained. Without it many people could not survive the chemo to beat the cancer they have. In order to get chemo you have to be able to be strong enough to survive it, hence weed makes you eat and keep the food in your stomach, which in turn gets nutrients in your body in turn making your body strong enough to be able to get chemo and survive your cancer. The funny thing is smoking anything ruins most of the benefits from the item, there are better ways to get high from it other than smoking it.
If you think doctors won't give you something bad to fight your symptoms take the time to look up the side effects of Tylenol that is about a 3 page warning on different ways it can kill you all in the name of a headache
If you think doctors won't give you something bad to fight your symptoms take the time to look up the side effects of Tylenol that is about a 3 page warning on different ways it can kill you all in the name of a headache
Seasoned Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma,WA
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.o
Not to be "that guy" but the opposite of causing cancer is...well...preventing or curing...
And thats the dbag thing to point out.
hopefully I'm not taken seriously with that.
Anyway...there are other ways of ingesting pot. Eating, vaporizing, rubbing it on your face....
And thats the dbag thing to point out.
hopefully I'm not taken seriously with that.Anyway...there are other ways of ingesting pot. Eating, vaporizing, rubbing it on your face....

. So that meth Joe is smoking on the corner isn't causing cancer so it must be preventing or curing...
I was pointing out that someone said "it does the exact opposite of causing cancer..."
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: Mt. Vernon Washington
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Renix and tube header
You also have to remember that people smoke a whole lot more cigarrettes because they are addicting. Weed is not addicting, so therefore people are less likely to smoke the quantities to cause cancer to arise, like we see with people who smoke packs of cigs a day throughout their life. These aren't facts, just what makes sense to me.
Last edited by gilbertxj466; Nov 14, 2012 at 01:06 PM.
CF Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 4
From: Oak Harbor, WA.
Year: 1987
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 liter RENIX I-6, DIY Cold Air Intake, 2.5 FM Exhaust, 3 Core Radiator
I personally voted no on the Legalization of Marijuana in the state of Washington. I've never personally smoked anything. I grew up with a father who smoked and after Quadruple Bypass Surgery he still sneaks a ciggy now and and again. Smoking will kill him eventually. I also had a Father-In-Law who smoked ciggys all his life and died from Lung Cancer. It was already said in this thread a few times as I read. Anything that is smoked is POISON to your lungs. It will kill you and OBTW the second hand smoke will kill others who are around you when you smoke and breathe your poison in. That being said, I'm all about Legalizing it in Washington so long as the state government taxes the S**T out of it and puts the money toward better schools, better pay for teachers, better highways, law enforcement, fire fighters and of course the DNR and Forestry Service. Let people who want to smoke, ciggys, pot or whatever else into their lungs smoke up and kill themselves off. Also let them foot the bill for a big chunk of the state debt our wonderful Democrat politicians who keep getting voted in have caused. One less smoker causing clouds where I have to be and Weed smokers paying a chunk or bigger chunk to get Washington out of debt, works for me.
CF Veteran

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 5
From: Pahrump, NV
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Originally Posted by BuckB91XJ
I personally voted no on the Legalization of Marijuana in the state of Washington. I've never personally smoked anything. I grew up with a father who smoked and after Quadruple Bypass Surgery he still sneaks a ciggy now and and again. Smoking will kill him eventually. I also had a Father-In-Law who smoked ciggys all his life and died from Lung Cancer. It was already said in this thread a few times as I read. Anything that is smoked is POISON to your lungs. It will kill you and OBTW the second hand smoke will kill others who are around you when you smoke and breathe your poison in. That being said, I'm all about Legalizing it in Washington so long as the state government taxes the S**T out of it and puts the money toward better schools, better pay for teachers, better highways, law enforcement, fire fighters and of course the DNR and Forestry Service. Let people who want to smoke, ciggys, pot or whatever else into their lungs smoke up and kill themselves off. Also let them foot the bill for a big chunk of the state debt our wonderful Democrat politicians who keep getting voted in have caused. One less smoker causing clouds where I have to be and Weed smokers paying a chunk or bigger chunk to get Washington out of debt, works for me.


