Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

turbo ran off a bat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 10:24 PM
  #106  
MVDCXJ's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville, MD
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
Default

Originally Posted by pickles
Now if only GM would build a 6.2L DOHC motor to go into the new camaros..
Why? You see something wrong with the LS3 motor that the entire SBC world doesnt see? Great low end grunt and excellent top end rush. . . . just about the best of both worlds. A very modest cam and bolt-ons gets it to well over 500hp at the tires. . . . if it aint broke dont fix it. The LS3 motor is just about the perfect small block motor ever made, except for the LS7 of course but thats a small block 427.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 10:32 PM
  #107  
MVDCXJ's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville, MD
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
Default

Originally Posted by Destination XJ
Besides the goat was so great with its short life span

The GTO was only to be a 3 year run, it was NEVER going to be more. It was supposed to be a low production run of vehicles to bring a V8 RWD car back to Pontiac after the demise of the Firebird. In fact the car that became the GTO, the Holden Monaro of Australia, was in production from the late 90's to 2006, the end of its scheduled lifespan. Thats why the GTO could only be on the market for a couple years. The Monaro was sold all over the world under different name plates like Vauxhall and Holden and did very very well and was well liked by auto enthusiasts.

/ thread hijack (it just pisses me off the ignorant GTO haters who only hate because they dont know)
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 11:01 PM
  #108  
00Pajeepcherokee's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 627
Likes: 2
From: Bedford, Pa
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by damageincracing
I wasn't gonna, but I just have to post on this one...

First, I think the fans on my computer move more air than these so called "electric turbo's", and they were far cheaper. I wouldn't use one to cool off my nitro r/c car...

Second, an 11 second 2.5 Ranger? What cliff did you push it off of? Was it being pushed by a train? I should have never sold my 71 Buick GS- it ran 10:62 in the 1/4 at US131 Motorsports Park before I sold it to move to NC. And it was stock... Well mostly stock... The cam,push rods, rockers, and headers were in stock when I bought 'em... That car was KNOWN in Grand Rapids Michigan...
Its winter here or I'd post a video of the thing next time I'm in it.

A Corvette tried passing him on the interstate once. Couldn't get around him till 120+ (that's where it tops out because the tranny slips in overdrive.)

OK. Here's a video of a Chevy pu with around a 500 HP duramax in it.
http://m.youtube.com/index?client=mv...&v=010W0_g9fhc
This ranger beats this thing hands down. That's a mid 12 second 1/4 mile duramax.
To beat this truck by a couple dozen truck lengths he'd run a lower et than mid 12's right?

Anyways, its aparent no one believes me so whatever. Just don't race a little black ranger wit a stack on it in ur gto or u will come crashing back down to earth in a hurry.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 06:49 AM
  #109  
xjdropper's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: warner robins ga
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by thundaluvin
So turbos don't improve fuel economy? hmmmmmm 7.3 non turbo diesel gets 4.6 mpg and the turbo version gets roughly 10 mpg. similarly, non-turbo subarus get less mpg than the turbo version. Yes turbos give more mpg's. whether or not this air turbine will remains to be seen. worse case scenario, you return it for a full refund. where's "gimmick to remove you of your money"?
many turbo versions use slightly taller gearing than their nonboosted models.
Personally I have found I can get away with a much larger tire when i have turboed vehicles but I have always been more interested in economy than 0-60
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 07:26 AM
  #110  
xjdropper's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: warner robins ga
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default leaf blower blower

in alternate of running a squirel cage, a while back I had a theory of using a leaf blower as a booster. In search of proof of theory I snokeled the outlet of a blower into the inlet of a corolla. The result was just as theoried, with a good seal the blower provided a slight increase in idle and was able to provide a fluctuation of rpm when the throtle body of the car was slightly opened.
Further proof of theory was attempted by rigging a additional throtle cable to the blower then riging it to the pulley on the throttle body. I took of the hood (no room for the blower) and did a few test runs, result- very noticable increase in responsiveness and a definite increase in acceleration. I didn't clock it and when the wife got home she envoked instant veto but the proof of theory was established.
now this was done with a little 1.6 engine and a crappy homelite 25cc blower, in theory it would work aswell with a larger 4.0 with a coresponding increase in volume from a better bigger blower. In alternate it could be aranged with an independant throttle attached to a friction bicycle thumb shifter or manual choke lever so that the blower could be utilized or not at any given moment. The only shortfall I have found so far would be starting it, I have yet ot find a small displacement electric start motor to power such. I have looked at some back pack blowers that pack over 2000 cfm that would be more than capable of feeding a 4.0 so what do yall think?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 07:38 AM
  #111  
Destination XJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 3
From: Cleveland, OH
Year: 91 Limited
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by MVDCXJ
The GTO was only to be a 3 year run, it was NEVER going to be more. It was supposed to be a low production run of vehicles to bring a V8 RWD car back to Pontiac after the demise of the Firebird. In fact the car that became the GTO, the Holden Monaro of Australia, was in production from the late 90's to 2006, the end of its scheduled lifespan. Thats why the GTO could only be on the market for a couple years. The Monaro was sold all over the world under different name plates like Vauxhall and Holden and did very very well and was well liked by auto enthusiasts.

/ thread hijack (it just pisses me off the ignorant GTO haters who only hate because they dont know)
Yeah The GTO did so much for Pontiac.

And its not the only car to have over sea models. A lot of cars are based from different models across the world, and usually they are better.

Just because you are a GTO

Dont mean Im a hater. I already said I love the car. But it sure aint the be all/end all of performance cars.


/nutswinging
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 09:17 AM
  #112  
MVDCXJ's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville, MD
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
Default

Originally Posted by Destination XJ
But it sure aint the be all/end all of performance cars.
Never said it was, but its not a overhyped POS like others on here have said. I own one and have owned many other performance vehicles including a couple Mustangs and a NSX and the GTO is hands down FAR better then any of those. Once I am ready for a new fast toy the Z06, C6, is where I am heading

Last edited by MVDCXJ; Jan 18, 2011 at 09:21 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 10:39 AM
  #113  
Destination XJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 3
From: Cleveland, OH
Year: 91 Limited
Model: Cherokee
Default

That's a nice choice! I must have took everything you said like it was meant for me. lol good job text! Any who it's all a different story when money a problem.

And in mustangs defense you can't compare the gto to the 2v.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 12:05 PM
  #114  
N20jeep's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 6,685
Likes: 6
From: Jacksonville, FL
Year: 92
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by MVDCXJ

Never said it was, but its not a overhyped POS like others on here have said. I own one and have owned many other performance vehicles including a couple Mustangs and a NSX and the GTO is hands down FAR better then any of those. Once I am ready for a new fast toy the Z06, C6, is where I am heading
Goats are heavy, and I'm talking in general. Not just comparing to late model mustangs
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 12:07 PM
  #115  
Northwoods Snowman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 976
Likes: 5
From: Cloquet, MN
Year: 2000 Ltd.
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

This thread lost it's funny.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 04:32 PM
  #116  
MVDCXJ's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville, MD
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
Default

Originally Posted by N20jeep
Goats are heavy, and I'm talking in general. Not just comparing to late model mustangs
Yeah they are, but they are still under 2 tons and there are a lot of performance cars out there heavier including the Veyron, just about every AMG even the coupes, and all the SRT's. GTO weighs as much as a Supra. Mine without me weighs just about 3400 lbs and it still has a full interior and a spare.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 04:52 PM
  #117  
Gee oh Dee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,168
Likes: 5
From: Milwaukee, WI
Year: 1987
Engine: Check
Default

Originally Posted by MVDCXJ
^^
You are too funny.

Never did I once compare it to a Mustang. DestinationXJ said it already, they are different cars, and different classes. No comparison.

Unless you wanna compare apples to oranges.

Yes, I said overrated. If the GTO was the best bang for your buck car, why aren't they made anymore?

Exactly.

I'll stick by my statement.

Overrated, underpowered for their weight.

There are plenty of better cars out there.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 10:37 PM
  #118  
fishunterx's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: St. Helens, Or
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.5L
Default

..............can't we all just agree to disagree? I love the GTO, but my favorite muscle car is a 67 Camaro. I also like the late 60's Fastback Mustang's. 67-69 Firebirds are nice too.

So if ya have a muscle car, or a preference to muscle cars, and someone else doesn't agree. Just realize that you like it, and it doesn't matter if they like it or not, it's still what you like. On the other hand, if someone like something you don't.... well that's where we are all human, if we all liked the same stuff.... how boring would that be?

This thread was started about the electric superchargers.

I THINK WE'VE ESTABLISHED THAT THEY DON'T WORK.

Is there anything else left to be said?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 10:58 PM
  #119  
Destination XJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 3
From: Cleveland, OH
Year: 91 Limited
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by fishunterx
..............can't we all just agree to disagree? I love the GTO, but my favorite muscle car is a 67 Camaro. I also like the late 60's Fastback Mustang's. 67-69 Firebirds are nice too.

So if ya have a muscle car, or a preference to muscle cars, and someone else doesn't agree. Just realize that you like it, and it doesn't matter if they like it or not, it's still what you like. On the other hand, if someone like something you don't.... well that's where we are all human, if we all liked the same stuff.... how boring would that be?

This thread was started about the electric superchargers.

I THINK WE'VE ESTABLISHED THAT THEY DON'T WORK.

Is there anything else left to be said?
Yeah...






















































Good post!

I agree its opinion and we all are entitled to them!
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 10:03 PM
  #120  
ivie_2006's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: woodward
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0l
Default

pontiacs problem at the end of their run was that they became a testfire for some dumb gm ideas, the late gto would never have saved them and made no effort to.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 AM.