Cherokee Chat General non-tech Cherokee chat
XJ/MJ/ZJ/WJ

2000 cherokee vs 2015 Wrangler Unlimited

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 10:27 AM
  #1  
cherokee001's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Default 2000 cherokee vs 2015 Wrangler Unlimited

Recently I've been on the fence to get a new jeep. I love the new wrangler unlimited special editions. However never drove one. This weekend I took a 6speed out for a test drive.

Impressions. What a slow clanky POS. I love the interior and exterior. But the engine was beyond noisy, had zero torque, zero power. No clue where in hell this 265hp is because my lifted 31' tire cherokee could totally whoop the *** of a new wrangler. Will be keeping the cherokee.

Just very surprised. And disappointed since I had high hopes. Anyone else's thoughts?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 12:22 PM
  #2  
cherokee001's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Default

nothing? wow, doesn't anyone have experience with wranglers?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 12:35 PM
  #3  
kcdt58's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 417
Likes: 1
From: Hickory, NC
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: 4.0 L
Default

One of my friends bought a 2014 JK and the two times I rode in it i felt it had some decent power & torque. It was an automatic. Also the motor was fairly quiet...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 01:12 PM
  #4  
jbsjunk's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 3
From: Hudsonville, MI
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 5.0
Default

One has a payment book, the other not. Give it more than 2 hours next time someone doesn't jump on your question.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 02:59 PM
  #5  
black label's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Litre
Default

My guess is you drove the wrangler like you drive your XJ.

The wrangler makes 285hp at 6400 rpms, if you aren't getting to at least 4000-5500 rpms before shifting you are shifting too soon to get the power. Unless your XJ is heavily modified for horsepower, I seriously doubt it I anywhere near as fast as a modern wrangler.

If you drive a Ferrari like you drive a tractor it would feel slow and clunky too.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 04:30 PM
  #6  
s346k's Avatar
CF Veteran
Premium Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 18
From: central IN
Year: 1997
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by black label
The wrangler makes 285hp at 6400 rpms, if you aren't getting to at least 6400-6500 rpms before shifting you are shifting too soon to get the power.
QFT then FIFY. I think I'm too old to be using those letter combinations correctly.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 04:57 PM
  #7  
93_xjcherokee's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 9
From: tucson
Year: 1992
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Traitor
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2014 | 05:20 PM
  #8  
black label's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Litre
Default

Originally Posted by s346k
QFT then FIFY. I think I'm too old to be using those letter combinations correctly.
We're both right

That engine makes about 90% of its torque @ 3500 and pretty much flat lines until red line. The hp curve is very linear and quite steady with no real spikes from 1000-6500 rpms.

If you were shifting at 5500-6000, I'm guessing you'd be dropping into the full torque area in the next gear for a quick steady pull.

I'm guessing the old low rpm 4.0 is a better off roading engine though.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 02:32 AM
  #9  
stang65's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: oregon
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 ho 99 intake ps pump 1" tb spacer 62mm bored tb eletric fans and more
Default

JK I had on my honneymoon had no were near the low end feel of my xj but was nice to drive around although it did find its self shifting way to much on maui
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 03:16 AM
  #10  
andrewmp6's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,014
Likes: 17
From: Louisville,KY
Model: Cherokee
Default

Its got a minivan engine you think its going to be fast?The 4.0 is like a old tractor engine all the torque down low where you want it.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 08:19 AM
  #11  
emptypockets's Avatar
::Regional Moderator::
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 6
From: Over here...
Year: 1986
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 2.8
Default

I've never bought a Jeep product thinking I was buying a super fast sports car.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 11:17 AM
  #12  
XJNVA's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: Purcellville, Virginia
Year: '95
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Default

JK's aren't exactly SRT8's.... They weigh a lot and have Caravan motors.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 03:04 PM
  #13  
black label's Avatar
Seasoned Member
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Litre
Default

Originally Posted by andrewmp6
Its got a minivan engine you think its going to be fast?The 4.0 is like a old tractor engine all the torque down low where you want it.
2001 XJ 0-60 9.1 seconds.

http://www.automobile-catalog.com/ma...2_4d/2001.html

2014 dodge caravan 0-60 7.2 seconds.

http://m.autos.aol.com/2014-dodge-gr..._van/overview/

I'm not saying the new motor is a better off roading motor but it's faster than a 4.0 XJ on the road.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 03:16 PM
  #14  
Tsaani97xj's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 688
Likes: 33
From: Maryland
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Car and Driver shows the 2012 JK doing 6.8 0-60.

I havent driven one but something doesnt sound right. I agree with all about our beloved 4.0s low rpm torque but those JKs should scoot if you let it rev.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2014 | 10:41 PM
  #15  
dmill89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 918
Likes: 6
From: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Year: 1995
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by Tsaani97xj
Car and Driver shows the 2012 JK doing 6.8 0-60.

I havent driven one but something doesnt sound right. I agree with all about our beloved 4.0s low rpm torque but those JKs should scoot if you let it rev.
By a stop watch the JKs probably are faster, but lack of low-end torque has a major effect on the "feel" of a vehicle.


At work we have a bunch of 2012-2013 Chevy Impala company cars with the GM "High-Feature" (LFX) 3.6L V6 (302hp, 252 lb-ft) that we use for business trips, these are pretty quick on paper (~6.5 sec. 0-60) but with no low end torque they feel like absolute slugs and usually need to downshift two gears on even the slightest incline.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 AM.