Modified XJ Cherokee Tech XJ (84-01)
All modified tech questions. If it modifies your XJ beyond stock parts ask it here.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Beefing up The 4.0L I6 the right way

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 06:59 AM
  #16  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by Gary Briggs
I've read about a million threads on more power from the 4.0litre, as far as I can tell the juice isn't worth the squeeze. They never yield the power gains per dollar invested like a V8. I'd swap in a V8 or a 4bt cummins before I tried to hotrod the 4.0l
Trufax

Originally Posted by andrewmp6
I don't see how a snorkel will be a choke point,It should help its sucking up cooler air vs the hot under hood air.
ARB Safari snorkle goes down to like a 2.5" diameter. To remain free-flowing, especially at such length, 4" or more is appropriate.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 09:51 AM
  #17  
Gary Briggs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 842
Likes: 6
From: Escalon, Ca
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4litre
Default

Originally Posted by salad
ARB Safari snorkle goes down to like a 2.5" diameter. To remain free-flowing, especially at such length, 4" or more is appropriate.
At hwy speeds wouldn't there be a forced air induction effect? Might neutralize those choking elbows a some degree. Either way the ARB snorkel is hideous.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 10:11 AM
  #18  
XJlimitedx99's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 357
From: Andover, VT
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Default

I've always been more of a fan of the cowl intakes because they appear to flow better than a conventional snorkel.

You won't get big numbers out of this engine, BUT you can smooth it out a bit and maybe squeeze a couple mpg out of it.

This is what I would do if I were gunna spend the money:

-spectre cowl intake
-62mm butterfly valve
-injectors
-headers and a 2.25" high flow exhaust

I'm not sure about the intake. I've never researched it cause I have a 99.

Personally, I would stick with 2.25" exhaust because IMO I think it's better to keep the exhaust velocity up. The 2.5" will sound mean though. Some people will bash on headers because they're so expensive for little gain. I think it's worth it just to say you have headers

As far as computers or ignition goes, it all seems to be a gimmick with these motors. It would be nice to have an aftermarket ignition so you could gap your plugs bigger, but I don't know of any.

Short of building a stroker motor, there isn't much meat left on the bone for our 4.0s. This setup could easily run you upwards of $1,000 for maybe 20hp.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 10:23 AM
  #19  
denverd1's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 402
Likes: 2
From: East Texas
Year: 98
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

One word: regear.

I realize you've already done 3.07 to 3.55, but money would be better spent IMO on putting more torque to the ground through deeper gearing.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 10:41 AM
  #20  
XJlimitedx99's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 357
From: Andover, VT
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Default

Originally Posted by denverd1
One word: regear. I realize you've already done 3.07 to 3.55, but money would be better spent IMO on putting more torque to the ground through deeper gearing.
I disagree with this for only 31s. If he was going 33s or 35s I would agree all day but I think it would be too much gearing to go any deeper on 31s
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 10:44 AM
  #21  
denverd1's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 402
Likes: 2
From: East Texas
Year: 98
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by XJlimitedx99
I disagree with this for only 31s. If he was going 33s or 35s I would agree all day but I think it would be too much gearing to go any deeper on 31s
If we could cam, intake and flow these engines there would be no question. you could make significantly more ponies with a few mods and stay under a $1k. deeper gears would let PO move to bigger tires at some point and still create "more power" with 31's.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 10:50 AM
  #22  
Gary Briggs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 842
Likes: 6
From: Escalon, Ca
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4litre
Default

$1000 for a few ponies seems really silly to me.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 11:51 AM
  #23  
XJlimitedx99's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 357
From: Andover, VT
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Default

I could agree with this. Regearing also isn't cheap either, but I could see it being a more worthy investment down the road.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 12:07 PM
  #24  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by Gary Briggs
At hwy speeds wouldn't there be a forced air induction effect? Might neutralize those choking elbows a some degree. Either way the ARB snorkel is hideous.
Sure, at highway speeds. While you do get the cooler air it's still a lot more restrictive than a stock intake - so not that great at low speeds unless the air under the hood is REALLY hot. A cowl intake has the same induction effect without the restriction.

Originally Posted by denverd1
One word: regear.

I realize you've already done 3.07 to 3.55, but money would be better spent IMO on putting more torque to the ground through deeper gearing.
To what end? Any gears worth spending money on (as in, 4.56:1 or deeper) are going to be way too deep to use with 31" tires in any daily driver situation. Yes you get "MOAR POWAR" - however you've decided to quantify that - but 3000 RPM on the highway is not fun.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 06:52 PM
  #25  
Turbo X_J's Avatar
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,567
Likes: 20
From: ☼ Blackhole Sun
Year: My Jeep is a GMC
Default

Originally Posted by Hexaphobia
I have a 1991 cherokee 4.0L I6 5speed with a 2.5" lift on 31's, And I have taken it from jeep junker to bad *** trail stomper... but other than a full overhaul I have yet to upgrade the engine.
Originally Posted by Hexaphobia
As I said... Have done overhaul. only has 140k on it but did it anyways when i bought it.
Originally Posted by CrawdadSlim
He did a "full overhaul".
"Didn't", "did", "only" 140,000 miles = sorry, it's too circular for me, I'm un-subbed...
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 10:45 PM
  #26  
Metmknice's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 2
From: Hell, CA
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

Maybe MLS head gasket, head work, port match 99+ intake, aftermarket header. etc.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 11:55 PM
  #27  
Hexaphobia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

I think I will just stick with injector swap and headers. Everything ells sounds like alot of work and $ for almost no return, I have other places I can spend that money. Thank you all for your input.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 08:18 PM
  #28  
md21722's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 672
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Year: 2001, 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

I believe cold air intake and free flowing muffler are the two most cost effective ways to get another few HP out of the 4.0L. If that's not good enough, build a stroker.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nkyshaolin
Cherokee Chat
28
Oct 1, 2015 04:48 PM
CobraMarty
Modified XJ Cherokee Tech
0
Oct 1, 2015 08:34 AM
spjohnson1031
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
17
Sep 23, 2015 02:05 PM
Cleetus
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
20
Sep 22, 2015 09:42 AM
Cleetus
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
1
Sep 16, 2015 06:33 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.