94 HO with power/comfort switch
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northen Europe
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
94 HO with power/comfort switch for trans
After reading here about the switch and how it was taken away after -91 I have a question about the relation engine vs. trans.
My 94 HO has the switch (and it works), have always kept it on comfort but now I'm starting to think that it might hurt the transmission using comfort with the HO engine. Also looking for a bit better MPG (getting 17-20 MPG city/hiway) but it's mostly the trans I'm concered about.
Anyone else with the switch or any comments?
My 94 HO has the switch (and it works), have always kept it on comfort but now I'm starting to think that it might hurt the transmission using comfort with the HO engine. Also looking for a bit better MPG (getting 17-20 MPG city/hiway) but it's mostly the trans I'm concered about.
Anyone else with the switch or any comments?
Last edited by McHank; 11-27-2011 at 07:35 AM.
#2
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,867
Received 1,525 Likes
on
1,237 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Leave it in Power mode. Neither selection wil hurt your AW4, and the HO only has 8 more horsepower than the most powerful Renix, and that's all at higher RPM.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northen Europe
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northen Europe
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
Ok, my reasoning for asking was that I read something about the trans slipping in comfort mode and therefor could ruin the trans a bitter quicker, but I'm still a rookie when it comes to jeeps.
#6
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,867
Received 1,525 Likes
on
1,237 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Westminster Colorado
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1991 (2-door)
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
I had the switch on my '91 and always kept it on power cause there was a diference in what RPM the trans shifted. The AW-4 is a beast though and I wouldnt worry about the switch hurting it.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
I call it the "power/economy" switch!
I get at least 2 more mpg on my 90 RENIX with the switch in comfort. With the switch in comfort the TC locks up at a lower mph in 3rd and will drop into and hold OD at a lower speed as well. I would guess in theory this could cause more wear but I doubt the AW4 really cares until it gets to the 300k milestone.
I ran into a XJ'er the other day that was well over 400k on his 89, 4.0, AW4, NP231, D-35 XJ. All original, just routine maintenance. It was rough on the outside but was running really well.
I get at least 2 more mpg on my 90 RENIX with the switch in comfort. With the switch in comfort the TC locks up at a lower mph in 3rd and will drop into and hold OD at a lower speed as well. I would guess in theory this could cause more wear but I doubt the AW4 really cares until it gets to the 300k milestone.
I ran into a XJ'er the other day that was well over 400k on his 89, 4.0, AW4, NP231, D-35 XJ. All original, just routine maintenance. It was rough on the outside but was running really well.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
91 was the last year of the P/C switch. All models after that were wired from the factory in the power mode.
This was noted in post 1
This was noted in post 1
After reading here about the switch and how it was taken away after -91 I have a question about the relation engine vs. trans.
My 94 HO has the switch (and it works), have always kept it on comfort but now I'm starting to think that it might hurt the transmission using comfort with the HO engine. Also looking for a bit better MPG (getting 17-20 MPG city/hiway) but it's mostly the trans I'm concered about.
Anyone else with the switch or any comments?
My 94 HO has the switch (and it works), have always kept it on comfort but now I'm starting to think that it might hurt the transmission using comfort with the HO engine. Also looking for a bit better MPG (getting 17-20 MPG city/hiway) but it's mostly the trans I'm concered about.
Anyone else with the switch or any comments?
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northen Europe
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
I call it the "power/economy" switch!
I get at least 2 more mpg on my 90 RENIX with the switch in comfort. With the switch in comfort the TC locks up at a lower mph in 3rd and will drop into and hold OD at a lower speed as well. I would guess in theory this could cause more wear but I doubt the AW4 really cares until it gets to the 300k milestone.
I ran into a XJ'er the other day that was well over 400k on his 89, 4.0, AW4, NP231, D-35 XJ. All original, just routine maintenance. It was rough on the outside but was running really well.
I get at least 2 more mpg on my 90 RENIX with the switch in comfort. With the switch in comfort the TC locks up at a lower mph in 3rd and will drop into and hold OD at a lower speed as well. I would guess in theory this could cause more wear but I doubt the AW4 really cares until it gets to the 300k milestone.
I ran into a XJ'er the other day that was well over 400k on his 89, 4.0, AW4, NP231, D-35 XJ. All original, just routine maintenance. It was rough on the outside but was running really well.
That's really tempting, any ideas on what to put on the switch?