Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

electric Jeep

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2013 | 03:48 AM
  #31  
andrewmp6's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 17
From: Louisville,KY
Model: Cherokee
Default

With any motor vehicle you will always have emissions,A electric car the power your taking from the pole was made with emissions.Only way around that solar panels on the car or house both are pricey.If you want cheap 0 emissions get a horse and learn to ride it.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2013 | 09:40 AM
  #32  
SoCalxJ4.0's Avatar
CF Veteran
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 5
From: Pahrump, NV
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

The new ford ev's are claiming 300 miles per charge. I'm pretty sure, those numbers do not take into account load. So lets say you can get 300 miles on flat ground, what happens when you start doing hills? Batteries drain faster. If you are in the sticks, a xj covered in solar panels ain't going to charge your power bank for ish, if you can even get the sun.

Cost: will be through the roof

When the system collapses, there will be no power grid. Do you have a lot of generators, solar, windmills, hydro wheels to keep it going? What happens when those batteries meet their max life? Where will you get new ones? What about when electric motors burn out? Are you knowledgable on reworking them??

Too many negatives. The only positive I can see, electric motors produce max torque no matter where the skinny pedal is....
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2013 | 10:34 AM
  #33  
muskrat's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.6 stroker
Default

My boss's 2007 escape hybrids battery pack STB at 98000 miles (replaced under warranty)
Another couple months he would have been SOL.
And what about water crossings?
North East winters with heater/defroster, lights,radio all running at once?
Battery technology isn't there yet just ask A123 systems. Oh that's right millions in federal $
And they still went bankrupt.
Perpetual motion?
Not in our lifetime probably never.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2013 | 08:33 PM
  #34  
dnuccio's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 960
Likes: 3
From: Ahwatukee, Phoenix, AZ
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Default

cool idea? hell yeah
practical/worth the cost and effort? hell NO

JMHO
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2013 | 09:27 PM
  #35  
anywhere & everywhere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 561
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: straight 6
Default

Originally Posted by dnuccio
cool idea? hell yeah
practical/worth the cost and effort? hell NO

JMHO
Thanks. It's funny how everyone gets so worked up about this interesting idea.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 03:15 AM
  #36  
Morat's Avatar
CF Veteran
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 74
From: North Riding of Yorkshire, UK
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Troll alert!

Anyway, electric vehicles won't be 0 emission until we crack nuclear fusion. Even then, there'll be an environmental cost to build the power stations themselves.
Until then I'm running on propane - 30% less CO2 emissions if that worries you. Personally I'm in it for the cost saving which is about 40% in the UK because the government taxes Propane (we call it LPG) at a lower rate than Petrol (GAS) because of the lower CO2 output.

IMO electric vehicles will always suck if they rely on batteries. Fuel cells are the way forward simply because you can refuel them with water/diesel/whatever they're running on instead of having to recharge them for hours. Any battery that charges fast dies soon.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2013 | 03:44 AM
  #37  
anywhere & everywhere's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 561
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
Year: 1988
Model: Cherokee
Engine: straight 6
Default

Originally Posted by Morat
Troll alert!

Anyway, electric vehicles won't be 0 emission until we crack nuclear fusion. Even then, there'll be an environmental cost to build the power stations themselves.
Until then I'm running on propane - 30% less CO2 emissions if that worries you. Personally I'm in it for the cost saving which is about 40% in the UK because the government taxes Propane (we call it LPG) at a lower rate than Petrol (GAS) because of the lower CO2 output.

IMO electric vehicles will always suck if they rely on batteries. Fuel cells are the way forward simply because you can refuel them with water/diesel/whatever they're running on instead of having to recharge them for hours. Any battery that charges fast dies soon.
Interesting points. Thanks for the constructive advice.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XJ ONLY
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
8
Jan 26, 2019 06:30 PM
xjmachine
Fabrication & builders section.
25
Sep 27, 2015 08:22 AM
rusty_bucket
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
3
Aug 29, 2015 06:42 AM
moparchero
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
0
Aug 26, 2015 12:58 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM.