upper ball joint is NOT an interference fit in D30
Thread Starter
CF Veteran




Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 3,816
Likes: 725
Year: 96
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
The title says it in short, the upper ball joint is not a tight interference fit within the D30 housing ends that retain the knuckle, allowing the ball joint to move up & down slightly
The problem seems to D30 hole being oversize, as I swapped the ball joint with another used one which I had to press out of its housing, but it went into my axle housing just by tapping it down
For the time being, I placed 2 washers between the knuckle arm and retaining nut, and this seems to have limited the amount of movement from previously about 3/16" to about 1/32"
This can be observed where the shoulder of the ball joint raised up from the top of the D30 C arm
I checked the archives, and I see knurled ball joints mentioned
Is this the only way forward for me ?
I will monitor the situation, seems ok for the time being, but it can obviously never get better
I just had to change entire axle housings, so this is a bit of an annoyance
It is not at all sloppy, just not an interference press fit, like it should be
I would consider a few tack welds if youse advise me, just little easily ground away little jobbies, might stop it moving up & down, which can only lead to a more wear, they would be ball joint shoulder to D30arm top
The problem seems to D30 hole being oversize, as I swapped the ball joint with another used one which I had to press out of its housing, but it went into my axle housing just by tapping it down
For the time being, I placed 2 washers between the knuckle arm and retaining nut, and this seems to have limited the amount of movement from previously about 3/16" to about 1/32"
This can be observed where the shoulder of the ball joint raised up from the top of the D30 C arm
I checked the archives, and I see knurled ball joints mentioned
Is this the only way forward for me ?
I will monitor the situation, seems ok for the time being, but it can obviously never get better
I just had to change entire axle housings, so this is a bit of an annoyance
It is not at all sloppy, just not an interference press fit, like it should be
I would consider a few tack welds if youse advise me, just little easily ground away little jobbies, might stop it moving up & down, which can only lead to a more wear, they would be ball joint shoulder to D30arm top
Thread Starter
CF Veteran




Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 3,816
Likes: 725
Year: 96
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
So would this item be the best solution?
I do not know if the OD of the splined area is slightly over sized to take up any wear on the axle cup
I do have inside & outside mics to check
Thread Starter
CF Veteran




Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 3,816
Likes: 725
Year: 96
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
ok Gents,
a .005" oversize version of the above part is winging its way to Australia from Rock Auto
I am guessing mine has an ~ .001" interference fit at most, its not at all sloppy, but it can move up & down within the cup under the force of road use, which is is limited to ~1/8", but that cannot be acceptable to me, as not only will it wear the cup bore out over time, but I reckon it would also affect the accuracy of that wheels steering
a .005" oversize version of the above part is winging its way to Australia from Rock Auto
I am guessing mine has an ~ .001" interference fit at most, its not at all sloppy, but it can move up & down within the cup under the force of road use, which is is limited to ~1/8", but that cannot be acceptable to me, as not only will it wear the cup bore out over time, but I reckon it would also affect the accuracy of that wheels steering
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlueRidgeMark
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
18
Jun 25, 2017 09:59 PM
iluvmud
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
27
Sep 21, 2012 10:39 PM
gearheadette
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
3
Apr 21, 2009 09:22 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



