explorer rear end... why not a ranger?
CF Veteran
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
From: Utardiland
Year: whats left of a 91
Model: Cherokee
Engine: one that makes noise
You must not know your facts, because I entered my numbers from Jim Allen's Axles 101 and those numbers were sourced from the Axle Manufactures Association. So I guess you are mistaken, although I stated that the 8.8 was closer to a D/60 in strength than it was to a D/35 I never stated that it was equal or almost equal in strength to a D/60.
so you copy and pasted the torque load good for you, that doesn't mean that you know it. frankly the torque load numbers change so much when you modify an axle and add things such as bigger tires that i'd rather o by actual dimensions of the shaft diameter, R&P size, tube diameter and thickness, housing thickness etc. than a few numbers that were pulled off of a stock setup.
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,328
Likes: 1
From: SLC, UT
Year: 1989 2 door
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
I see why dudes go with the 8.8 on a moderate build, but if its just gonna end up a toy I can also see jmaxj's side as there's no point in tossing in a axle your just gonna rip out for a D60 a year down the road!! Guess you just gotta ask yourself "what am I gonna want outta this rig in a couple years?"
I know cause that's what I'm thinking now!
I know cause that's what I'm thinking now!
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 3
From: Cove, OR
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
i never stated torque numbers nor did i ever state that i knew them. i simply gave dimensions and actual specs. the only real difference is that the R&P is a little bigger so why would i go through all the trouble for a little bit bigger R&P. oh and my specs were pulled straight from the manufacturers axle build sheets BTW so your arguing that i don't know my facts when you've only pulled torque numbers not specs.
so you copy and pasted the torque load good for you, that doesn't mean that you know it. frankly the torque load numbers change so much when you modify an axle and add things such as bigger tires that i'd rather o by actual dimensions of the shaft diameter, R&P size, tube diameter and thickness, housing thickness etc. than a few numbers that were pulled off of a stock setup.
CF Veteran
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
From: Utardiland
Year: whats left of a 91
Model: Cherokee
Engine: one that makes noise
You stated that the D/35 is almost as strong as a Ford 8.8 that is what started this discussion, not me.
Yes I used information I have in some reference material. I do know something about axles I've been wheeling for over 35 years, but I don't have every axles torque ratings memorized.
Yes I used information I have in some reference material. I do know something about axles I've been wheeling for over 35 years, but I don't have every axles torque ratings memorized.
now with that being said. i'm gonna say this, for mild wheelin on 31-33" tires its a decent axle. but i wouldn't toss a set of 35's on it and push it since i've seen quite a few explode doing moderate ledge climbs.
Thread Starter
CF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,858
Likes: 1
From: Nor-Cal
Year: 1990
Model: Cherokee
Engine: The venerable 4.0
Originally Posted by Rock Toy
I guess the main thing is did you get the answer to your question? Not to sure about what turds you are stirring, hope that wasn't meant as an insult.
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: EAFB, SD
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
So lets disspell some of the bull**** in this thread about the Ford 8.8 vs the Dana 35.

(^photo since no one loaded the tablemaker code on here^)
Ford 8.8" shaft vs Dana 35 shaft

(^photo since no one loaded the tablemaker code on here^)
Ford 8.8" shaft vs Dana 35 shaft
Last edited by cdawall; Sep 29, 2011 at 06:51 PM.
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: EAFB, SD
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
CF Veteran
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: EAFB, SD
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 3
From: Cove, OR
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
no problem what i don't understand is how the D35 is compared to a Ford 8.8" the 8.8" is used in FULLSIZE TRUCKS. The D35 is used in vehicles with half the towing capacity, half the payload etc. It is considered a 1/4 truck rearend. Hell the IFS is the same axle with a higher GAWR 

CF Veteran
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
From: EAFB, SD
Year: 1994
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0 HO
I have been running my 28 spline for a couple of years with a set of 33's and now heavy bias 33s neither has caused an issue and I use the brakes and LSD like a locker.
CF Veteran
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 3
From: Cove, OR
Year: 1993
Model: Cherokee
Engine: 4.0
The two 28 spline 8.8s I saw break were both from dropping back off of a rock ledge with the skinny peddle on the floor, so something had to give.
it's all about how much money you put into your axle of choice. i think the 8.8 is a fair upgrade to run 33's if you do it cheap and if you want to run 35's, add aftermarket shafts. that being said if i had a d35 i would rather spend $100 on a bolt in 29 spline c8.25 than spend $300+ to make an 8.8 work. there are things about the 8.8 that i just don't like. if you're spending $1200 on an 8.8 you're doing it wrong lol
i got an xj d44 from the jy for $90 and i have been super mean to it for the last 2.5 yrs (9 moab trips) with no issues so i couldn't be happier
i got an xj d44 from the jy for $90 and i have been super mean to it for the last 2.5 yrs (9 moab trips) with no issues so i couldn't be happier


