Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lift vs articulation arguement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2012 | 07:40 PM
  #1  
je_cherosport's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Issaquah, WA
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0l
Default Lift vs articulation arguement

Alright guys, my friend and I are having a debate over articulation and how it is affected by the size of your lift/coil spring. On the front of a Cherokee, does the coil spring height affect articulation given the same LCA's, and the correct shock/swaybar combo?
example: lets say we are running the EXACT same Long-arm set-up on 2 cherokees. The cars have the same shocks, tire/wheels, and sway disconnects. One car has 6.5" coils and one has 8" coils. will the 8" lift jeep articulate more? if so, will it even be worthwhile?

He thinks money spent is going high, I think money spent is modest lift and lockers. Given the same money being used in either case.

I know this is a kind of rediculous arguement, but I cant find enough information on this to get a concrete awnser.

thanks!
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 07:51 PM
  #2  
N20jeep's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,685
Likes: 6
From: Jacksonville, FL
Year: 92
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Lift height does not equal articulation
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 07:54 PM
  #3  
J0E13's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Mint Hill
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Straight Six!
Default

Originally Posted by je_cherosport
The cars have the same shocks, tire/wheels, and sway disconnects. One car has 6.5" coils and one has 8" coils.
Ah I see what might make the difference...is CARS tend to not get lifted but Jeep CHEROKEES do
Lol

Any ways remember in a VERY simple put way lift is to get bigger tires. Bigger tires is to get your axle off the ground. So a in sure others will say, its how well you can get a good balance between height and tires. there's a guy here with a amazing Jeep cherokee that is all about lcog. Can he articulate and stuff his tiremore than a eight inch suspension, maybe. But look at buggies, they're not very high and can squat and articulate like crazy. My two cents. I'm sure others can input with better info
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #4  
Gatchmo5710's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 3
From: st.george utah
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: l6 4.0
Default

Yes they will articulate the same amount but usable articulation won't be the same. If the coil isnt even touching the vehicle it doesn't really help much with traction. I think 6.5 inches is still too tall. 5 is about right.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 08:04 PM
  #5  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

Side not, bigger tires are also used to make obstacles smaller.

A 31" tire crawling over a 25" ledge will be more of a challenge than a 44" tire crawling over the same 25" ledge.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 08:22 PM
  #6  
zr2toxj's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
From: Leeds, Maine
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

You also have to consider what you are doing with the center of gravity, you may not be able to flex it out for fear of flopping with an 8" lift.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 11:33 PM
  #7  
Gorillaxj's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

I am told all the time I have to much flex and I am at 5.5" of lift on 35's... its all droop.

you could lift a vehicle 18 inches and only get 3-5" of flex, or lower a vehicle, and get 20 inches of flex. all depends on the limiting factor of the suspension. Lift height has really NOTHING to do with flex at all. it comes down to the shocks, brake lines, steering, control arms, geometry, ect. What binds first is whats going to limit your down/up travel.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 11:44 PM
  #8  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

are long arms the best bang-for-buck upgrade to get better articulation and effective flex?
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 11:53 PM
  #9  
Daltonamorph's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, Texas
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

You can get pretty good flex out of adjustable short arms with drop brackets, but a well set up mid or long arm suspension will outflex it anyday. The limiting factor between the two is normally shock length. You can only squeeze so long a shock on a cherokee. I have 12s in front and 14s out back, and the 12s are still my limiting factor up front.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 11:59 PM
  #10  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

if you had a re-do what front/rear length would you have gotten.
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 12:19 AM
  #11  
1tonxj's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 1
From: Colorado...BAILEY,CO...BYATCH !
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

You don't need lift to flex , But you will need it on an XJ if you want up-travel , and ultra low lifts with big tires are all or mostly droop ,which will suck if wanting do go fast whopps type wheeling ...An XJ with a 4 inch lift an 38's will flex big time if the shocks are long enough and the coils trapped ,but that rig will not be friendly if trying to go fast on big bumps and jumps since it will have no room for compression .
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 07:40 AM
  #12  
TheJerm's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 4
From: Flint/Asheville
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

I see that argument as big gay truck vs a usable trail beater, but its all really about the use of the vehicle. Pure mudding, yea you want it sky high. For crawling and trail riding, you want it alittle lower to reduce your center of gravity. Flex is all about how many $100 bills you rub your suspension with, it can go both ways. And yes shocks are always the limiting factor in flex, hence why you see people cut holes in their floors and hoods to put longer shocks in.
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 08:00 AM
  #13  
huntingman2706217's Avatar
MJ>XJ
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 17,836
Likes: 7
From: Griffin, G.A.
Year: 1990
Model: Comanche
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Low cog... 4.5in lift... 40's but I got a deal on them... I could fit 46's easily... Super duty axles which are wide as crap (forget wtw now)... Mines not going to be so much about up travel but thats fine because I got low cog and dont really need to stuff all to much...
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 08:03 AM
  #14  
Tom95YJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 3
From: SLC, Utah
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by Gee oh Dee
Side not, bigger tires are also used to make obstacles smaller.

A 31" tire crawling over a 25" ledge will be more of a challenge than a 44" tire crawling over the same 25" ledge.
Yea but climbing a 25" ledge with a 31" tire is so much more fun than it would be with a 44" tire
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 08:05 AM
  #15  
huntingman2706217's Avatar
MJ>XJ
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 17,836
Likes: 7
From: Griffin, G.A.
Year: 1990
Model: Comanche
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

And thats KTM's low cog thread by the way... And I know many have seen these but heres mine and its stance...

Lift vs articulation arguement-forumrunner_20120512_090334.jpg



Lift vs articulation arguement-forumrunner_20120512_090357.jpg



Lift vs articulation arguement-forumrunner_20120512_090433.jpg



Lift vs articulation arguement-forumrunner_20120512_090323.jpg
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.