exhaust manifold replace or not

Subscribe
Oct 20, 2016 | 06:51 PM
  #1  
Should this exhaust manifold be replaced? . It does not leak, just looks bad. Not sure how much life is left in it. Not sure if anyone can give advice based off a pic. Thanks.

Reply 0
Oct 20, 2016 | 06:52 PM
  #2  
if it's not leaking...don't touch it.
Reply 0
Oct 20, 2016 | 07:20 PM
  #3  
Quote: if it's not leaking...don't touch it.
ok thanks.
Reply 0
Oct 20, 2016 | 10:38 PM
  #4  
The later years don't crack and leak like the older model. They look fine. They're cast iron.
Reply 0
Oct 21, 2016 | 07:03 AM
  #5  
Water treatment time when you get it all back together!
Reply 0
Oct 22, 2016 | 09:48 PM
  #6  
So the 2000's have 2 manifolds? Was this a fix for the cracking on the straight 6 manifold? I kind of am used to my morning diesel sounds.
Reply 0
Oct 22, 2016 | 10:59 PM
  #7  
Yeah, the design change is to accommodate the additional catalytic converters. 2000 California and all 4.0Ls 2001 and newer have a pair of additional catalytic converters installed right in the downpipe. The engine was split into two banks with four O2 sensors, upstream and downstream of each mini cat:

Name:  2000_2001exhaust.jpg
Views: 170
Size:  538.1 KB

The 2000 Federal versions got straight pipes in place of the miniature cats and O2 sensors in the usual places. They kept the separate manifolds for cyls 1-3 and 4-6 and the different collector pipe.

The upside of this design is that the welds don't have nearly as much leverage on them. The original manifold - very long - had a ton of leverage on that one weld where the two runners joint at the collector. The newer style has much more room to flex. Although a braided flex pipe is the real solution...


Reply 0
Oct 23, 2016 | 06:42 AM
  #8  
O that's a pretty good upgrade. I bet there is a lot less failure from heat cracking too.
Reply 0
Oct 23, 2016 | 08:23 AM
  #9  
Quote: It does not leak, just looks bad.
Looks fine to me. They all look like that. If you bought a brand new one, it would look like that within a year or two of normal use and would still be perfectly fine.

On the other hand, if you're looking for an excuse to replace it with a Banks Torque Tubes header... Yeah, man, that looks terrible. You really need that header.

Quote: Although a braided flex pipe is the real solution...
Good motor mounts are the real solution.
Reply 0
Oct 23, 2016 | 01:35 PM
  #10  
Quote: Looks fine to me. They all look like that. If you bought a brand new one, it would look like that within a year or two of normal use and would still be perfectly fine.

On the other hand, if you're looking for an excuse to replace it with a Banks Torque Tubes header... Yeah, man, that looks terrible. You really need that header.

LOL. I wish I had the money to spend on it. I would have liked to get a performance cylinder head replacement too, but couldn't justify spending the extra money on a vehicle I drive less than 5k miles a year.
Reply 0
Oct 23, 2016 | 11:11 PM
  #11  
Quote: So the 2000's have 2 manifolds? Was this a fix for the cracking on the straight 6 manifold? I kind of am used to my morning diesel sounds.
Yeah, I had those diesel sounds too, but got tired of the clatter finally and bit the bullet and did the project.
Here is a write up earlier this year FWIW.

https://www.cherokeeforum.com/f2/ins...y-pics-223819/

I am real happy with the results.
Reply 0
Oct 24, 2016 | 09:01 AM
  #12  
Quote: Good motor mounts are the real solution.
Not really. The entire exhaust on XJs is rigid. That's a lot of leverage just asking for trouble. Put in a flex pipe and never have a cracked manifold again, regardless of mount condition.
Reply 0
Subscribe
Currently Active Users (1)