Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

'96 XJ 4.0 Carburated?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 12:14 AM
  #1  
'96XJSport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default '96 XJ 4.0 Carburated?

just curious ... i am working on a buddys ford and we have decided to go carburated... to eliminate alot of the computer issues and wiring that we are having due to a new motor that we are puttin in ... that got me thinking about possibly doing a carb swap with my jeep... has anyone done this before? im sure someone has lol ... i cannot find a manifold online anywhere ... help is appreciated in advance
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 12:34 AM
  #2  
5-90's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 23
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: AMC242
Default

Originally Posted by '96XJSport
just curious ... i am working on a buddys ford and we have decided to go carburated... to eliminate alot of the computer issues and wiring that we are having due to a new motor that we are puttin in ... that got me thinking about possibly doing a carb swap with my jeep... has anyone done this before? im sure someone has lol ... i cannot find a manifold online anywhere ... help is appreciated in advance
You won't find one easily - there's no such thing as a carburetted 242ci from the factory, and no-one has (yet) made an aftermarket carbed manifold for it.

You may want to pillage around Clifford Performance or HESCO and see if they have something that can be adapted, but I'm inclined to doubt it. Besides, OBD-II is miles better than OBD-I. What trouble are you having?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 12:41 AM
  #3  
'96XJSport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

its not so much that im having troubles im just pretty bored to be honest with you ... lol i do have a bad trans control module an so i had to test alot of wiring to come to that conclusion so it just got me thinking back to my old chevy k10 that i used to have and how much simpler carburated rigs are
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 01:17 AM
  #4  
Metmknice's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 2
From: Hell, CA
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

Well, everything, including the trans is electronically controlled. So how would you control the trans or the fuel? How would you pass smog? I'm pretty sure that you would have a CEL if you unplugged all that stuff. And most palces now do a OBD test with the smog. If you want something that is less complex. Try an OBDI or Renix XJ.
If you want a carbed or TBI motor, my suggestion would be to buy a different vehicle. Up until the early 90's the Wranglers were carbed.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 01:30 AM
  #5  
'96XJSport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Metmknice
Well, everything, including the trans is electronically controlled. So how would you control the trans or the fuel? How would you pass smog? I'm pretty sure that you would have a CEL if you unplugged all that stuff. And most palces now do a OBD test with the smog. If you want something that is less complex. Try an OBDI or Renix XJ.
If you want a carbed or TBI motor, my suggestion would be to buy a different vehicle. Up until the early 90's the Wranglers were carbed.
they make stand alone trans conrollers and i dont have to pass smog where i live as well... i havnt made up my mind yet but im still thinking about it ... it would be something different thats for sure
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 06:03 AM
  #6  
EndlessMtnFab's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 750
Likes: 4
From: Blakeslee, PA
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.7
Default

Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.



Your local requirements may be one thing -- but it's a federal offense to tamper with emissons in that manner.





Joe
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 06:35 AM
  #7  
ktmracer419's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 14
Default

thats a step backwards

old technology
and more of a pita than fuel injection
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #8  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

Originally Posted by Metmknice
Try an OBDI or Renix XJ.
The renix system is more complex than a OBD I/II.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 07:09 AM
  #9  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

If you like simple stuff, get rid of tank, pump, a ton of wires and sensors, injectors, carb, fuel lines, filters, control module, everything and install a propane kit.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 07:36 AM
  #10  
xjbones's Avatar
Registered Users
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Year: 91 with lots of 01' parts
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 01' 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by fantic238
If you like simple stuff, get rid of tank, pump, a ton of wires and sensors, injectors, carb, fuel lines, filters, control module, everything and install a propane kit.


^^^^i like ur way of thinking!!
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 07:45 AM
  #11  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

Originally Posted by xjbones
^^^^i like ur way of thinking!!
Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #12  
Cobrasix's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Carb's aren't necessarily a step backwards...depends on the purpose. A well tuned and maintained carb can get mileage and emissions just as good as EFI. My 65 mustang has better emissions than my wife's 99 mustang. The difference? I have to retune the 65 every season when it changes temp more than 20*. I have to rebuild the carb every 2-3 years to keep it tip-top running order. I've never touched any part of the EFI system on my wife's 99 other than cleaning the throttle body once a year.

As far as converting from EFI to CARB, unless you were making a track racing car, it would not be a good idea generally. Carbs can be finicky to altitude changes (bad for off roading), seasonal temperature changes, etc. You'd also have to change out the fuel pump since your EFI fuel pump will over pressurize the carb and blow out the seals.

Carb's are any more of a PITA than EFI if you are familiar with carbs. I've spent countless hours hunting down fuel delivery problems on friend's cars...I can rebuild a holley 4V carb in 2 (1 if I actually pay attention the entire time).

But in the end, i would keep with EFI. It is so nice to just turn the key.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #13  
5-90's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,018
Likes: 23
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: AMC242
Default

Originally Posted by fantic238
The renix system is more complex than a OBD I/II.
I wouldn't say that.

In order of complexity of service (high to low,) I'd go with OBD-I/OBD-II/RENIX.

OBD-I wasn't really standardised across the industry, which is why it's the worst of the two. OBD-II follows an industry standard set by SAE - they took over from CARB.

RENIX is often perceived as difficult, but the lack of OBD makes it easier to work on - if you're used to doing your own thinking (I am.)
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 03:05 AM
  #14  
fantic238's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,383
Likes: 5
Year: 1988 limited
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 litre
Default

Originally Posted by 5-90
I wouldn't say that.

In order of complexity of service (high to low,) I'd go with OBD-I/OBD-II/RENIX.

OBD-I wasn't really standardised across the industry, which is why it's the worst of the two. OBD-II follows an industry standard set by SAE - they took over from CARB.

RENIX is often perceived as difficult, but the lack of OBD makes it easier to work on - if you're used to doing your own thinking (I am.)
I am not talking about the difficulty to work on, i'm saying it is electronically more complex. It has a couple of sensors more than the OBD I/II.
It was created by Renault and Bendix for formula 1 cars, but then was dropped for it's high complexity.

from wikipedia: ..."The Renix system has more inputs than the later Mopar system and in some ways is more complex"...

link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renix

PS: everybody should read this it is very interesting.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #15  
Abovetimberline's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,158
Likes: 11
From: Chico,ca
Year: 89
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

The thing I do not like about carbs is they do not run well on angles and tend to die easily.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.