4.0 MPG versus 4.7 MPG
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Now im not to conplain about gas or prices other wise I would drive a Prius and wheel that..
I cant seem to work out but..
My WJ 4.7 gets 17 MPG on a combined cycle.
My XJ 4.0 gets 14 MPG on a combined cycle.
The XJ has had new NGK O2 sensors, walker cat converter, new 4 hole bosch fuel injectors, coolant and temp sensor, TB complete clean, new TPS and IAC, coolant flush out with new tstat and WP, frequent oil changes and new Chapion spark plugs.
WtF??? I thought the XJ should use less gas than the 4.7?
I cant seem to work out but..
My WJ 4.7 gets 17 MPG on a combined cycle.
My XJ 4.0 gets 14 MPG on a combined cycle.
The XJ has had new NGK O2 sensors, walker cat converter, new 4 hole bosch fuel injectors, coolant and temp sensor, TB complete clean, new TPS and IAC, coolant flush out with new tstat and WP, frequent oil changes and new Chapion spark plugs.
WtF??? I thought the XJ should use less gas than the 4.7?
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,367
Likes: 23
From: Oroville, CA
Year: 1995
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 with all of the noise and clatter
The WJ has MPG friendly gearing and more precise fuel management. Plus it slips through the air a little better than the box shaped XJ.
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 1
From: Wilmington,NC
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I got 24mpgs in town in my XJ on a 2" lift and 30" a/ts. Mine is an 89 tho. Figure newer models should do better but may e its due to my driving style that helped get the mps so high.
Seasoned Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 341
Likes: 1
From: Irvine Ca
Year: 1989 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
The 4.7 was a brand new engine for the wj and designed more for power and mpg.And the wj is more rounded so drag on the body is probably less then the xj which is a box on wheels.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 552
Likes: 1
From: Central Indiana
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Herp Derp Jerp

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Lol 24 MPG city with a 4.0L. Maybe if you run 2:1 gears and it's a bodyless frame.
Mister OP, indeed the V8 Grands have always had better in-town fuel economy than the 4.0L. It's not your imagination. It takes a lot less effort for the more powerful engine to get these things going. 4.0L WJ is pretty bad on gas. 2.5L in XJs is much less than you'd think too.
Mister OP, indeed the V8 Grands have always had better in-town fuel economy than the 4.0L. It's not your imagination. It takes a lot less effort for the more powerful engine to get these things going. 4.0L WJ is pretty bad on gas. 2.5L in XJs is much less than you'd think too.
Last edited by salad; Apr 22, 2014 at 12:58 PM.
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 1
From: Wilmington,NC
Year: 1989
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
CF Veteran
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,686
Likes: 6
From: Hudson, FL
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L Inline 6
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
My wife has just told me I should drop a V8 in the XJ. Dropping the 5.2 or 5.9 is more complicated than a 350 Chev / tranny combo?. There are threads on these, Ill start searchin.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Herp Derp Jerp

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
I've seen these swaps before and they're pretty slick.


