Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here XJ (84-01)
All OEM related XJ specific tech. Examples, no start, general maintenance or anything that's stock.

Gas question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 11:58 AM
  #1  
shadowmoses's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Model: Cherokee
Default Gas question

I put plus gas in my 2000 XJ a few times and then heard it was bad for it, what could it so to my engine? I think I filled it up 2 or 3 times with plus
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 12:41 PM
  #2  
djb383's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,172
Likes: 17
From: The Republic of TEXAS
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

What u heard is bad, misinformed, mythical info. Google "octane myths" and get good valid info. "Plus" gas will in no way be "bad" for your XJ......it's just NOT necessary and wastes your money.

Last edited by djb383; Jan 1, 2015 at 12:49 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 01:13 PM
  #3  
kgm's Avatar
kgm
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 2
From: Denver
Year: 99
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Here in CO, we have 85, 87, and 91 I believe it is. You can run 85 without knocking due to elevation, I guess, but I've been running 87 and get much better mileage. It costs 15-20 cents more but I get 4-5 MPG more.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 03:09 PM
  #4  
twinkiedooter's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 1
From: Northern Ohio
Year: 1997
Model: Grand Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Here in Ohio it's 85,87 and 93. I use the mid range on my 97. My 94 was very fussy and would only get decent gas mileage with the high test.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 03:35 PM
  #5  
Parsnip's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 2
From: Roanoke, VA
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

A common misconception about octane is that it is the flammability or volatility of the fuel, when it's the opposite. The higher number is higher resistance to knocking or pinging due to high combustion chamber temps and pressures. I run 87 in my 90, no additives, and get about 15-16mpg on 5" lift with 3.73 and 35s, regardless of gas grade
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 04:14 PM
  #6  
djb383's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,172
Likes: 17
From: The Republic of TEXAS
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

There's always a post or 2 saying/claiming better mpg with higher octane than what the motor was designed to efficiently run on. There r article after article saying higher octane than necessary WILL NOT improve mpg. Octane myths claiming better mpg using a higher number just keep on keepin' on.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 05:24 PM
  #7  
1991Jeep_Man's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 16
From: Fauquier County, Virginia
Year: 1991
Model: Cherokee
Engine: I-6 4.0 HO
Default

If anything, I have been told that running too high of an octane fuel with colder plugs in low compression engines can result in incomplete burns.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 06:02 PM
  #8  
djb383's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,172
Likes: 17
From: The Republic of TEXAS
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Another myth. And a colder plug has nothing to do with spark power or heat. Plug temp has to do with how hot/cold the porcelain tip is.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 06:40 PM
  #9  
rgr4475's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 897
Likes: 2
From: NJ
Year: 2004 WJ, 1998 XJ
Model: Grand Cherokee(WJ)
Engine: 4.7 HO
Default

Originally Posted by djb383
What u heard is bad, misinformed, mythical info. Google "octane myths" and get good valid info. "Plus" gas will in no way be "bad" for your XJ......it's just NOT necessary and wastes your money.
Yup. This always comes up in a super sport motorcycle forum I belong too. Most people can just not grasp this and insist on "running the good stuff" even though the bike is engineered to run on 87.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 07:02 PM
  #10  
djb383's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,172
Likes: 17
From: The Republic of TEXAS
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Using higher octane than what the book recommends will not improve mpg/make the motor run cleaner/increase performance or in any way damage/harm the motor. Running higher octane than needed is simply a waste of money. All this presumes the motor is well maintained and tuned to factory specs.

Running lower octane than recommended is when problems can start.

Last edited by djb383; Jan 1, 2015 at 07:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 07:44 PM
  #11  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

I've never heard that myth before! One for my records.

The ONLY time running a fuel with a "higher than recommended" Research Octane Number is going to have any effect is

- When the more expensive fuel has better detergent additives (cleaning injectors over time).
- When the more expensive fuel is a different blend (eg 91 here is pure gasoline, 87 is 10% ethanol). This is highly dependent on vehicle, some vehicles run better with ethanol, some better without, others no difference.
- When some internal engine problem is causing pre-ignition knock, such as carbon buildup.

Otherwise, it does nothing.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 11:03 PM
  #12  
djb383's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,172
Likes: 17
From: The Republic of TEXAS
Year: 1998
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L HO
Default

Originally Posted by salad
I've never heard that myth before! One for my records.......
Which myth r u referring too.....there r several myths in this thread already.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 11:06 PM
  #13  
extrashaky's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 18
From: Florida
Year: 2000
Model: Cherokee(XJ)
Engine: Golen 4.6L
Default

Originally Posted by salad
The ONLY time running a fuel with a "higher than recommended" Research Octane Number is going to have any effect is
In the US and Canada, octane is posted in AKI. RON is used in Australia.

If he put 87 RON in his XJ, it would struggle.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 11:09 PM
  #14  
Parsnip's Avatar
CF Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 2
From: Roanoke, VA
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
Default

Originally Posted by extrashaky

In the US and Canada, octane is posted in AKI. RON is used in Australia.

If he put 87 RON in his XJ, it would struggle.
Actually most us gas stations use Ron+Mon/2
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 11:14 PM
  #15  
salad's Avatar
Herp Derp Jerp
Premium Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 18,251
Likes: 17
From: Parham, ON
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L OBD-II
Default

Originally Posted by djb383
Which myth r u referring too.....there r several myths in this thread already.
Good point LOL The first one from the OP.

Originally Posted by extrashaky
In the US and Canada, octane is posted in AKI. RON is used in Australia.

If he put 87 RON in his XJ, it would struggle.
Interesting. Gonna have to poke in the eye whoever told me that one. Internet tells me that Anti Knock Index is (RON + MON) / 2. That explains why Australian lads report much higher "octane" numbers.

Why can't people standardize on this ****???
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.