What is the correct flange thickness?
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 28
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L coming out, 4.7L Stroker going in soon.
Having the same problem with my new ATP 101212 header. The flange is thicker than the intake manifold tabs. I contacted ATP and will report what they have to say. I can't imagine there aren't many more folks with this issue. Mine is on a 98 Cherokee Sport 4.0L. Thoughts?
Having the same problem with my new ATP 101212 header. The flange is thicker than the intake manifold tabs. I contacted ATP and will report what they have to say. I can't imagine there aren't many more folks with this issue. Mine is on a 98 Cherokee Sport 4.0L. Thoughts?
I didn't get as far as the ATP header ( tried two different suppliers of that design), and just went with the NAPA/Dorman improved-OEM design (with expansion pieces).
I suppose if you know someone with a quality shop belt sander and grind off the excess on the flange, if ATP won't refund you. I had the opposite problem, in that the flange was too thin.
There were two threads (including this one) on the topic this year, and it seems only the US suppliers had the problem of too much material on the flange. I can't find the other one--I must've unsubscribed.
I don't know if we collectively took measurements of the intakes, but I'm assuming they're all within a slim margin of error.
Last edited by jessenator; Dec 22, 2018 at 11:10 PM.
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 28
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L coming out, 4.7L Stroker going in soon.
Well, I ended on giving up on the 3-into-2-into-1 design myself, as mentioned earlier.
I didn't get as far as the ATP header ( tried two different suppliers of that design), and just went with the NAPA/Dorman improved-OEM design (with expansion pieces).
I suppose if you know someone with a quality shop belt sander and grind off the excess on the flange, if ATP won't refund you. I had the opposite problem, in that the flange was too thin.
There were two threads (including this one) on the topic this year, and it seems only the US suppliers had the problem of too much material on the flange. I can't find the other one--I must've unsubscribed.
I don't know if we collectively took measurements of the intakes, but I'm assuming they're all within a slim margin of error.
I didn't get as far as the ATP header ( tried two different suppliers of that design), and just went with the NAPA/Dorman improved-OEM design (with expansion pieces).
I suppose if you know someone with a quality shop belt sander and grind off the excess on the flange, if ATP won't refund you. I had the opposite problem, in that the flange was too thin.
There were two threads (including this one) on the topic this year, and it seems only the US suppliers had the problem of too much material on the flange. I can't find the other one--I must've unsubscribed.
I don't know if we collectively took measurements of the intakes, but I'm assuming they're all within a slim margin of error.
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 28
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0L coming out, 4.7L Stroker going in soon.
OMIX-ADA 16919.32 Manifold Washer
I'll need to shim in 8 spots so I ordered 4 washers to cut in half. In the meantime, i'll cut a couple today and post the results with pics.Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gintaras
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
16
Mar 2, 2010 10:15 AM
thelaststarfighter13
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
1
Jul 20, 2009 10:47 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



