87 Renix XJ with irritating intermittent miss
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 24
From: Nor-Cal Coast
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
Yea...I finally made it to the Dealer in Brookings a few weeks ago. Not only did they not have my T-stat, nobody had asked for one for 2 years....Then online you get gouged for more than the price just for shipping.
No doubt running rich delays warm up, and going down hill is no help there. I have a 195* that tests right on with a digital probe. Not sure WHEN I get to 195* though. Anyway I bought the correct flow rate injectors, no going back now. Maybe I eat crow! or not. Anyway at $36 shippped selling my 8-703's might "ease the pain"
I'll post honest results. I don't expect much, but it REALLY seems to suck on short trips, which is allot of what I do. Just going from 12 to 14 would be about a 20% improvement.
No doubt running rich delays warm up, and going down hill is no help there. I have a 195* that tests right on with a digital probe. Not sure WHEN I get to 195* though. Anyway I bought the correct flow rate injectors, no going back now. Maybe I eat crow! or not. Anyway at $36 shippped selling my 8-703's might "ease the pain"
I'll post honest results. I don't expect much, but it REALLY seems to suck on short trips, which is allot of what I do. Just going from 12 to 14 would be about a 20% improvement.
::CF Moderator::
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,579
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Yea...I finally made it to the Dealer in Brookings a few weeks ago. Not only did they not have my T-stat, nobody had asked for one for 2 years....Then online you get gouged for more than the price just for shipping.
No doubt running rich delays warm up, and going down hill is no help there. I have a 195* that tests right on with a digital probe. Not sure WHEN I get to 195* though. Anyway I bought the correct flow rate injectors, no going back now. Maybe I eat crow! or not. Anyway at $36 shippped selling my 8-703's might "ease the pain"
I'll post honest results. I don't expect much, but it REALLY seems to suck on short trips, which is allot of what I do. Just going from 12 to 14 would be about a 20% improvement.
No doubt running rich delays warm up, and going down hill is no help there. I have a 195* that tests right on with a digital probe. Not sure WHEN I get to 195* though. Anyway I bought the correct flow rate injectors, no going back now. Maybe I eat crow! or not. Anyway at $36 shippped selling my 8-703's might "ease the pain"
I'll post honest results. I don't expect much, but it REALLY seems to suck on short trips, which is allot of what I do. Just going from 12 to 14 would be about a 20% improvement.
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 24
From: Nor-Cal Coast
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
No look again, it's a 195*, coolant coming in the bottle tests right with a digital probe.
When my 02 sensor was stone, cold dead, she really had an issue warming up. It made a huge difference with the heat/defrost when I took care of that. I'm sure you remember following that thread. Changing the 02 sensor made a huge difference in the warmup time.
After going trough that I'm very wary of all that evaporating gas sucking heat out of the system. I use the same mechanism in my absorption frig to freeze my freezer. I don't think I need that much fuel evaporating in my cold engine. Guess we will see!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorption_refrigerator
"Both absorption and compressor refrigerators use a refrigerant with a very low boiling point (less than 0 °F/−18 °C). In both types, when this refrigerant evaporates (boils), it takes some heat away with it, providing the cooling effect."
Pardon me Pete. I guess is was some posts back I mentioned it runs at 195* The reference to 160* was a suggested crossover to closed loop.
When my 02 sensor was stone, cold dead, she really had an issue warming up. It made a huge difference with the heat/defrost when I took care of that. I'm sure you remember following that thread. Changing the 02 sensor made a huge difference in the warmup time.
After going trough that I'm very wary of all that evaporating gas sucking heat out of the system. I use the same mechanism in my absorption frig to freeze my freezer. I don't think I need that much fuel evaporating in my cold engine. Guess we will see!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorption_refrigerator
"Both absorption and compressor refrigerators use a refrigerant with a very low boiling point (less than 0 °F/−18 °C). In both types, when this refrigerant evaporates (boils), it takes some heat away with it, providing the cooling effect."
Pardon me Pete. I guess is was some posts back I mentioned it runs at 195* The reference to 160* was a suggested crossover to closed loop.
Last edited by DFlintstone; Feb 13, 2013 at 10:16 PM.
::CF Moderator::
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,579
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
I think the warming up and the O2 sensor deal is a coincidence. If default was that rich, these things would never have passed the EPA test.
How come I can park my Jeeps in the driveway Idling and they come up to 195? How come I can start them up and drive 2 miles under pretty much no-load and be up to 195? How come I couldn't do that with 3 different Stant Superstats?
I know how refrigerant works. I work with propane. But our coolant boils at 212 not -44F.
How come I can park my Jeeps in the driveway Idling and they come up to 195? How come I can start them up and drive 2 miles under pretty much no-load and be up to 195? How come I couldn't do that with 3 different Stant Superstats?
I know how refrigerant works. I work with propane. But our coolant boils at 212 not -44F.
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 24
From: Nor-Cal Coast
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
I'm talking about gasoline, not water.
No, no coincidence. Long time, no real heat until hitting the hill after the flat at the bottom. FIRST DAY after the new 02 sensor, heat before getting to the bottom of the hill. That would be a very odd coincidence.
Yea, I did go to the dealer for an OEM stat. No luck there.
No, no coincidence. Long time, no real heat until hitting the hill after the flat at the bottom. FIRST DAY after the new 02 sensor, heat before getting to the bottom of the hill. That would be a very odd coincidence.
Yea, I did go to the dealer for an OEM stat. No luck there.
::CF Moderator::
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 43,971
Likes: 1,579
From: Prescott, Az
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
I'm talking about gasoline, not water.
No, no coincidence. Long time, no real heat until hitting the hill after the flat at the bottom. FIRST DAY after the new 02 sensor, heat before getting to the bottom of the hill. That would be a very odd coincidence.
Ain't buying it.
Yea, I did go to the dealer for an OEM stat. No luck there.
No, no coincidence. Long time, no real heat until hitting the hill after the flat at the bottom. FIRST DAY after the new 02 sensor, heat before getting to the bottom of the hill. That would be a very odd coincidence.
Ain't buying it.
Yea, I did go to the dealer for an OEM stat. No luck there.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Year: 1987
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I messaged programbo again about 703 vs ford 19# and he says that the 703 are still the better choice for my '87 not just because I wouldnt have to change the FPR and fuel rail but because they are a closer match to the flow rate of the original injectors. I'll be getting a set of 703 soon.
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 24
From: Nor-Cal Coast
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
They will work well! I'm hanging onto mine until I see what the 280-155-746 works out like. Yea don't know if I would want to count on the rail holding 700's without the clip....I'm not packing any marshmallows!
The Renix uses 18.6 lBs/Hr. If the 703's flow 23 lbs/hr, they might be better suited for the HO.
Last edited by DFlintstone; Feb 13, 2013 at 11:33 PM.
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,074
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County, New Jersey U.S.A.
Year: 1990 Laredo
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Inline 6 Renix
They will work well! I'm hanging onto mine until I see what the 280-155-746 works out like. Yea don't know if I would want to count on the rail holding 700's without the clip....I'm not packing any marshmallows!
The Renix uses 18.6 lBs/Hr. If the 703's flow 23 lbs/hr, they might be better suited for the HO.
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 24
From: Nor-Cal Coast
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
10-4 Rooster....remind me, surely I'll be jabbering about it after the new are in!
Last edited by DFlintstone; Feb 14, 2013 at 01:02 AM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Year: 1987
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I looked at my injectors today and they have a Lucas part number of D3800BA and they have a light blue band around the tops (number fits Lucas part number format "D3***BA"). I couldn't find anything online about them so I'm guessing that these are the original injectors?
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 24
From: Nor-Cal Coast
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
I'm no real help. I got 66 hits googleing the #, I'm sure you could look more there > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...pe=&as_rights=
Mine I removed have the same #, but I'm sure they were replaced, not the actual originals.
Mine I removed have the same #, but I'm sure they were replaced, not the actual originals.
CF Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,489
Likes: 24
From: Nor-Cal Coast
Year: 90,84
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0,2.5
[QUOTE=cruiser54;2308968]I think the warming up and the O2 sensor deal is a coincidence. If default was that rich, these things would never have passed the EPA test. /QUOTE]
Good point. Maybe that is what the hot air intake business is about. Idk, but point taken. Maybe they don't test it decelerating cold is my problem. We will see! If I see a 1-1/2 MPG improvement in my "knocken around" mileage I'll call that "statistically significant", and a win.
I have consecutive data on my last 35 fill-ups (or so). The seller showed 6 (746's) and used plural "injectors". He is not going to be to happy if he just ships one. He is in Oakland, where I spent some of my early years.
Good point. Maybe that is what the hot air intake business is about. Idk, but point taken. Maybe they don't test it decelerating cold is my problem. We will see! If I see a 1-1/2 MPG improvement in my "knocken around" mileage I'll call that "statistically significant", and a win.
I have consecutive data on my last 35 fill-ups (or so). The seller showed 6 (746's) and used plural "injectors". He is not going to be to happy if he just ships one. He is in Oakland, where I spent some of my early years.


