The Homebrew Jeep Mod Thread
CF Veteran

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Ross Vegas, Ga
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 w/ tupy head
I've been debating on using the factory air compressor or using an inverter with a small pancake compressor. I have a freon leak but cant find it probably in the dash, dryer I think
Seasoned Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 309
Likes: 2
From: Jackson, WYoming
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I6
Seasoned Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Interior of Alaska
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
OBA is 'on demand' only. It only takes about 40 seconds to complete fill the system from zero, so not really an issue...especially since it's only hot enough for AC about 2 weeks a year.
Seasoned Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Interior of Alaska
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
1) High speed collision in reverse. I don't drive fast enough in reverse to warrant this as a concern
2) Head on collision while sitting at stop. It still has to shear the 4 bolts simultaneously and a host of other factors to perfectly fly through a windshield at the same angle. Some final fantasy stuff.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 976
Likes: 5
From: Cloquet, MN
Year: 2000 Ltd.
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L I6
I read this all the time and I still can't figure out a scenario in respect to Newton's three laws of motion where this would be a huge concern. Only two scenarios I can think of that would even apply.
1) High speed collision in reverse. I don't drive fast enough in reverse to warrant this as a concern
2) Head on collision while sitting at stop. It still has to shear the 4 bolts simultaneously and a host of other factors to perfectly fly through a windshield at the same angle. Some final fantasy stuff.
1) High speed collision in reverse. I don't drive fast enough in reverse to warrant this as a concern
2) Head on collision while sitting at stop. It still has to shear the 4 bolts simultaneously and a host of other factors to perfectly fly through a windshield at the same angle. Some final fantasy stuff.
http://www.annarbor.com/news/ypsilan...ownship-crash/
CF Veteran
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,812
Likes: 0
From: South Mills, NC
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: Rebuilt 4.0L I6
If a head on collision in a 45 mph zone does this to a Cherokee, how hard do you think it would be to shear off four bolts? Just imagine if the other vehicle was taller like a full size pickup. I'm not one to risk being decapitated by my hood. YMMV.
http://www.annarbor.com/news/ypsilan...ownship-crash/
If a head on collision in a 45 mph zone does this to a Cherokee, how hard do you think it would be to shear off four bolts? Just imagine if the other vehicle was taller like a full size pickup. I'm not one to risk being decapitated by my hood. YMMV.


http://www.annarbor.com/news/ypsilan...ownship-crash/
http://www.annarbor.com/news/ypsilan...ownship-crash/
And remember what Newton said, an object in motion stays in motion until acted upon by an outside force. You hood is an object in motion so its propensity is travel forward. Meaning it will crumple as it hits a pickup, not break 4 bolts simultaneously while continuing to be in perfect form.
CF Veteran
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 6
From: St. Joseph, MO
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
a head on in a 45 is like a wall at 90. At I didn't say that they wouldn't shear, I said simultaneously. With the way the hood is aligned in respect the windshield the bolts would need to all shear at the same time.
And remember what Newton said, an object in motion stays in motion until acted upon by an outside force. You hood is an object in motion so its propensity is travel forward. Meaning it will crumple as it hits a pickup, not break 4 bolts simultaneously while continuing to be in perfect form.
Seasoned Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Ware Shoals, SC
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
CF Veteran
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 6
From: St. Joseph, MO
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
They did a head to head crash at 50 then hitting a wall at 50 then hitting a wall at 100. The car that hit it at 100 was smashed back to the trunk and the head to. Head cars both didn't crush back passed the front doors. I think the law they used was "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" I could be wrong though.





