gm 350 vs I6 stroker
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 504
Likes: 3
From: Forest Grove, OR
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Inline 6, 4.ol
As stated before, it really depends on what you get it out of. But if you are even going to bother may as well get a TPI 350 from a 90's camaro in my opinion. And as for stock, i simply think the 4.0 is a more reliable motor and feels much more torqy to me then a 350, but I also havnt driven a cherokee with a 350, and a blazer obviously weighs a lot more then a cherokee
Honorary Moderator
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,135
Likes: 16
From: Gilbert AZ/Las Cruces NM
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 upgraded
Simple question. did you re gear. the stock motor makes PLENTY of power but if you did not regear you wont utilize any of it....
and a stroker will be easier and cheaper to do since you dont have all the custom fab work, wiring, and new tranny to buy
and a stroker will be easier and cheaper to do since you dont have all the custom fab work, wiring, and new tranny to buy
Originally Posted by neeland
X2 my yj had a puegot an I'm pretty sure its the worst transmission ever built in history.
Also I love my 4.7 stroker. With my Cam its lopey. Also did a tri y header flat tops milled the head. P and p and Shelby gt500 injectors. No k5 can keep up with me.
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 3
From: Cove, OR
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
As stated before, it really depends on what you get it out of. But if you are even going to bother may as well get a TPI 350 from a 90's camaro in my opinion. And as for stock, i simply think the 4.0 is a more reliable motor and feels much more torqy to me then a 350, but I also havnt driven a cherokee with a 350, and a blazer obviously weighs a lot more then a cherokee
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Little Mountain, SC
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Honestly both a great choices, but your going to have way more work to do if you try to run the v8. just look into having your i6 overhauled, and for god sakes, regear.
U want reliability......95 cherokee with a 4.0 ho.....309450 miles on it! Have only had to replace water pump, regular tune ups, doesn't burn or leak oil and i could go out in the street right now and lay a posi patch halfway up my road. Thats RELIABLE! I am a chevy man but have yet to see any sbc with that many miles on it run that good! Gear ur jeep and do some mods to ur motor, u will be much happier!
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 3
From: Austin, Texas
Year: 1991
Engine: 4.0 I-6 H.O.
engine mounts, transmission adapter
BUT since the OP already said that he has the peugot tranny, that means he would have to ditch that before the sbc swap which would up the price/time considerably
http://www.novak-adapt.com/catalog/kit_gmax15.htm
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Little Mountain, SC
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I dont think it would be so much work over rebuilding the i-6
engine mounts, transmission adapter
BUT since the OP already said that he has the peugot tranny, that means he would have to ditch that before the sbc swap which would up the price/time considerably
http://www.novak-adapt.com/catalog/kit_gmax15.htm
engine mounts, transmission adapter
BUT since the OP already said that he has the peugot tranny, that means he would have to ditch that before the sbc swap which would up the price/time considerably
http://www.novak-adapt.com/catalog/kit_gmax15.htm
CF Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 3
From: Austin, Texas
Year: 1991
Engine: 4.0 I-6 H.O.


