What year engines will swap?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
What year engines will swap?
Found a good 98 Grand Cherokee 4.0 long block for sale with only 40k miles on it. Wondering if it would fit into my 92 cherokee? What years of cherokee/grand cherokee engines will swap? what are the differences if any? I know my 92 is OBDI while the 98 was OBDII
thanks!
thanks!
#2
CF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,128
Received 287 Likes
on
237 Posts
Year: 1987 MJ, 1998 XJ, 1973 J2000, 89 waggy
Model: Comanche (MJ)
Engine: 4.0L H.O
pretty sure the head uses a different style exhaust/intake manifold(s). also the block has some small casting differences... most of your bracketry for the accessories are also different. The sensors all have a different harness style connector so those would need to be swapped as well.
#3
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,867
Received 1,525 Likes
on
1,237 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
I think with a 98 you might be just fine.
Not 100% sure.
You're gonna use your sensors so the electrical portion should not be a problem.
Go to www.rockauto.com and compare part numbers for an intake/exhaust gasket between a 92 an 98. That'll answer the question on manifold compatability.
Not 100% sure.
You're gonna use your sensors so the electrical portion should not be a problem.
Go to www.rockauto.com and compare part numbers for an intake/exhaust gasket between a 92 an 98. That'll answer the question on manifold compatability.
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
I think with a 98 you might be just fine.
Not 100% sure.
You're gonna use your sensors so the electrical portion should not be a problem.
Go to www.rockauto.com and compare part numbers for an intake/exhaust gasket between a 92 an 98. That'll answer the question on manifold compatability.
Not 100% sure.
You're gonna use your sensors so the electrical portion should not be a problem.
Go to www.rockauto.com and compare part numbers for an intake/exhaust gasket between a 92 an 98. That'll answer the question on manifold compatability.
Last edited by amorgan93; 01-23-2012 at 12:05 AM.
#5
Seasoned Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Year: 1999
Model: Cherokee
Engine: chrysler 4.0
The HO 4.0 block itself is universal as far as i know. I swapped a 4.0 from a 98 larado into a 99 sport no problem. Just hold on to everything else to swap over. Intake, fuel rail and injectors, wiring harness most importantly. I ripped the engine out of the larado and stripped it down to a long block and then just swapped everything over. Taking everything you can off the motor while it's still in the jeep makes pulling it that much easier anyway. Shortest time I've swapped an engine in a cherokee was a weekend and thats only cause i did it on a military base at their auto hobby shop which kicked you out at a certain time or else I'd've had that sucker swapped in a day no problem. Friendly pointer as well whici i wish i would've done while i was doing the swap too. The 90 degree elbow for the oil filter, pull it off and replace that seal cause then tend to leak over time and wen the motor is pulled it's the easiest time to do that. Otherwise if you don't and it leaks the easiest fix with the motor in is to pull the elbow (which sucks) and put a smaller oil filter on.
Last edited by cherokee94&99; 01-23-2012 at 01:38 AM.
#6
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,867
Received 1,525 Likes
on
1,237 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
It's Renix. And it will swap if you use your manifolds, flywheel, dizzy, all your sensors obviously, and maybe valve cover.
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
sleep deprivation haha so i can use the renix head? Because im 99% sure the head on my HO 4.0 has cracks in it, i wouldnt be comfortable using it. will the ECU adjust for the differences in compression because doesnt the renix have a lower compression? it has 20 less hp stock.
Trending Topics
#8
CF Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Year: 1987
Model: Wagoneer
Engine: Renix 4.0
sleep deprivation haha so i can use the renix head? Because im 99% sure the head on my HO 4.0 has cracks in it, i wouldnt be comfortable using it. will the ECU adjust for the differences in compression because doesnt the renix have a lower compression? it has 20 less hp stock.
#9
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,867
Received 1,525 Likes
on
1,237 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
Renix head works fine. The ECU could give 2 craps what head is on an HO or vice versa. The HO is not magic by any means. Pretty much a marketing ploy by Chrysler anyway. Go for it.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Model: Cherokee
The principal changes made to make the 242ci engine an "HO" variant are these:
1) Intake ports raised 5/8", reducing the angle that air has to go through to enter the chamber. This makes the head breathe more efficiently.
2) Engine management is OBD-compliant, which makes it a bit easier to tune (RENIX is "pre-OBD.") However, as mentioned, nearly any diagnosis on RENIX can be done with a DMM - there are only a couple of tests that require an analogue. And, I've known OBD to be wrong. I prefer to do my own thinking.
3) The intake manifolds were gradually improved 1991-2007, eliminating right-angle bends and sharp corners (both of which improve airflow.)
4) The knock sensor (found on RENIX) was deleted for 1991.
5) The EGR valve (never really needed on these engines anyhow) was deleted for 1991.
seems like the swap would be a little more difficult than i thought. not sure though
#11
CF Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Williamsport, Pa
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Year: 1997
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0L
Why are you going from looking at a '98 block to an '88? The '98 block will be the best choice. Only thing you'll have to change are the sensors on the intake and TB. Everything else will work fine, if not better.
Run away from the '88 block, not worth it IMO. Especailly since there are plenty of '92+ motors out there waiting to be transplanted.
Run away from the '88 block, not worth it IMO. Especailly since there are plenty of '92+ motors out there waiting to be transplanted.
#12
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,867
Received 1,525 Likes
on
1,237 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
well i accidentally found some information about the differences in the engines. haha
The principal changes made to make the 242ci engine an "HO" variant are these:
1) Intake ports raised 5/8", reducing the angle that air has to go through to enter the chamber. This makes the head breathe more efficiently.
2) Engine management is OBD-compliant, which makes it a bit easier to tune (RENIX is "pre-OBD.") However, as mentioned, nearly any diagnosis on RENIX can be done with a DMM - there are only a couple of tests that require an analogue. And, I've known OBD to be wrong. I prefer to do my own thinking.
3) The intake manifolds were gradually improved 1991-2007, eliminating right-angle bends and sharp corners (both of which improve airflow.)
4) The knock sensor (found on RENIX) was deleted for 1991.
5) The EGR valve (never really needed on these engines anyhow) was deleted for 1991.
seems like the swap would be a little more difficult than i thought. not sure though
The principal changes made to make the 242ci engine an "HO" variant are these:
1) Intake ports raised 5/8", reducing the angle that air has to go through to enter the chamber. This makes the head breathe more efficiently.
2) Engine management is OBD-compliant, which makes it a bit easier to tune (RENIX is "pre-OBD.") However, as mentioned, nearly any diagnosis on RENIX can be done with a DMM - there are only a couple of tests that require an analogue. And, I've known OBD to be wrong. I prefer to do my own thinking.
3) The intake manifolds were gradually improved 1991-2007, eliminating right-angle bends and sharp corners (both of which improve airflow.)
4) The knock sensor (found on RENIX) was deleted for 1991.
5) The EGR valve (never really needed on these engines anyhow) was deleted for 1991.
seems like the swap would be a little more difficult than i thought. not sure though
#13
Why are you going from looking at a '98 block to an '88? The '98 block will be the best choice. Only thing you'll have to change are the sensors on the intake and TB. Everything else will work fine, if not better.
Run away from the '88 block, not worth it IMO. Especailly since there are plenty of '92+ motors out there waiting to be transplanted.
Run away from the '88 block, not worth it IMO. Especailly since there are plenty of '92+ motors out there waiting to be transplanted.
#14
::CF Moderator::
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Prescott, Az
Posts: 43,867
Received 1,525 Likes
on
1,237 Posts
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee (XJ)
Engine: 4.0
The following users liked this post:
ijeeep (04-03-2024)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
clangstaff
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
3
05-30-2019 10:34 AM
clark40
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
1
08-28-2015 07:11 AM
smithj
Stock XJ Cherokee Tech. All XJ Non-modified/stock questions go here
0
08-23-2015 12:14 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)