Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

RE vs. T&T vs. BDS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 02:02 PM
  #1  
KR2590's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default RE vs. T&T vs. BDS

I am new to the game and all these choices are making my head spin. Can the experts or those with experience share their opinions on which lift kit is (subjective) best choice and why(include technical reasons if you can please). I realize this is all a matter of preference and user satisfaction but going to give this a shot anyway. I am looking at the higher end long arm lift kits either 5.5 or 6.5" to put 33"x10.5" (with option of 33x12.5 later) on a 2000 XJ. Either a RE, BDS or T&T Customs long arm kit. Please ignore the cost as it is not a factor. They are all in the same ball park and my intent is to go with a high quality lift. If any of you are reps for these companies I would love to have a side conversation with you.

P.S. I am contemplating going with a 4.5" long arm kit if it will fit 33x10.5s but I don't have a gauge of how much trimming would be required(would rather avoid trimming), how will my flex be effected/sacrificed and general aesthetics. If you can shed any light on this go for it. Would love to see pictures of your rigs if they have this set up also.

Thanks for the help.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 02:06 PM
  #2  
93XJLI's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 11
From: LI, NY
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0, bolt ons for days...
Default

This gets argued every week. Did you even bother searching?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 02:37 PM
  #3  
KR2590's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Yea I searched it first. Did not find anything specific to that triple header match up.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 03:05 PM
  #4  
TN12valve's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

You should probably look at each specific company and make the choice based on your budget, type of terrain you will be running, and mechanical skill level.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 03:18 PM
  #5  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by KR2590
Please ignore the cost as it is not a factor.
all of those are good companies. but if cost was not a factor I'd have to go Clayton 4.5" long arm

http://claytonoffroad.com/product_in...roducts_id/348

or if you're really serious about cost not being a factor

http://claytonoffroad.com/product_in...roducts_id/331
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 03:22 PM
  #6  
KR2590's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

O man I like these Clayton Kits as well. Do not want a rear coil conversion though. What are these 3 link kits all about? Any specific reasons why you recommend Clayton over the others?

Last edited by KR2590; Jun 11, 2012 at 03:25 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 03:29 PM
  #7  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

that particular 3 link is what you would use for much larger tires and axles. or rock racing. it's just stronger but you wont really see much difference in flex or anything. the long arm kit will work just as well
through my research, clayton just seems to have the undisputed highest quality products.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 07:34 PM
  #8  
tommyxj2000's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: dingmans Ferry, PA
Year: 99
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

i had the re lift kit before they restructured so dont know if the quality is still there...only problem i had with the kit was the bushings sucked
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2012 | 08:15 PM
  #9  
MTLXJ's Avatar
Cherokee Forum Vendor
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 1
From: Montreal, Canada
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: V6 4L
Default

I like bds. Good quality products.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2012 | 05:16 AM
  #10  
Drewjharper1900's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 3
From: Tampa Fl
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

I 2nd clayton. Very well designed, very beefy parts!
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2012 | 09:04 AM
  #11  
TN12valve's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Wish i had the money for Clayton stuff... Beautifully built products and a fantastic warranty.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2012 | 05:44 PM
  #12  
MannyLedezma's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, AR
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

TNT longarm is beefy, flexes very well, rides smooth, and I have no complaints.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2012 | 09:02 PM
  #13  
Tom95YJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 3
From: SLC, Utah
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

You can not compair TNT to RE or BDS , TNT is far superrior , Now TNT and Clayton can be compaired in terms of quality and strength


I am considering both tnt and clayton for my XJ build.

I am leaning towards TNT because of the 1 Piece belly pan An I would have to Purchase a T case skid from Clayton which means more money out of my pocket An clayton has a 3 piece cross member . Both have a rear LA kit for the future . Both use Johnny Joints.
But at the end of the day I still don't know which one I would choose an I have been trying to decide for months !


My vote goes towards TNT or Clayton

Last edited by Tom95YJ; Jun 12, 2012 at 09:08 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2012 | 09:56 PM
  #14  
Atmos's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,387
Likes: 10
From: City of Trees, CA
Year: 93 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by Tom95YJ
I am leaning towards TNT because of the 1 Piece belly pan
holy hell. I just checked out that LA upgrade. I want it too! amazing looking product
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2012 | 10:06 PM
  #15  
Tom95YJ's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 3
From: SLC, Utah
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

Originally Posted by Atmos
holy hell. I just checked out that LA upgrade. I want it too! amazing looking product
My cowork has been beating on his TNT kit for years It is a Tuff Piece !
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.