Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

33s vs 32s

Old 01-07-2008, 08:00 AM
  #1  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
dabeast727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: raleigh, nc
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default 33s vs 32s

Hey i got 32s now and it doesnt get the best MPGs or the best acceleration and all that, i knw i should go to 4.10s but when my tires run out, how much worse would it be if i went to 33s on stock axles? next set i get will be all terrains so that might help make up for it in terms of drivability. but i mean is that like a huge threshold to pass or is it okay to run these 33s? ive seen the gas mileage i get on 32s so will it be THAT MUCH WORSE? aight thanks guys. btw i got 32 bfg MT now and im thinking of going to 33 BFG AT
Old 01-07-2008, 10:59 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,363
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

it wont be THAT much worse but you will notice it. as a rule of thumb generally the cut off point for gearing is anything bigger then 33's. with your c8.25 you will not have a problem running the 33's. the biggest thing is the loss of power/MPG. but it is doable.

-Kyle
Old 01-07-2008, 12:21 PM
  #3  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
dabeast727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: raleigh, nc
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

pretty much what i figured. i thikn since theyre at's that'll help. CLutch is gonna hate it though so i probobly wont do that unless i swap out the clutch as well. How long do the clutches usually last? i try not to slip it much but it gets annoying b/c of the tires.
Old 01-09-2008, 12:32 PM
  #4  
Newbie
 
jeepbogger4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i went from 32 at's to 33 boggers and my mpg sucks. i'm gonna regear sometime in the future. prolly to 3.73's cuz i don't want to go to 4.10's but you will be able to run 33's with the 3.55 gears.
Old 01-09-2008, 12:42 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,363
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by jeepbogger4x4
i went from 32 at's to 33 boggers and my mpg sucks. i'm gonna regear sometime in the future. prolly to 3.73's cuz i don't want to go to 4.10's but you will be able to run 33's with the 3.55 gears.
if i may as why dont you want to go with 4.10's or even deeper?

-Kyle
Old 01-09-2008, 03:47 PM
  #6  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
dabeast727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: raleigh, nc
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

probobly for gas milealge
Old 01-10-2008, 08:11 AM
  #7  
Newbie
 
jeepbogger4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kyle Deidrick
if i may as why dont you want to go with 4.10's or even deeper?

-Kyle
i don't want to go any higher than 3.73's because this is mostly a daily driver. i take it off roading probably 20% of the time and i still need to be able to drive on the highway. i don't do any rock crawling which is why i bought the boggers to begin with. around here it's all mud and trail riding
Old 01-10-2008, 08:39 PM
  #8  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
dabeast727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: raleigh, nc
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

yea but 3.73s are a lil on the small side, your gas mileage will be better with 4.10s
Old 01-11-2008, 11:30 AM
  #9  
Newbie
 
jeepbogger4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i know they're a little small but i really don't want to go that far because the gears aren't that bad now, but it would give me a little better mpg
Old 01-12-2008, 03:10 PM
  #10  
CF Veteran
 
muddeprived's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: W-PA
Posts: 3,883
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by jeepbogger4x4
i know they're a little small but i really don't want to go that far because the gears aren't that bad now, but it would give me a little better mpg
If you have 3.55's currently, going with 3.73's is a waste of money cuz the change is VERY little. You will hardly notice the difference. Your main concern for gas mileage would be those boggers. they are nasty when it comes to gas mileage.
Old 01-13-2008, 07:25 PM
  #11  
Newbie
 
jeepbogger4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i know they're bad but they do the job in the mud. i was driving my buddy's k10 around the other day and he has 38" swampers with 3.42's. now that sux
Old 02-20-2008, 08:41 PM
  #12  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
dabeast727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: raleigh, nc
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

mines a manual so its got 3.07s i think. this is where im confused. if you got a 4.0 and an automatic trans and 3.55 gears, youd put in 4.10s to run 33s... everyone agrees on that... BUT if you got a 4.0 and a MANYUAL trans you have 3.07s, so to run 33s would you go up to 4.10s? seems like a huge reduction in gearing.
Old 02-20-2008, 09:22 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,363
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

yes you would go up to 4.10's

you could grab some stock axles from an auto and run 3.55's. However it is not set in stone by any means that you have to run 4.10 for 33's with an auto. Many people would run 4.56's with an auto for 33's because you can also run 35's in the future without much power loss.

-Kyle
Old 02-21-2008, 07:55 AM
  #14  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
dabeast727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: raleigh, nc
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Well i found an explorer 8.8 with 4.10s and a LSD and disk brakes set up for cherokee spring perches but i dont have the time or resources to swap in a new axle, its only $300 though which is cheaper than the $500-600 its going to cost to regear the back.
Old 02-21-2008, 10:44 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,363
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by dabeast727
Well i found an explorer 8.8 with 4.10s and a LSD and disk brakes set up for cherokee spring perches but i dont have the time or resources to swap in a new axle, its only $300 though which is cheaper than the $500-600 its going to cost to regear the back.
that is well worth it. the swap probably takes all of 2.5 hours, im sure you could find that amount of time within the next couple of weeks. just grab a buddy.

-Kyle

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 33s vs 32s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.