Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Would you buy a 2013 XJ today ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 08:53 AM
  #1  
DieselDaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa,Oklahoma
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default Would you buy a 2013 XJ today ???

'01, been a long time now though it seems like yesterday... If the powers that be decided to bring the old XJ back to the future with a few tweaks here and there with the body and interior but with the same ol trusty 4.0... I think the Commander comes close to what I'm looking for...

Would you buy one??
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 08:58 AM
  #2  
andrewmp6's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 17
From: Louisville,KY
Model: Cherokee
Default

If they would bring back the fsj cherokee or j10 i would buy one of those in a heart beat.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 09:00 AM
  #3  
95Cherokee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 3
From: Houston Tx.
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Commanders get decent comments on MSN Auto customer reviews, horrendous gas mileage though.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 09:01 AM
  #4  
blakexcore's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: McDonough, GA
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by DieselDaze
'01, been a long time now though it seems like yesterday... If the powers that be decided to bring the old XJ back to the future with a few tweaks here and there with the body and interior but with the same ol trusty 4.0... I think the Commander comes close to what I'm looking for...

Would you buy one??

If it had solid axles and looked relatively the same, then maybe. It'd have to be cheap though (sub-$20k).
I think the reason that XJ's are so popular is because they're cheap, simple, capable, easy to work on, and some might consider them "disposable". A new one probably wouldnt sell very well in all honesty.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 09:06 AM
  #5  
rmoore1031's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 2
From: Bentonville, AR
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6 4.0
Default

When the XJ was in production, gas was cheap. As much as I love the reliability of the 4.0, it wouldn't make economic sense for it to be brought back. Then there is the whole emissions problem and safety standards. If it weren't for these issues the XJ and TJ would probably still be in production.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 09:07 AM
  #6  
DieselDaze's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa,Oklahoma
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

they made millions of these things I don't see why it would make them so hard to sell, grand cherokee seems to be doing okay..

I'm thinking leave a more open format to the vehicle for the DIY'er, expeditionist's, survivalist, doomsdayers, weekend warriors could tweak them to fit their liking...

bare bones package is what I'm after, and something with a stick.....
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 09:17 AM
  #7  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Probably, if it had a diesel. I don't see how anybody could justify purchasing a gasoline engine larger than about 3L these days.

Then again a car from the south without any rust is close enough to "new" for me! The unibody's the only non-replaceable part.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 09:27 AM
  #8  
PocketsEmpty's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 6
From: York, PA
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

If they stuck true to their roots, it would be nice, but the fact is I would never pay 30,000 for a brand new vehicle. It would have to have solid axles, standard T-case without any electronic shifting bull****, and the less plastic the better. Bedlined floors from the factory would be a nice option. I would also think a newly improved 4.0 would be a great option. People would buy it. Also, NO PLASTIC HEADLIGHT HOUSINGS. That would be a dealbreaker for me. Any sort of stupid-looking aerodynamics. The Commander sucks, I wouldn't even compare it....at least it has a solid rear axle though...but to go to the mall with.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 09:47 AM
  #9  
XJEvo's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 169
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Default

I would probably buy my 99 XJ brand new again today but for no more than ~$22K and it would have to have a 4cyl diesel with a 6 speed manual.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 10:13 AM
  #10  
93XJLI's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 11
From: LI, NY
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, bolt ons for days...
Default

absolutely not, youd have to be an idiot to buy one.

though if they made something that looked similar, with a more modern powertrain and a solid rear axle... id think about it. there really is no reason to, the JK is a great truck.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 10:14 AM
  #11  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

no. never. I prefer as few electronics as possible. so unless it comes with manual windows and a V8, I aint interested
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 10:56 AM
  #12  
PocketsEmpty's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 6
From: York, PA
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Atmos
no. never. I prefer as few electronics as possible. so unless it comes with manual windows and a V8, I aint interested
x2. All the electronics and plastic in cars nowadays is maddening. I'm convinced that every vehicle I'll ever own has already been produced.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 02:33 PM
  #13  
s346k's Avatar
CF Veteran
Premium Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 18
From: central IN
Year: 1997
Engine: 4.0
Default

short answer no.

unless it came with a gm lsx engine, solid axles, and a t/trXX trans.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 02:53 PM
  #14  
scottmphoto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 957
Likes: 2
From: Russellville, Arkansas
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I-6
Default

I don't even like the look of the new ones. They'd have to bring back the older body style, have a solid front axle, have an actual transfer case, bring back our beloved 4.0 and AW4 transmission.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2013 | 04:57 PM
  #15  
rackem's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 165
Likes: 1
Model: Cherokee
Default

i would if they did it right.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 AM.