Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Long arm vs. the drop kit

Old Sep 10, 2013 | 09:42 PM
  #16  
bheath's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 1
From: JOCO
Year: 1999
Engine: 4.0 Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by BigBirdxj
Hey Guys! First time posting here. Followed this thread because i just started my project and i am always trying to learn as much as I can. Today it's mostly about a forum and how it works. In any case I am going with a long arm set up for two reasons. First it's super cool and second: since it will be a DD I am looking for a better ride quality on the road. The mathematics of a longer radius translates into a more dispersed impact of road undulations for a quieter and smother ride. Otherwise bump to strap length is all ya got, right?
Theoretically, sure. I've rode/drove both setups and can honestly say, the closer to stock, the better the ride/handling on road. Therefor, imo, 4.5" on CAD brackets drive/ride/handle better than 4.5" radius LA. Just my experience. But then again, the ride is mostly controlled by spring rates, shocks and shackle angles. CA's deal more with handling. Unless you're running 10" on stock brackets. Then it's going to ride like a lawn mower.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2013 | 11:06 PM
  #17  
holycaveman's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,643
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by BigBirdxj
Hey Guys! First time posting here. Followed this thread because i just started my project and i am always trying to learn as much as I can. Today it's mostly about a forum and how it works. In any case I am going with a long arm set up for two reasons. First it's super cool and second: since it will be a DD I am looking for a better ride quality on the road. The mathematics of a longer radius translates into a more dispersed impact of road undulations for a quieter and smother ride. Otherwise bump to strap length is all ya got, right?
Long arms are super cool. No getting around that.

But you better know what the heck you are doing if you are buying them for a better ride! Because although they may have more potential. Probably 5:1 I see a worse ride our of long arms. Quite a few hardly drivable.

In my opinion its because you are changing so much you have to seriously make an effort to get that nice ride back. In which it still will not match stock.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2013 | 11:27 PM
  #18  
mehoff_400's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 604
Likes: 1
From: puyallup
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

i think a good pair of shocks will go a long way with ride quality
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 02:06 AM
  #19  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by holycaveman
Not that long arms are not great, just for most(90%) they are not needed. Long arms are super cool. No getting around that.
I completely agree. not needed in the money vs. usefulness debate for most average wheelers

Originally Posted by holycaveman
But you better know what the heck you are doing if you are buying them for a better ride! Because although they may have more potential. Probably 5:1 I see a worse ride our of long arms. Quite a few hardly drivable.

In my opinion its because you are changing so much you have to seriously make an effort to get that nice ride back. In which it still will not match stock.
and here is where you are high as ****. I ran the hell out of my short arms and then upgraded to long arms. night and day difference. the stability on the freeway and cornering was SIGNIFICANTLY improved. I feel much safer now. body roll and poor drivability is directly related to white body shocks, crappy factory steering design, and or bad tires/alignment/caster

long arms are amazing. if you can get your hands on a decent used set or afford a new set, DO IT. they turned tooth rattling back jarring roads into a smooth ride and opened up a whole new world of wheeling for me. and my axle actually stays in the center of my wheel well where it belongs

utilize limit straps and bump stops people
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 02:12 AM
  #20  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

also. I hate the idea of drop brackets. skip that idea completely IMO. but hey whatever works for ya I guess..
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 02:16 AM
  #21  
bheath's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 1
From: JOCO
Year: 1999
Engine: 4.0 Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by Atmos
also. I hate the idea of drop brackets. skip that idea completely IMO. but hey whatever works for ya I guess..
Why do you hate drop brackets good sir? JW
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 02:21 AM
  #22  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by bheath
Why do you hate drop brackets good sir? JW
I spend a lot of time in the rocks. when backing off of something to choose a different line, I do not want to be hung up by some big bracket hanging off my frame. its personal preference. the drop bracket method may work great for some jeepers, I cant argue it I've never ran them . but while they might do something to fix the lower control arm angle, they still don't do anything for the upper arms. I cant imagine them being comparable to long arms in any way

IMO stick with cheap simple short arms or just go big. people are rarely content with the "in between" option

Last edited by Atmos; Sep 11, 2013 at 02:23 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 06:35 AM
  #23  
ohio95xj's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Dayton OH
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Drop brackets relocate both upper and lower control arm mounts. Also I am running the rc drop brackets(all brands are comparable), and flex lower arms I have only scraped them a few times(and never been hung up on them). I run some pretty nice trails and I love creekbeds with a lot of rocks and staircases. I'm running 35" tires 5.5" lift locked front and rear. Honestly everything that the drop brackets hit, long arms would as well. The clearence at the stock mount is about the same from drop brackets to long arms. I've measured. The ride quality is a great improvement over regular short arms. And I can unseat a coil enough to remove it. So any more flex would require coilovers. So honestly I don't see any point at all in going to long arms
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 06:36 AM
  #24  
bheath's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 1
From: JOCO
Year: 1999
Engine: 4.0 Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by Atmos

I spend a lot of time in the rocks. when backing off of something to choose a different line, I do not want to be hung up by some big bracket hanging off my frame. its personal preference. the drop bracket method may work great for some jeepers, I cant argue it I've never ran them . but while they might do something to fix the lower control arm angle, they still don't do anything for the upper arms. I cant imagine them being comparable to long arms in any way

IMO stick with cheap simple short arms or just go big. people are rarely content with the "in between" option
Wrong. They drop both upper and lower arms. They are comparable to LA's imo. I would rather run CAD brackets than a radius LA setup. I can understand from your pov though considering you've never ran them. For all the time i've spent on rocks, mine have never hung up, but i can see where they would under the right circumstance.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 06:39 AM
  #25  
bheath's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 1
From: JOCO
Year: 1999
Engine: 4.0 Inline 6
Default

Originally Posted by ohio95xj
Drop brackets relocate both upper and lower control arm mounts. Also I am running the rc drop brackets(all brands are comparable), and flex lower arms I have only scraped them a few times(and never been hung up on them). I run some pretty nice trails and I love creekbeds with a lot of rocks and staircases. I'm running 35" tires 5.5" lift locked front and rear. Honestly everything that the drop brackets hit, long arms would as well. The clearence at the stock mount is about the same from drop brackets to long arms. I've measured. The ride quality is a great improvement over regular short arms. And I can unseat a coil enough to remove it. So any more flex would require coilovers. So honestly I don't see any point at all in going to long arms
I can unseat coils also, lol. I just think people underestimate these brackets. I don't agree with the '...don't see any point at all in going to long arms.' though. A well built 3 link in the front doesn't compare in terms of flex. Road handling is a different story.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 07:01 AM
  #26  
ohio95xj's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Dayton OH
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by bheath

I can unseat coils also, lol. I just think people underestimate these brackets. I don't agree with the '...don't see any point at all in going to long arms.' though. A well built 3 link in the front doesn't compare in terms of flex. Road handling is a different story.
I didn't say I don't see any point in long arms, I would love to have a true 3 or 4 link. The point I was making is that as ell as my CAD setup works. I just can't justify spending all the cash. Now if money wasn't an option, I would be running a triangulated 4 link. Or a true 3 link
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 07:20 AM
  #27  
Lowrange2's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15,016
Likes: 11
From: +34° 25' 35.67", -81° 21' 12.04"
Year: 1993
Engine: 4.0
Default

I've run stock, I've run CADs, I've run LAs.

If you're going to run something other than stock just go ahead and save up for the LAs. You'll be buying and swapping to long arms in the future anyway. (I just know.)

I really didn't notice a huge difference in ride quality on the road between the CADs and LAs but noticed a pretty significant difference on the trail.

Also, if you're going to buy LAs... don't get a radius arm set-up. You want a 3 or 4-link. If you're going to buy radius arms anyway then I'd suggest you just buy CADs.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 09:05 AM
  #28  
SteveMongr's Avatar
Beach Bum
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,123
Likes: 22
From: Cape Hatteras, North Carolina
Year: 2000 WJ
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by bheath
No, springs lift an XJ... Lmao jk bud.
Actually he was correct. Long arms need over 3" lift. Some require 5.5" such as Full Traction.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 09:33 AM
  #29  
No4x4Yet's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 997
Likes: 1
From: Long Island NY
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by Bluebyu
I'm on stock and my xj flexes good.enough for me at 5"s of lift.

I guess drop brackets could help though. I just don't want to loose ground clearance
Yeah with all that hardcore offroading you do, you need every inche of clearance you can get.


Originally Posted by bheath
Originally Posted by BigBirdxj
Hey Guys! First time posting here. Followed this thread because i just started my project and i am always trying to learn as much as I can. Today it's mostly about a forum and how it works. In any case I am going with a long arm set up for two reasons. First it's super cool and second: since it will be a DD I am looking for a better ride quality on the road. The mathematics of a longer radius translates into a more dispersed impact of road undulations for a quieter and smother ride. Otherwise bump to strap length is all ya got, right?
Theoretically, sure. I've rode/drove both setups and can honestly say, the closer to stock, the better the ride/handling on road. Therefor, imo, 4.5" on CAD brackets drive/ride/handle better than 4.5" radius LA. Just my experience. But then again, the ride is mostly controlled by spring rates, shocks and shackle angles. CA's deal more with handling. Unless you're running 10" on stock brackets. Then it's going to ride like a lawn mower.
I've heard just the opposite Bheath. The theory and physics dont lie, a longer arm transmits less force into the body and more into the springs.

I installed the CAD on my jeep and they made a big difference. With the stock control locations the arms were around a 30-40 degree angle. This means a portion of the force goes right up the arm and into the body while the rest goes to the spring. The CAD put the arms near parallel to the ground so nearly 100% of the force goes right into the springs and almost nothing up the arm. I noticed pretty substantial difference in ride comfort/quality with the CAD in.

Originally Posted by Atmos
I spend a lot of time in the rocks. when backing off of something to choose a different line, I do not want to be hung up by some big bracket hanging off my frame. its personal preference. the drop bracket method may work great for some jeepers, I cant argue it I've never ran them . but while they might do something to fix the lower control arm angle, they still don't do anything for the upper arms. I cant imagine them being comparable to long arms in any way

IMO stick with cheap simple short arms or just go big. people are rarely content with the "in between" option
They could cause issues but you would need to be goin up stop STEEP, SHARP rocks for it to interfere. The brackets drop and go back around 2 inches, realistically the chance of having a rock hit that high before the tire hits and starts riding up are pretty slim.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2013 | 10:37 AM
  #30  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by bheath
Wrong. They drop both upper and lower arms. They are comparable to LA's imo. I would rather run CAD brackets than a radius LA setup. I can understand from your pov though considering you've never ran them. For all the time i've spent on rocks, mine have never hung up, but i can see where they would under the right circumstance.
no freakin way! I never did notice that but you're right. that's what you get for never actually reading the product description. I was just looking at the RC ones and I have dents in my frame where those brackets would go

well you have me convinced that they probably work fine. but in my mind they'll always be in the same category as the hack n tap SYE and wheel spacers, etc. it's not the product itself, just the idea of it
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 PM.