View Poll Results: Which exhaust setup should I go with?
Use the Flowmaster with dual outlets; have duals out back.



4
26.67%
Use the single outlet Flowmaster; just stay in the stock location.



11
73.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll
Need opinions from you guys!
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 16
From: Fauquier County, Virginia
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Hey everyone!
Just wanted some quick input about a delimma I've hit. As soon as the might wallet permits, I will be installing a 98-99 Vortec 5.7L V8 into my '91 XJ. I love the fact that the stock 330 lb ft of torque hits near 3k rpm (can you say awesome 4x4 ability?), and the stock 255 hp will be easily bumped up to about 300 hp with upgrades I have in mind. All while getting at least my stock 20 mpg, maybe slightly more considering the big 5000 pound Tahoes can squeeze 19 mpg highway sometimes. Anyways, here is my delimma.... Should I run duals out the back, or stick with a single outlet in the stock location?
I won't be running true duals, but what I was thinking was having the two 2.x inch collectors from the headers collect into a 3 inch pipe, run that pipe through a 3 inch High Flow cat, then to a 3 inch Flowmaster Super 44, but the Flowmaster I'd get would have the 2.5" dual outlets, which I would then run dual pipes out of. Otherwise, I'd use the same setup, just with one outlet.
Which direction do ya'll think I should go? I know the stock Vortec heads have an exhaust port that can be slightly choking, but at the same time, I don't want my rig to sound like crap or kill my exhaust velocity and cause all sorts of turbulance.
Side Note -- *** PLEASE don't pipe in on here and start rambling off on how "I can build a stroker for less" or "Use an LSx Engine". First off, I have NO DESIRE to deal with a stroker. I've heard and seen my fair share of their failures. As for the LSx engine, the LS may be superior to the Vortec L31 in terms of modern upgrades and power, however even the LSx can't argue with the Vortec L31's torque curve and peak. Plus, LSx engines around here are rarer than Elvis sitings. Thanks! ***
Just wanted some quick input about a delimma I've hit. As soon as the might wallet permits, I will be installing a 98-99 Vortec 5.7L V8 into my '91 XJ. I love the fact that the stock 330 lb ft of torque hits near 3k rpm (can you say awesome 4x4 ability?), and the stock 255 hp will be easily bumped up to about 300 hp with upgrades I have in mind. All while getting at least my stock 20 mpg, maybe slightly more considering the big 5000 pound Tahoes can squeeze 19 mpg highway sometimes. Anyways, here is my delimma.... Should I run duals out the back, or stick with a single outlet in the stock location?
I won't be running true duals, but what I was thinking was having the two 2.x inch collectors from the headers collect into a 3 inch pipe, run that pipe through a 3 inch High Flow cat, then to a 3 inch Flowmaster Super 44, but the Flowmaster I'd get would have the 2.5" dual outlets, which I would then run dual pipes out of. Otherwise, I'd use the same setup, just with one outlet.
Which direction do ya'll think I should go? I know the stock Vortec heads have an exhaust port that can be slightly choking, but at the same time, I don't want my rig to sound like crap or kill my exhaust velocity and cause all sorts of turbulance.
Side Note -- *** PLEASE don't pipe in on here and start rambling off on how "I can build a stroker for less" or "Use an LSx Engine". First off, I have NO DESIRE to deal with a stroker. I've heard and seen my fair share of their failures. As for the LSx engine, the LS may be superior to the Vortec L31 in terms of modern upgrades and power, however even the LSx can't argue with the Vortec L31's torque curve and peak. Plus, LSx engines around here are rarer than Elvis sitings. Thanks! ***
Since you're already going down to one pipe there's no reason to then go duals later other than looks. That and XJ's just look kinda funky with duals IMO. I say single pipe it.
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 16
From: Fauquier County, Virginia
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Lol I find it funny how the poll is tied. In all honesty, I guess my main goal behind the duals was opening the exhaust a bit. Do you all think that 3" is enough to let the L31 breathe? I mean, I've listened to stock 4.0's with dual outlets on a Flowmaster, and honestly I think my single outlet 2.5" flowmaster sounds louder... maybe it's pushing more flow in one direction rather than splitting it. But thats with an I6... Idk if duals out back for a V8 are of any benefit or have specific tone.
Trending Topics
CF Veteran
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Havana fl
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Single 3" you'd be suprised how good it sounds, I did a single 3" on my 1987 Crown Vic Wagon, along with a host of other things, and people always though it sounded great.
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 16
From: Fauquier County, Virginia
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
From: Leadville Co
Year: 2000
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.7
Originally Posted by The Blacksmith
duals belong on a v8, and should be "true" duals
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 16
From: Fauquier County, Virginia
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
http://www.novak-adapt.com/catalog/h...v8_headers.htm
CF Veteran
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
From: Havana fl
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
It flowed well enough for 400 horses out of a 302.... and it flows well enough for most OEM's to use it or 3 1/2" stock on a lot of vehicles including some Vette's, if you do duals use some type os crossover either an X or H-pipe or you are wasting your time.


