Probably. Back in 07 when I got my cherokee, EVERYONE had stock cherokees with 200k on them listed for 9k. And then one day, I found a guy who didn't check for market value, only blue book and got a steal. LOL

 

Only 78k on that thing?? Not too bad of a deal. 9 grand is a lot though.

 

What ya guys think?! Before and after

 

looks good now you need larger tires.

 

need to get some bfgs on there

 

X2

 

BFGs over Kevlars? No way, even KM2s don't look as good and from what i've heard (with a grain of salt) KM2s are decent in mud and thats about it.

 

Haha naa I love my 35s!!

 

Doesn't matter how a tire looks it's how it performs. Also directional tire not ftw

 

Yep well aware. The old MTRs I do like though.

 

Who cares about looks....BFGs out perform MTRs in every aspect. Im for results, not looks.... I have ran both, so I speak from experience!

 

Ive wheeled both. km2 ftw they hold up much better in rocks they actually suck in the snow and mud imo. mtrs hold up great in snow and mud. but on rock ive seen them fail. my bfgs would kill it when the rocks where wet but my buddies kevlars sucked. idk to each his own. the km2 is a mini krawler design which. is obviously way better on rock

 

agreed they did kick but and so did the bfg km when they made them. i made a weird transition with tires since 07
07 bfg km
08 bfg km
09 bfg km and km2
10 bfg km2 and new mtr for 2 months
11 bfg km2 and irok
i guess not weird transition just consistent minus the irok.

 

looks are for ladies. jk lol but one tire that i wanna try is the maxxis creepy crawler in the 38" flavor.

 

inb4 mall crawler comments, but to me looks are significant too. Probably 30% of my decision to buy something is how it looks, 70% based on performance. I know Baja Claws aren't the best tires, but they look awesome so I still like them, probably wouldn't buy a set though.