2000 cherokee vs 2015 Wrangler Unlimited
The fastest xj numbers i found is 1996 Jeep Cherokee Sport 0-60 mph 8.2 Quarter mile 16.2 and was probably 2wd.And the slowest 1996 Jeep Cherokee SE 0-60 mph 10.5 Quarter mile 17.5.On the jk i found 2013 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon (Auto) 0-60 mph 7.7 Quarter Mile 16.1 and 2012 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon Xplore (Auto) 0-60 mph 8.7 Quarter Mile 16.6
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 1
From: Frankfort IL
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
One of the most significant reasons your butt dyno was off is that an xj is a lot louder, more uncomfortable and just more "theatrical". So it seems like your going fast when really your really almost catching up to the newest minivan or a Prius. Wrangler seems slower because your suppose to be more cozy and separated from the elements while driving it. Just like old muscle cars that are slower then a modernday golf gti. But if you take a ride in both it feels the other way around
Last edited by helmut; Nov 19, 2014 at 07:25 AM.
Helmut makes a great point.
Ive driven both, & the wrangler is quieter, faster with better on & off-road manners. Im just not going to spend $40k for one.
Also remember you need to take into account whether each truck was modified in any way (suspension, engine, interior).
Ive driven both, & the wrangler is quieter, faster with better on & off-road manners. Im just not going to spend $40k for one.
Also remember you need to take into account whether each truck was modified in any way (suspension, engine, interior).
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
i guess my butt dyno must be off. I floored the Wrangler and it felt like it just wasn't moving. It was a 6sp so i'm curious if the autos are quicker due to gearing. I wasn't looking for a sports car, but i was looking for a noticeable improvement over my XJ. Quite possibly the torque in my XJ is what enthuses me and the wrangler is missing low end torque. However the Wrangler is much louder than my XJ by a lot. My ears work fine (I think)
and I was surprised to hear the engine as much as I did. I think i need to take an auto wrangler out to feel the difference.
and I was surprised to hear the engine as much as I did. I think i need to take an auto wrangler out to feel the difference.
CF Veteran
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 1
From: Frankfort IL
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
i guess my butt dyno must be off. I floored the Wrangler and it felt like it just wasn't moving. It was a 6sp so i'm curious if the autos are quicker due to gearing. I wasn't looking for a sports car, but i was looking for a noticeable improvement over my XJ. Quite possibly the torque in my XJ is what enthuses me and the wrangler is missing low end torque. However the Wrangler is much louder than my XJ by a lot. My ears work fine (I think)
and I was surprised to hear the engine as much as I did. I think i need to take an auto wrangler out to feel the difference.
and I was surprised to hear the engine as much as I did. I think i need to take an auto wrangler out to feel the difference.Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: LONG ISLAND
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
I almost bought a 2014 Wrangler Rubicon, ALMOST. I backed off because of a few reasons
1.) The price, even though I talked them down, I felt I was paying too much for something I sort of already had
2.)The shape, Im not a fan of the JK look.. unless its got the slant top..then it reminds me of the cherokee <3
3.)Wouldnt be able to modify it as much as I want due to high payments
I did love the interior though, and everything about the JK, the pick up speed, the suspension, etc etc.
If I can have all of that in my XJ..I would never need to buy a car again.
EDIT: Also the Wrangler is DEFINITELY NOT Louder than the XJ.
1.) The price, even though I talked them down, I felt I was paying too much for something I sort of already had
2.)The shape, Im not a fan of the JK look.. unless its got the slant top..then it reminds me of the cherokee <3
3.)Wouldnt be able to modify it as much as I want due to high payments
I did love the interior though, and everything about the JK, the pick up speed, the suspension, etc etc.
If I can have all of that in my XJ..I would never need to buy a car again.
EDIT: Also the Wrangler is DEFINITELY NOT Louder than the XJ.
I have a video of my stock xj doing 0-60 in what appears to be about 5.5 seconds. I have no idea how they timed that one to 9+. and I'd put it up against any jk, even after the lift and larger tires.
Last edited by s346k; Nov 19, 2014 at 08:01 PM.
Seasoned Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Litre
Think about the logistics of your claim. You're saying your minimum of 13 year old SUV accelerates as quickly as a 2014 sports car that has a top speed of 164 mph.
No way a stock XJ is even close to 5.5 seconds. A 1969 COPO camaro (COPO 9560) had an aluminum block 427, 500hp, 450 ft/lbs of torque and did 0-60 in 5.3.
No way a stock XJ does it in less than 8. It's not possible without dropping it out of an airplane.
CF Veteran

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 9
From: Georgia
Year: 99 94
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: I6
The numbers I posted were manufacturer claims. I seriously doubt your XJ does 0-60 as fast as a 2014 base model porsche boxster. Think about the logistics of your claim. You're saying your minimum of 13 year old SUV accelerates as quickly as a 2014 sports car that has a top speed of 164 mph. No way a stock XJ is even close to 5.5 seconds. A 1969 COPO camaro (COPO 9560) had an aluminum block 427, 500hp, 450 ft/lbs of torque and did 0-60 in 5.3. No way a stock XJ does it in less than 8. It's not possible without dropping it out of an airplane.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Year: 1996
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Turbo XJ has a turbo XJ right? And what about all those super charged XJs on YouTube? Choose the XJ
Edit: drove a jku one time, like the low end torque xj better. Jku had lift 35s & 6spd. Felt like a car though
Edit: drove a jku one time, like the low end torque xj better. Jku had lift 35s & 6spd. Felt like a car though
Last edited by crabmushrooms5; Nov 19, 2014 at 11:01 PM.
Seasoned Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Litre
I'm guessing the turbo'd and supercharged xj's out there are probably still geared more for off road prowess than track/street performance.
Herp Derp Jerp

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Isn't the JK slated to get the little diesel the half-ton Ram just got? Or was that all rumour?
Seasoned Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 Litre
All I'm saying is it's faster.
I'm not sure how the new wrangler 6 speed manual is geared but I'm guessing it's more to keep the cafe regulators happy than the off road enthusiasts.
Adding a diesel would probably help keep both sides happy. Better fuel economy for cafe, gobs of low end torque for off roaders.



