Comanche Concept (Redesign) Inputs!
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 766
Likes: 5
From: Los Angeles, CA
Year: 1989 Limited
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: I-6 4.0L AMC Renix
I would but I can't copy the full design and just put a pickup bed in the back, I need to make my own design but it is acceptable for me to borrow a feature or two like the headlights from the orange one and use it on my design. Hope that makes sense.
CF Veteran




Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,609
Likes: 446
From: Michigan
Year: 1987 MJ, 1973 J2000, 1986 XJ, 08 JK
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0L H.O
jumping in a little late. a practical square designed body. Not overly churched up with sleek lines that turn the overall vehicle into a turtle shell.. It was a light duty pickup truck keep in mind. Might be my love for the original MJ talking...
Do they teach the golden ratio? The thing with the cherokee is that I've heard that it uses that for most everything. Its hard for people to not find it at least somewhat attractive. When they designed the jacked up Dart (KL) it seemed to outright be a joke. Its hard even when forced to find a pleasing set of shapes or proportions.
I too am tired of curvy Jeeps (and cars in general) with big front overhangs, a huge distance to the base of the windshield and huge A pillars.
I really would love a modern XJ. All the same proportions. Change the details on the nose and tail, bigger backseat, spare underneath or on the tailgate. Won't work for this project I realize, but I haven't been interested in a Jeep since the demise of the XJ/TJ. This from someone that made a choice between going to CCS and engineering. I chose the latter.
I too am tired of curvy Jeeps (and cars in general) with big front overhangs, a huge distance to the base of the windshield and huge A pillars.
I really would love a modern XJ. All the same proportions. Change the details on the nose and tail, bigger backseat, spare underneath or on the tailgate. Won't work for this project I realize, but I haven't been interested in a Jeep since the demise of the XJ/TJ. This from someone that made a choice between going to CCS and engineering. I chose the latter.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 766
Likes: 5
From: Los Angeles, CA
Year: 1989 Limited
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: I-6 4.0L AMC Renix
I'm so tired of hearing this. A unibody designed for truck strength will be much stronger than a steel frame. A team of PhD holding engineers at Chrysler proved this out - it would have been done for 2019 but marketing told them that "the average truck buyer" wouldn't accept that. So if the next gen Ram end up being heavy - blame the rednecks.
Do they teach the golden ratio? The thing with the cherokee is that I've heard that it uses that for most everything. Its hard for people to not find it at least somewhat attractive. When they designed the jacked up Dart (KL) it seemed to outright be a joke. Its hard even when forced to find a pleasing set of shapes or proportions.
I too am tired of curvy Jeeps (and cars in general) with big front overhangs, a huge distance to the base of the windshield and huge A pillars.
I really would love a modern XJ. All the same proportions. Change the details on the nose and tail, bigger backseat, spare underneath or on the tailgate. Won't work for this project I realize, but I haven't been interested in a Jeep since the demise of the XJ/TJ. This from someone that made a choice between going to CCS and engineering. I chose the latter.
I too am tired of curvy Jeeps (and cars in general) with big front overhangs, a huge distance to the base of the windshield and huge A pillars.
I really would love a modern XJ. All the same proportions. Change the details on the nose and tail, bigger backseat, spare underneath or on the tailgate. Won't work for this project I realize, but I haven't been interested in a Jeep since the demise of the XJ/TJ. This from someone that made a choice between going to CCS and engineering. I chose the latter.
This is my side view rendering that incorporates as much of the suggestions everyone brought up as I could while still designing something that could actually be produced in 4-7 years.
Last edited by LiamLikeNeeson; Sep 15, 2016 at 01:35 PM.
::CF Administrator::





Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 805
From: Blunt, South Dakota
Year: 97
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.6 stroker
Brochacho, if I were you, I would delete that file IMMEDIATELY then. You can't post an image on the interwebz and ask nicely for people not to repost it...once it's out there, it's game on. Just sayin'
No, I don't lick fish.



Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 11,169
Likes: 26
From: Northern Kentucky
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 892
Likes: 4
From: Lennox/Sioux Falls South Dakota
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0 liter inline 6
You sir have talent, i have always wanted to be able to put my concepts i have in my head on paper but i dont have patience or steady hands.
CF Veteran

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 37
From: Dont Colorado Wyoming
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 793
Likes: 5
From: Southgate, Michigan
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.6 I6
No, I don't lick fish.



Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 11,169
Likes: 26
From: Northern Kentucky
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 766
Likes: 5
From: Los Angeles, CA
Year: 1989 Limited
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: I-6 4.0L AMC Renix
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KTW
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
5
Dec 22, 2016 08:29 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)




