Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

gm 350 vs I6 stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2011, 07:01 PM
  #16  
CF Veteran
 
Irongrave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florence SC
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 1996
Engine: 4.0
Default

stock gears and i assume stock axles with 37s. good luck with that
Old 03-29-2011, 09:03 PM
  #17  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
rowdy4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

I swapped out stock axle before i even put the lift on with a Dana 44. its the stock gears in that, not 100% sure what they are
Old 03-29-2011, 09:33 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
SuperGlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Forest Grove, OR
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Inline 6, 4.ol
Default

Originally Posted by Rock Toy
My K5 350 was injected, wasn't gay and definitely wasn't uber anything. About 370-380 hp, and 415-425 ft. lbs. That is my Blazer in my profile on the Z corners on the Moab Rim trail.
For reliable power the sbc V8 is the way to go.
As stated before, it really depends on what you get it out of. But if you are even going to bother may as well get a TPI 350 from a 90's camaro in my opinion. And as for stock, i simply think the 4.0 is a more reliable motor and feels much more torqy to me then a 350, but I also havnt driven a cherokee with a 350, and a blazer obviously weighs a lot more then a cherokee
Old 03-29-2011, 09:43 PM
  #19  
Honorary Moderator
 
96_xj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Gilbert AZ/Las Cruces NM
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 upgraded
Default

Simple question. did you re gear. the stock motor makes PLENTY of power but if you did not regear you wont utilize any of it....

and a stroker will be easier and cheaper to do since you dont have all the custom fab work, wiring, and new tranny to buy
Old 03-29-2011, 09:58 PM
  #20  
Member
 
FOXxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 94
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Stroked - 4.7
Default

I like my stroker - tons of torque, fraction of the cost, and reliable.
Old 03-29-2011, 10:21 PM
  #21  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
rowdy4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
Default

Well i have the peugot manual transmission which can be used with a 350. as for the fab work im not really worried about that. one of the few things i know well
Old 03-30-2011, 01:35 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
SuperGlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Forest Grove, OR
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Inline 6, 4.ol
Default

a puegot with a 350........ Good luck with that, they can hardly handle the 4.0
Old 03-30-2011, 03:31 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
neeland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Year: 98
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

X2 my yj had a puegot an I'm pretty sure its the worst transmission ever built in history.
Old 03-30-2011, 05:23 AM
  #24  
Member
 
89stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: yakima, wa
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 89
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.7
Default

Originally Posted by neeland
X2 my yj had a puegot an I'm pretty sure its the worst transmission ever built in history.
Lmao! If you want transmission pieces in Your leg ditch That. And my 180 HP tbi 350 would pop those paper weights.

Also I love my 4.7 stroker. With my Cam its lopey. Also did a tri y header flat tops milled the head. P and p and Shelby gt500 injectors. No k5 can keep up with me.
Old 03-30-2011, 10:06 AM
  #25  
CF Veteran
 
Rock Toy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cove, OR
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by SuperGlue
As stated before, it really depends on what you get it out of. But if you are even going to bother may as well get a TPI 350 from a 90's camaro in my opinion. And as for stock, i simply think the 4.0 is a more reliable motor and feels much more torqy to me then a 350, but I also havnt driven a cherokee with a 350, and a blazer obviously weighs a lot more then a cherokee
No, statement before was that a K5 didn't have injection, some do, some don't. As for which sbc, I went with what I had, didn't want to spend the money on upgrading the electronics, a 383 short block equaled inexpensive and reliable power. As for reliability the sbc is maybe the most reliable engine ever built. I'm not saying that the 4.0 isn't a good engine, but I think the sbc will make more power, more reliably than the I6 4.0 engine.
Old 03-30-2011, 10:15 AM
  #26  
Member
 
zackxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Little Mountain, SC
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Honestly both a great choices, but your going to have way more work to do if you try to run the v8. just look into having your i6 overhauled, and for god sakes, regear.
Old 03-30-2011, 10:20 AM
  #27  
Newbie
 
Tlp95xj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Renfrew PA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 ho
Default

U want reliability......95 cherokee with a 4.0 ho.....309450 miles on it! Have only had to replace water pump, regular tune ups, doesn't burn or leak oil and i could go out in the street right now and lay a posi patch halfway up my road. Thats RELIABLE! I am a chevy man but have yet to see any sbc with that many miles on it run that good! Gear ur jeep and do some mods to ur motor, u will be much happier!
Old 03-30-2011, 10:21 AM
  #28  
CF Veteran
 
captainofiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 1991
Engine: 4.0 I-6 H.O.
Default

Originally Posted by zackxj
Honestly both a great choices, but your going to have way more work to do if you try to run the v8. just look into having your i6 overhauled, and for god sakes, regear.
I dont think it would be so much work over rebuilding the i-6

engine mounts, transmission adapter

BUT since the OP already said that he has the peugot tranny, that means he would have to ditch that before the sbc swap which would up the price/time considerably

http://www.novak-adapt.com/catalog/kit_gmax15.htm
Old 03-30-2011, 10:25 AM
  #29  
Member
 
zackxj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Little Mountain, SC
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by captainofiron
I dont think it would be so much work over rebuilding the i-6

engine mounts, transmission adapter

BUT since the OP already said that he has the peugot tranny, that means he would have to ditch that before the sbc swap which would up the price/time considerably

http://www.novak-adapt.com/catalog/kit_gmax15.htm
bingo, also once you replace the tranny what about the transfer case? would that hold up to the power of a v8 without having to be replaced?
Old 03-30-2011, 10:30 AM
  #30  
CF Veteran
 
captainofiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Year: 1991
Engine: 4.0 I-6 H.O.
Default

Originally Posted by zackxj
bingo, also once you replace the tranny what about the transfer case? would that hold up to the power of a v8 without having to be replaced?
most of the TCs in the XJ are more than capable of handling an sbc


Quick Reply: gm 350 vs I6 stroker



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.