Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

Just traded up to a 14

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:04 PM
  #16  
bwb0440's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

personally, i dislike the new cherokee alot. i dont think it deserves to be called a cherokee. someones gatta do a solid axle swap, lift it atleast 2.5-3 inches and throw some muddies on. id love to see that, and then ill call it a cherokee. maybe.
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:04 PM
  #17  
motorcharge's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by xj195
man up and get the new trailhawk trim (KL?) Cherokee.
That does not make sense.
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:05 PM
  #18  
XJPat's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Year: 91
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I6 H.O.
Default

Originally Posted by 95Cherokee
Most people who disliked the Aztec were probably short on funds too.
Haha
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:15 PM
  #19  
spaz_22's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by bwb0440
personally, i dislike the new cherokee alot. i dont think it deserves to be called a cherokee. someones gatta do a solid axle swap, lift it atleast 2.5-3 inches and throw some muddies on. id love to see that, and then ill call it a cherokee. maybe.
2 solid axles. Transmission. Transfer case. Drive shafts. Steering box. Front suspension. Rear suspension. Reposition motor. Electronics. And probably a new steering column since its electric steering. Wish anyone who wants to tackle it luck.
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:15 PM
  #20  
NewKindOfClown's Avatar
Moderator of Jeeps
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 21,029
Likes: 3
From: Frederick, MD from Cleveland, OH
Year: 1993 YJ Wrangler
Engine: 4.0 I6
Default

Originally Posted by xj195
Well as owner of both I guess I'm an unbiased opinion then.
Owning both doesn't make you unbiased. If you value them based on cost, your slant is clear.
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:19 PM
  #21  
JWheeler's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: WA
Model: Cherokee
Default

Congrats on the new purchase. 3.2L? Let's see pics. I've driven a few and kinda like em.
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:37 PM
  #22  
highmileage's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield CA
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Default

Thinking about aftermarket, you could look at a Honda CRV for possible parts. Pretty much the same set up as the new Cherokee in its AWD form, and from what I have seen a higher profile. Could be the start of a budget boost?
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:40 PM
  #23  
xj195's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Originally Posted by NewKindOfClown
Owning both doesn't make you unbiased. If you value them based on cost, your slant is clear.
Not at all, my remark was about people being disrespectful without motivation. My opinion on the vehicle stands.
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:40 PM
  #24  
Stuck-n-mud's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Mile from Tomken
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

New "Cherokee" Bah humbug.
I heard the advertisement on the tv while my face was suck in the iPad. Google it and was sadly disappointed. I thought it looked like a BMW crossover kinda thing. Only thing I liked about it was that it was a 4x4 ( in jeeps line up ) but can't nock the guy around for calling ( those who don't buy one ) others broke, cheap, or what not. Y'all should be bagging' on him for trading in the XJ.
That's what wrong with the picture???? This rich guy should have thrown down a bigger down payment to meet a monthly payment he could afford, and kept his XJ
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 07:55 PM
  #25  
xj195's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default

Why?
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 08:08 PM
  #26  
scottmphoto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 957
Likes: 2
From: Russellville, Arkansas
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 I-6
Default

Originally Posted by xj195

Not at all, my remark was about people being disrespectful without motivation. My opinion on the vehicle stands.
Disrespectful? Calling the newest member of the Jeep family a Cherokee is disrespecting our beloved XJ's. Let's see just how capable the kl is. Let's see that motor and tranny hit 400,000 miles. I doubt that a 2014 KL will still be on the road in 22 years (my current XJ is a '91). The KL is NOT a Cherokee. It doesn't look like it, it's not built even along the same lines as a Cherokee. It doesn't have a transfer case and it doesn't have solid axles. You're going to have to get a college degree in computers, electronics and automotive technology to be able to work on anything more than the basic things (or go to a dealer, which is their master plan to make more money).
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 08:21 PM
  #27  
JWheeler's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: WA
Model: Cherokee
Default

It is fine to not like the new Cherokee. Most of the people on this forum are probably not the target customer they are marketing towards. The problem I have with all the complaints is whining about new technology and not being able to work on it. This can be said about almost any new vehicle.
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 08:34 PM
  #28  
stormitecture's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, FL & DC/MD infrequently
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
Default

Originally Posted by spaz_22
Bushwhacker will prolly make fender flares for it before anybody else makes anything for it. Next will be a company that failed at making parts for any other car will make crap for the new cherokee and people will by it because they'll be first
I wouldn't count on fender flares. They didn't make any for the Grand Cherokee from 2005 to 2010. Now you got to prove (or disprove if I'm completely wrong) and build it up. If parts don't exist...make them!

Last edited by stormitecture; Nov 28, 2013 at 08:49 PM.
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 08:37 PM
  #29  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Here we go again...





Seriously. Let's see some wheeling pics that are a little better than Chrysler's marketing of the KL on a gravel road.
Old Nov 28, 2013 | 08:41 PM
  #30  
95Cherokee's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 3
From: Houston Tx.
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

The KL will not be extremely off road worthy without shoveling boatloads of cash at it, which makes little sense since an XJ can be made to tackle most anything with only small wheelbarrows full of cash being shoveled at it.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 PM.