Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

swapping dana 30& 35 for dana 60's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2012, 09:35 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
xjbeadlocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by xjcherokee90
not going all out on them yet. just a thought right now. picked up a freshly rebuilt 60 rear for 40 bucks. guy was needin cash fast so i figured why not. been thinkin more ford 8.8 rear and waggy 44 front with no bigger than 37's
some d60's came with 30spline axle shafts so that 8.8 may have more splines. people go d60's because you can buy $$$ 35spline shafts for them. if you are not putting a ton on money into it then why run it? the 8.8 is close in WMS as stock but a d60 will be WAY to wide unless you shorten them
Old 01-13-2012, 10:20 PM
  #17  
CF Veteran
 
Jeepjunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: somewhere Gee oh Dee cant find me...
Posts: 4,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by xjcherokee90
not going all out on them yet. just a thought right now. picked up a freshly rebuilt 60 rear for 40 bucks. guy was needin cash fast so i figured why not. been thinkin more ford 8.8 rear and waggy 44 front with no bigger than 37's
ill take that D60 off ur hand for $50 lol
Old 01-13-2012, 11:09 PM
  #18  
Former Sponsor
 
ct67_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: meriden Ct
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by xjbeadlocks
some d60's came with 30spline axle shafts so that 8.8 may have more splines. people go d60's because you can buy $$$ 35spline shafts for them. if you are not putting a ton on money into it then why run it? the 8.8 is close in WMS as stock but a d60 will be WAY to wide unless you shorten them
huh? People go d60's because the shaft diameter is bigger, the ring gear diameter is bigger, the pinion is bigger, they have full float axles.
Are you saying a 8.8 is stronger than a 30 spline 60 because it has more splines?
Old 01-13-2012, 11:20 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
xjbeadlocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by ct67_72
huh? People go d60's because the shaft diameter is bigger, the ring gear diameter is bigger, the pinion is bigger, they have full float axles.
Are you saying a 8.8 is stronger than a 30 spline 60 because it has more splines?
no way in hell am I saying that. Just re-read it and it does sound like I'm saying that.

you forgot that the brakes are much bigger.
Old 01-14-2012, 08:25 AM
  #20  
Former Sponsor
 
ct67_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: meriden Ct
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

True, true. Damn forgot that. Lol ok, yeah that didn't sound good.
Old 01-14-2012, 07:29 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
xjcherokee90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: crossville,tn
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by xjbeadlocks
some d60's came with 30spline axle shafts so that 8.8 may have more splines. people go d60's because you can buy $$$ 35spline shafts for them. if you are not putting a ton on money into it then why run it? the 8.8 is close in WMS as stock but a d60 will be WAY to wide unless you shorten them
all depends what 8.8 rear you get. rangers had the 8.8 and they only had 27 spline. explorer had 31. as for anything else they came in im not sure what spline count is. so would everybody agree that a 44 front and 8.8 rear would be fine for 37's? i am no hard core wheeler but i do get into rough places. i knew the 60 was way big but like i said good deal and between me and my friend i know i could stuff them under it.
Old 01-14-2012, 11:01 PM
  #22  
Former Sponsor
 
ct67_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: meriden Ct
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

44 would be fine. But keep in mind its the same size u-joint as the 30. you can do upgraded shafts, which would solve that, and have the bigger ring gear that the 30. If your not going to be doing anything crazy it will be fine. Other wise, to me, for all the work involved you might as well swap the 60
Old 01-15-2012, 12:33 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
XSXJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Littleton
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 88
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0l
Default

I have a dana60 up front and a dana70 in the rear of my cherokee. it was a lot of work and takes quite a bit of fabrication skill, (fortunately I have friends with skills) - it is NOT a weekend swap, nor is it a bolt-in swap. There are a lot of things to take into consideration... clearances, axle width differences, driveshaft differences, etc. etc., etc. They can be built very strong to handle very large tires and lockers and extreme conditions, but unless you are planning on building an extreme off-road vehicle, (and if you are - then I HIGHLY recommend them), you are taking on a huge project that will cost you more money than you're anticipating - and you probably don't need to do it. There are many other axle swaps that would make sense and could be done fairly easily and inexpensively; again, it just depends on what you're looking to do with your cherokee when you're done. Take a look at some of my pics and you'll see there is a LOT of changes there... be sure that's what you want to do before you jump in.
Old 01-15-2012, 07:48 AM
  #24  
Former Sponsor
 
ct67_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: meriden Ct
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by XSXJ
I have a dana60 up front and a dana70 in the rear of my cherokee. it was a lot of work and takes quite a bit of fabrication skill, (fortunately I have friends with skills) - it is NOT a weekend swap, nor is it a bolt-in swap. There are a lot of things to take into consideration... clearances, axle width differences, driveshaft differences, etc. etc., etc. They can be built very strong to handle very large tires and lockers and extreme conditions, but unless you are planning on building an extreme off-road vehicle, (and if you are - then I HIGHLY recommend them), you are taking on a huge project that will cost you more money than you're anticipating - and you probably don't need to do it. There are many other axle swaps that would make sense and could be done fairly easily and inexpensively; again, it just depends on what you're looking to do with your cherokee when you're done. Take a look at some of my pics and you'll see there is a LOT of changes there... be sure that's what you want to do before you jump in.
Do you have a build thread?
Old 01-15-2012, 01:27 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
xjbeadlocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by xjcherokee90
all depends what 8.8 rear you get. rangers had the 8.8 and they only had 27 spline. explorer had 31. as for anything else they came in im not sure what spline count is. so would everybody agree that a 44 front and 8.8 rear would be fine for 37's? i am no hard core wheeler but i do get into rough places. i knew the 60 was way big but like i said good deal and between me and my friend i know i could stuff them under it.
who in there right mind would put a ranger 8.8 in there rig. my comment regarding 8.8 are for intelligent people that have done research on 8.8's and realized a explorer 8.8 with disc's and 31 are where its at.
Old 01-15-2012, 04:51 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
xjcherokee90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: crossville,tn
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by xjbeadlocks
who in there right mind would put a ranger 8.8 in there rig. my comment regarding 8.8 are for intelligent people that have done research on 8.8's and realized a explorer 8.8 with disc's and 31 are where its at.
yes they are! but i had a ranger before the jeep and never had any issues with it at all. 37's and locked. but i agree 100% the explorer 8.8 and disc is where its at for sure. just found one today for $100
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Eli Brda
Introductions
10
08-21-2019 12:58 PM
ATNC325
Axles/Tires/Wheels
0
09-23-2015 05:49 AM
codykrr
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
9
09-18-2015 01:27 PM
Ibanezz
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
24
09-10-2015 07:15 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: swapping dana 30& 35 for dana 60's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.