Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hesco Waterpump - Horsepower gain bogus?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2014, 09:04 PM
  #1  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
PumpinIron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default Hesco Waterpump - Horsepower gain bogus?

I'm going to overhaul my cooling system just because it's past due. In the process of doing so I figured why not add a high flow water pump. Well, I stumbled upon the Hesco pump and while it does indeed look nice, I read this bit on their website and laughed my *** off...
Another First! Provides 10 to 20% more cooling efficiency than the stock water pump. We have replaced the stock stamped steel 5-vane impeller with an 8-vane billet aluminum impeller to achieve this goal. The impeller is larger than the stock and lessens the cavitations of the coolant to create a more positive flow in the space between the impeller and the #1 cylinder. The dyno showed an additional bonus of 6 hp. and 2ft/lbs. of torque gain we weren't expecting. The horsepower gain comes from the impeller slicing through the coolant instead of paddling the coolant. Individual gains may very depending on what accessories are already in place and engine condition. Either way it is a worthy addition to any Jeep engine whether it's a street driver or an off-road rock crawler.
You can see it here.

Okay, so I'm no expert on this matter but this seems laughable at best. More horsepower / torque because the water pump is now "slicing through the coolant"!?

You guys tell me... Do you think this is bogus or is there actually some merit to it?
Old 08-15-2014, 10:05 PM
  #2  
CF Veteran
 
Bustedback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oroville, CA
Posts: 12,367
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Year: 1995
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 with all of the noise and clatter
Default

There is no regulation for those types of claims, so I will call shenanigans on their claim. Go to any flea market and you will find 1000 watt amps the size of a cigarette pack. Again, no regulation so the manufacture can say anything they want. That water pump may offer better cooling, but not much else.
Old 08-15-2014, 10:08 PM
  #3  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
PumpinIron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

That's what I figured... Sounds like snake oil to me.

I just find it laughable that people make these sort of claims. I find it even more laughable that people buy products like this under the assumption they will indeed actually gain horsepower.

Sheesh...
Old 08-15-2014, 11:29 PM
  #4  
CF Veteran
 
XJlimitedx99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Andover, VT
Posts: 2,970
Received 224 Likes on 174 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Default

Sounds bogus to me, although I could see how you could get very marginal gains from creating a pump with less "drag." Kinda like how an electric fan is more beneficial than a mechanical one. Just thinking hypothetically.
Old 08-15-2014, 11:29 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Jrozar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I think they are trying to say it moves the coolant much faster (paddling verse slicing may be a bad choice of words ) producing more cooling which in turn can create more horsepower. They didn't mention if it were at the crank or rear wheels or even what the test engine was..

In high horsepower vehicles I know that efficient cooling does produce horse power gains. But again there was no reference to what engine was being used for the testing imagine a 1% gain in hp in a 600 hp engine is 6
Old 08-16-2014, 09:20 AM
  #6  
CF Veteran
 
CobraMarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Default

Get a Flowcooler for less $. They use a nice CNC piece.

As for Hesco's claims, I am sure he had tests on a dyno to show difference, OK maybe at 5000 rpm, everywhere else not noticable.
Old 08-16-2014, 10:01 AM
  #7  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
PumpinIron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by CobraMarty
Get a Flowcooler for less $. They use a nice CNC piece.

As for Hesco's claims, I am sure he had tests on a dyno to show difference, OK maybe at 5000 rpm, everywhere else not noticable.
The FlowKoolers are notorious for breaking. Apparently they've riveted a metal plate on the end of the impellar and the rivets are very prone to coming out after X amount of miles which can end in catastrophe.
Old 08-16-2014, 10:51 AM
  #8  
CF Veteran
 
CobraMarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: PA KOTUFU!
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Year: 1998
Engine: 4.0L 162,000
Default

Originally Posted by PumpinIron
The FlowKoolers are notorious for breaking. Apparently they've riveted a metal plate on the end of the impellar and the rivets are very prone to coming out after X amount of miles which can end in catastrophe.
That's old news. Now they have CNC billet inpeller.

http://www.flowkoolerwaterpumps.com/info/mirakool.html
Old 08-16-2014, 01:01 PM
  #9  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
PumpinIron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by CobraMarty
That's old news. Now they have CNC billet inpeller.

http://www.flowkoolerwaterpumps.com/info/mirakool.html
News to me, I didn't even realize!

Good news though, I'll be sure to get one now.
Old 08-16-2014, 02:01 PM
  #10  
CF Veteran
 
Fred/N0AZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Monett, MO.
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

I save HP on my race motor water pumps.......use electric only way I found.
Old 08-16-2014, 02:18 PM
  #11  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
PumpinIron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Fred/N0AZZ
I save HP on my race motor water pumps.......use electric only way I found.
An electric water pump I could see saving some horsepower. I don't think that's a practical application for street use, though I could be wrong.
Old 08-16-2014, 03:11 PM
  #12  
CF Veteran
 
Fred/N0AZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Monett, MO.
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by PumpinIron
An electric water pump I could see saving some horsepower. I don't think that's a practical application for street use, though I could be wrong.
I do run one on the street but its in a sleeper wagon now SBC (Dart block & Heads) FAST F.I., Twin Turbo Air to water inter-cooled.

Was just joking about one for the 4.0.
Old 08-16-2014, 03:23 PM
  #13  
Seasoned Member
Thread Starter
 
PumpinIron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 2001
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Fred/N0AZZ
I do run one on the street but its in a sleeper wagon now SBC (Dart block & Heads) FAST F.I., Twin Turbo Air to water inter-cooled.

Was just joking about one for the 4.0.
I figured as much, LOL.

I'll end up putting one of those on my 69' Camaro SS when I put the new motor in.
Old 08-16-2014, 04:13 PM
  #14  
CF Veteran
 
Firestorm500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,734
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Year: 2015, 2012
Model: Grand Cherokee (WK2)
Engine: 3.6L
Default

You don't want faster flow in a stock engine. The coolant has to stay in the block, then the radiator, for a certain amount of time in order for proper and sufficient heat transfer to take place.
Old 08-16-2014, 04:43 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Jrozar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Mine just arrived today along with the high flow thermostat housing.

I just think its just cooler having it...hopefully I will have a loss of 6 horsepower and an overheating issue. I enjoy complications in my life...

Oh I have a 4.0 in a YJ with a Flowkooler water pump, high flow 180 stat, hi flow thermostat housing and a 3 core aluminum radiator.

I live in Las Vegas where its stays pretty cool year round... and I noticed a difference in it taking longer to get to operating temperature and I run a few degrees cooler on the highway









Quick Reply: Hesco Waterpump - Horsepower gain bogus?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.